Home Classical, Ancient Near Eastern & Egyptian Studies Wonder-ful Memories in Herodotus’ Histories
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Wonder-ful Memories in Herodotus’ Histories

  • Maria Gerolemou
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

With an awareness that the experience of the wondrous as an emotional event is often privileged in the construction and retrieval of memories, Herodotus utilizes wonder as a mnemonic aid. The wondrous as an easily recollected emotional memory is therefore taken as a mechanism that raises questions on past events, particularly on how an event was experienced and, consequently, what is remembered and in what manner. Moreover, unlike the Homeric thauma idesthai, the Herodotean wonder is not defined by a mere static portrayal of an extraordinary event or object; rather, it directs further action primarily related to the ability of the author to collect and criticize facts, reforming and forming in this way contemporary, past and future experiences. That is, while the wondrous validates itself as a successful memory mechanism (from the past and present and for the future), it also allows Herodotus to access and intervene in (or manipulate) certain memories. Hence, sidestepping the discussion about oral memory vs. the cultivation of memory through written records, this paper follows Herodotus’ deconstruction of past emotional memories as a reliable source of information; although memories are generally important to him, they are not treated as an indispensable and integral part of the historical discourse.

Abstract

With an awareness that the experience of the wondrous as an emotional event is often privileged in the construction and retrieval of memories, Herodotus utilizes wonder as a mnemonic aid. The wondrous as an easily recollected emotional memory is therefore taken as a mechanism that raises questions on past events, particularly on how an event was experienced and, consequently, what is remembered and in what manner. Moreover, unlike the Homeric thauma idesthai, the Herodotean wonder is not defined by a mere static portrayal of an extraordinary event or object; rather, it directs further action primarily related to the ability of the author to collect and criticize facts, reforming and forming in this way contemporary, past and future experiences. That is, while the wondrous validates itself as a successful memory mechanism (from the past and present and for the future), it also allows Herodotus to access and intervene in (or manipulate) certain memories. Hence, sidestepping the discussion about oral memory vs. the cultivation of memory through written records, this paper follows Herodotus’ deconstruction of past emotional memories as a reliable source of information; although memories are generally important to him, they are not treated as an indispensable and integral part of the historical discourse.

Downloaded on 24.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110563559-009/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button