Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

17. The uncertainty of syntactic theorizing

  • und
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
Current Approaches to Syntax
Ein Kapitel aus dem Buch Current Approaches to Syntax

Abstract

In this paper, we present a metatheoretical model and show how it serves to capture some basic properties of generative linguistic theorizing. By ‘generative linguistic theorizing’, we mean actual research practice, i. e. research activities performed while elaborating, putting forward, applying, and testing particular versions of generative linguistics. We call our metatheoretical approach the p-model of plausible argumentation. With the help of the p-model, we will show that the way in which generative linguistics has proceeded over the past decades and is functioning today differs significantly from the self-image of generative linguists as documented in the literature. Thus, we will show that generative linguistic research is built on uncertainty rather than certainty; it tolerates inconsistency instead of defending consistency at all costs; the structure of its theories is not static, but dynamic; and its development is not linear, but cyclic and prismatic.

Abstract

In this paper, we present a metatheoretical model and show how it serves to capture some basic properties of generative linguistic theorizing. By ‘generative linguistic theorizing’, we mean actual research practice, i. e. research activities performed while elaborating, putting forward, applying, and testing particular versions of generative linguistics. We call our metatheoretical approach the p-model of plausible argumentation. With the help of the p-model, we will show that the way in which generative linguistics has proceeded over the past decades and is functioning today differs significantly from the self-image of generative linguists as documented in the literature. Thus, we will show that generative linguistic research is built on uncertainty rather than certainty; it tolerates inconsistency instead of defending consistency at all costs; the structure of its theories is not static, but dynamic; and its development is not linear, but cyclic and prismatic.

Heruntergeladen am 7.5.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110540253-017/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen