Home Physical Sciences 4. The IUPAC systematic nomenclature
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

4. The IUPAC systematic nomenclature

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
The Etymology of Chemical Names
This chapter is in the book The Etymology of Chemical Names
4 The IUPAC systematic nomenclatureWith its recommendations the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry(IUPAC) [1], founded in 1919, standardizes chemical nomenclature in general [2]and has, inter alia, issued recommendations for the nomenclature of inorganicchemistry in the shape of theRed Book[3] and of organic chemistry as theBlueBook[4]. The 2013 issue of theBlue Bookis beset by a sheer overwhelming num-ber of misprints and errors and IUPAC has initiated a project to provide a list of er-rata to the IUPACBlue Book, an improved subject index, some corrected,improved, or revised sections, and some additional sections to deal with omissionsfrom the current edition [5]. A dedicated IUPAC Nomenclature webpage provides awealth of information including many structural formulas with the appropriate lo-cants shown [6].By and large IUPAC nomenclature operates with three naming systems, i.e.compositional, substitutive, and additive names. Even in simple cases, such as PF3,this gives rise to three valid IUPAC names, i.e. phosphorus trifluoride, trifluoro-phosphane, and trifluoridophosphorus.4.1 Retained namesContrary to popular belief even basically systematic nomenclature cannot avoidthe use of trivial names in the shape ofretained names. Trivial names have beenretained for mainly two reasons: names which are deeply rooted in common lan-guage and names whose fully systematic equivalent would be unwieldy andtedious.4.1.1 Parent hydridesThe current IUPAC nomenclature is the result of a tug-of-war between tradition, sys-tematic rigor, and convenience. Already IUPACs naming of the alkanes breaks withthe otherwise fundamental rule that parent hydride names of non-metallic elementsshould be composed of the modified element name andanewhich, in the case ofcarbon, gives the names carbane, dicarbane, tricarbane, etc., is broken in deferenceto tradition: the first four alkanes, methane, ethane, propane, and butane, retaintheir well-established trivial names, and the following pentane, hexane, etc. lackthe otherwise mandatory element name, also here following a strong and ingrowntradition. Thus, a very basic IUPAC rule has never been extended to apply to themany millions of organic compounds.https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110612714-004
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Munich/Boston

4 The IUPAC systematic nomenclatureWith its recommendations the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry(IUPAC) [1], founded in 1919, standardizes chemical nomenclature in general [2]and has, inter alia, issued recommendations for the nomenclature of inorganicchemistry in the shape of theRed Book[3] and of organic chemistry as theBlueBook[4]. The 2013 issue of theBlue Bookis beset by a sheer overwhelming num-ber of misprints and errors and IUPAC has initiated a project to provide a list of er-rata to the IUPACBlue Book, an improved subject index, some corrected,improved, or revised sections, and some additional sections to deal with omissionsfrom the current edition [5]. A dedicated IUPAC Nomenclature webpage provides awealth of information including many structural formulas with the appropriate lo-cants shown [6].By and large IUPAC nomenclature operates with three naming systems, i.e.compositional, substitutive, and additive names. Even in simple cases, such as PF3,this gives rise to three valid IUPAC names, i.e. phosphorus trifluoride, trifluoro-phosphane, and trifluoridophosphorus.4.1 Retained namesContrary to popular belief even basically systematic nomenclature cannot avoidthe use of trivial names in the shape ofretained names. Trivial names have beenretained for mainly two reasons: names which are deeply rooted in common lan-guage and names whose fully systematic equivalent would be unwieldy andtedious.4.1.1 Parent hydridesThe current IUPAC nomenclature is the result of a tug-of-war between tradition, sys-tematic rigor, and convenience. Already IUPACs naming of the alkanes breaks withthe otherwise fundamental rule that parent hydride names of non-metallic elementsshould be composed of the modified element name andanewhich, in the case ofcarbon, gives the names carbane, dicarbane, tricarbane, etc., is broken in deferenceto tradition: the first four alkanes, methane, ethane, propane, and butane, retaintheir well-established trivial names, and the following pentane, hexane, etc. lackthe otherwise mandatory element name, also here following a strong and ingrowntradition. Thus, a very basic IUPAC rule has never been extended to apply to themany millions of organic compounds.https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110612714-004
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Munich/Boston
Downloaded on 23.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110612714-004/html?lang=en&srsltid=AfmBOoqh9bCnCeGsLKqfLHnwtlmP-HgalJls0KkgicVEAKMjrAC7UDK8
Scroll to top button