Home Mathematics 5. Optimality criteria for probabilistic numerical methods
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

5. Optimality criteria for probabilistic numerical methods

  • C. J. Oates , J. Cockayne , D. Prangle , T. J. Sullivan and M. Girolami
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

It is well understood that Bayesian decision theory and average case analysis are essentially identical. However, if one is interested in performing uncertainty quantification for a numerical task, it can be argued that standard approaches from the decision-theoretic framework are neither appropriate nor sufficient. Instead, we consider a particular optimality criterion from Bayesian experimental design and study its implied optimal information in the numerical context. This information is demonstrated to differ, in general, from the information that would be used in an averagecase- optimal numerical method. The explicit connection to Bayesian experimental design suggests several distinct regimes, in which optimal probabilistic numerical methods can be developed.

Abstract

It is well understood that Bayesian decision theory and average case analysis are essentially identical. However, if one is interested in performing uncertainty quantification for a numerical task, it can be argued that standard approaches from the decision-theoretic framework are neither appropriate nor sufficient. Instead, we consider a particular optimality criterion from Bayesian experimental design and study its implied optimal information in the numerical context. This information is demonstrated to differ, in general, from the information that would be used in an averagecase- optimal numerical method. The explicit connection to Bayesian experimental design suggests several distinct regimes, in which optimal probabilistic numerical methods can be developed.

Downloaded on 28.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110635461-005/html
Scroll to top button