Home Classical, Ancient Near Eastern & Egyptian Studies How Long Did the Lost Plays of Greek Tragedy Survive?
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

How Long Did the Lost Plays of Greek Tragedy Survive?

  • Matthew Wright
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Fragmentation in Ancient Greek Drama
This chapter is in the book Fragmentation in Ancient Greek Drama
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Munich/Boston

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Munich/Boston

Chapters in this book

  1. Frontmatter I
  2. Foreword V
  3. Contents VII
  4. List of Figures XI
  5. List of Tables XIII
  6. Introduction
  7. οὐ σῴζεται or σῴζονται: Preliminary Remarks on the Study of Dramatic Fragments Today 3
  8. Part I: Quotation, Transmission, and Reconstruction of Fragments
  9. On the Hermeneutics of the Fragment 21
  10. Old Comic Citation of Tragedy As Such 39
  11. On Literary Fragmentation and Quotation in Aristophanes: Some Theoretical Considerations 49
  12. On Types of Fragments 61
  13. How Long Did the Lost Plays of Greek Tragedy Survive? 83
  14. What we Do (Not) Know about Lost Comedies: Fragments and Testimonia 105
  15. The Fragments of Aristophanes’ Gerytades: Methodological Considerations 129
  16. Fragments of Aeschylus and the Number of Actors 145
  17. Part II: Fragmented Tragedy
  18. Revisiting the Danaid Trilogy 155
  19. Tragicorum Graecorum Fragmenta Volume II: Old Texts, New Opportunities 165
  20. παῖς μάργος 183
  21. Aeschylus’ Actaeon: A Playboy on the Greek Tragic Stage? 201
  22. Euripides or Critias, or Neither? Reflections on an Unresolved Question 235
  23. Fragmented Intergeneric Discourses: Epinician Echoes in Euripides’ Alexandros 257
  24. Wink or Twitch? Euripides’ Autolycus (fr. 282) and the Ideologies of Fragmentation 275
  25. Barbarism and Fragmentation in Fifth- Century Tragedy: Barbarians in the Fragments and “Fragmented” Barbarians 299
  26. Part III: Fragmented Comedy
  27. Epicharmus, Odysseus Automolos: Some Marginal Remarks on frr. 97 and 98 K–A 321
  28. δηλαδὴ τρίπους: On Epicharmus fr. 147 K–A 337
  29. Crates and the Polis: Reframing the Case 353
  30. On Some Short (and Dubious) Fragments of Aristophanes 369
  31. Heracles’ Adventures at the Inn, or How Fragments and Plays Converse 379
  32. Ethnic Stereotypes and Ethnic Mockery in Ancient Greek Comedy 407
  33. Part IV: The Reception of Tragic Fragments
  34. Aeschylean Fragments in the Herculaneum Papyri: More Questions than Answers. Prometheus Unbound in Philodemus’ On Piety 437
  35. Paratragic Fragmentation and Patchwork- Citation as Comic Aesthetics: The Potpourri Use of Euripides’ Helen and Andromeda in Aristophanes’ Thesmophoriazusae and Their Symbolic Meaning 453
  36. Fragmentary Comedy and the Evidence of Vase-Painting: Euripidean Parody in Aristophanes’ Anagyros 481
  37. Α Cause for Fragmentation: Tragic Fragments in Plato’s Republic 501
  38. Dio Chrysostom and the Citation of Tragedy 527
  39. From the Great Banquets of Aeschylus: Gorgias, Aristophanes and Xenakis’ Oresteia 545
  40. Part V: The Reception of Comic Fragments
  41. How Cratinus fr. 372 Made Theatre History 573
  42. Increasing Comic Fragmentation: Some Aspects of Text Re-uses in Athenaeus 603
  43. πλῆθος ὅσον ἰχθύων ... ἐπὶ πινάκων ἀργυρῶν (Ath. 6.224b): A Different Kettle of Fish 617
  44. Fragments of Menander in Stobaeus 647
  45. The Long Shadow of Fame: Quotations from Epicharmus in Works of the Imperial Period 663
  46. List of Contributors 691
  47. Index of Sources 697
  48. General Index 717
Downloaded on 24.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110621693-006/html?lang=en&srsltid=AfmBOop9mV0HvVun_4o4QvIV4o95cqZf4q8p6s1llrPHT5hAdXo9vRW7
Scroll to top button