Home History Chapter 4 Beyond this Limit: Women, Modernism and the Modern World
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Chapter 4 Beyond this Limit: Women, Modernism and the Modern World

View more publications by Edinburgh University Press
Chapter 4Beyond this Limit: Women, Modernism and the Modern WorldBut for a woman or any being whose nature it is to live through the emotions, clarity of mind can only be got by taking the natural order. And I do think many of us thinking and educated women of this age go against our natures by striving to force ourselves to deal fi rst through the intellect, living too much with ideas and not suffi ciently trusting ourselves to the truths that would come to us through the deeper sensual and emotional channels.Catherine Carswell (1928)In the Introduction to Gender in Scottish History Since 1700, Lynn Abrams discusses the difference between ‘women’s history and a history informed by understandings of gender’, commenting that while ‘women’s historians aimed fi rst to achieve visibility for women in the past’, their aim today (at least in relation to the developed world) ‘is to identify women as historical subjects or as social actors and to integrate their stories into the historical landscape’.1 Similarly, Marianne Dekoven in ‘Modernism and Gender’, her contribution to The Cambridge Companion to Modernism, argues that the early phase of feminist modernist criticism was preoccupied primarily with establishing the importance of women modernist writers, both by opening the canon to include them and by broadening our under-standing of what constitutes Modernism so that it is not so exclusively defi ned by the valorization of formal as well as thematic characteristics (vast unifying mythic themes) associated with masculinity.2Her view is that once a tradition of ‘women’s modernist writing, and the importance of the major female Modernists became better established’, then the focus changed from viewing the work of female and male modernists separately, and moved towards seeing modernism itself as a wider and more varied movement.3Such a departure from the kind of ‘separate development’ situation of early feminist studies noted by both these writers is certainly the kind of procedure one would want to follow in relation to contemporary literary history where women have to a signifi cant extent achieved an equal presence with men on the cultural stage. Yet this situation is a relatively recent phenomenon in EB0024 - MCCULLOCH TEXT.indd 68EB0024 - MCCULLOCH TEXT.indd 686/4/09 16:13:096/4/09 16:13:09
© 2022, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh

Chapter 4Beyond this Limit: Women, Modernism and the Modern WorldBut for a woman or any being whose nature it is to live through the emotions, clarity of mind can only be got by taking the natural order. And I do think many of us thinking and educated women of this age go against our natures by striving to force ourselves to deal fi rst through the intellect, living too much with ideas and not suffi ciently trusting ourselves to the truths that would come to us through the deeper sensual and emotional channels.Catherine Carswell (1928)In the Introduction to Gender in Scottish History Since 1700, Lynn Abrams discusses the difference between ‘women’s history and a history informed by understandings of gender’, commenting that while ‘women’s historians aimed fi rst to achieve visibility for women in the past’, their aim today (at least in relation to the developed world) ‘is to identify women as historical subjects or as social actors and to integrate their stories into the historical landscape’.1 Similarly, Marianne Dekoven in ‘Modernism and Gender’, her contribution to The Cambridge Companion to Modernism, argues that the early phase of feminist modernist criticism was preoccupied primarily with establishing the importance of women modernist writers, both by opening the canon to include them and by broadening our under-standing of what constitutes Modernism so that it is not so exclusively defi ned by the valorization of formal as well as thematic characteristics (vast unifying mythic themes) associated with masculinity.2Her view is that once a tradition of ‘women’s modernist writing, and the importance of the major female Modernists became better established’, then the focus changed from viewing the work of female and male modernists separately, and moved towards seeing modernism itself as a wider and more varied movement.3Such a departure from the kind of ‘separate development’ situation of early feminist studies noted by both these writers is certainly the kind of procedure one would want to follow in relation to contemporary literary history where women have to a signifi cant extent achieved an equal presence with men on the cultural stage. Yet this situation is a relatively recent phenomenon in EB0024 - MCCULLOCH TEXT.indd 68EB0024 - MCCULLOCH TEXT.indd 686/4/09 16:13:096/4/09 16:13:09
© 2022, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh
Downloaded on 24.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9780748634750-006/html?srsltid=AfmBOopcwZgiWjk1uydpthV_y7-KAwDE23F4g7Xd1Do3o_-OhSzZcjZq
Scroll to top button