Home Linguistics & Semiotics 12. Negation and polarity
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

12. Negation and polarity

  • Pierre Larrivée
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the behaviour of negation in Romance. The adopted perspective is that variation between languages is explained by diachronic tendencies. The principle diachronic motif in the evolution of clausal negation marking is the Jespersen Cycle. This evolution cycle goes from clausal negation being initially marked by an item in preverbal position, that is doubled by a post-verbal item, which with the loss of its preverbal counterpart remains the sole exponent of negation. The pattern is used to compare and contrast clausal negation in the main Romance languages, and the probable causes for similarities and divergences are evoked. The comparison is extended to n-words equivalent to no one and nothing, that are contrasted to Negative Polarity Items such as anyone and a single thing. The presentation clarifies the criteria for the differential status of items and constructions. The recurrence of these statuses can be understood as stages of diachronic processes to illuminate typological convergence.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the behaviour of negation in Romance. The adopted perspective is that variation between languages is explained by diachronic tendencies. The principle diachronic motif in the evolution of clausal negation marking is the Jespersen Cycle. This evolution cycle goes from clausal negation being initially marked by an item in preverbal position, that is doubled by a post-verbal item, which with the loss of its preverbal counterpart remains the sole exponent of negation. The pattern is used to compare and contrast clausal negation in the main Romance languages, and the probable causes for similarities and divergences are evoked. The comparison is extended to n-words equivalent to no one and nothing, that are contrasted to Negative Polarity Items such as anyone and a single thing. The presentation clarifies the criteria for the differential status of items and constructions. The recurrence of these statuses can be understood as stages of diachronic processes to illuminate typological convergence.

Downloaded on 20.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110377088-012/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button