Home Linguistics & Semiotics 8. Relative clause constructions in two Yemne-Kimbi languages
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

8. Relative clause constructions in two Yemne-Kimbi languages

  • Jesse Lovegren and Rebecca Voll
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Relative clause constructions are profiled for two Yemne-Kimbi (Bantoid) languages of Lower Fungom (North West Region), Mungbam and Mundabli. Both languages have complex phonological systems, with large vowel inventories, four tone levels, and non-affixal morphological processes. Noun class concord systems are relatively well-preserved in these languages (though moreso in Mungbam than in Mundabli) compared to Grassfields languages further to the South. Properties surveyed include ordering of constituents within the noun phrase, the accessibility of different arguments to relativization, possible historical sources of the relativizer, and differential realization of Tense, Aspect, Mood, Polarity and Focus categories in relative clauses. Parallel coverage of topics offers insight into fine grammatical differences between these two related languages. Data are drawn from texts and elicitations collected in the field between 2008-2012 by the authors.

Abstract

Relative clause constructions are profiled for two Yemne-Kimbi (Bantoid) languages of Lower Fungom (North West Region), Mungbam and Mundabli. Both languages have complex phonological systems, with large vowel inventories, four tone levels, and non-affixal morphological processes. Noun class concord systems are relatively well-preserved in these languages (though moreso in Mungbam than in Mundabli) compared to Grassfields languages further to the South. Properties surveyed include ordering of constituents within the noun phrase, the accessibility of different arguments to relativization, possible historical sources of the relativizer, and differential realization of Tense, Aspect, Mood, Polarity and Focus categories in relative clauses. Parallel coverage of topics offers insight into fine grammatical differences between these two related languages. Data are drawn from texts and elicitations collected in the field between 2008-2012 by the authors.

Downloaded on 1.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110469547-008/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button