Princeton University Press
Words and Distinctions for the Common Good
-
and
About this book
How social scientists' disagreements about their key words and distinctions have been misconceived, and what to do about it
Social scientists do research on a variety of topics—gender, capitalism, populism, and race and ethnicity, among others. They make descriptive and explanatory claims about empathy, intelligence, neoliberalism, and power. They advise policymakers on diversity, digitalization, work, and religion. And yet, as Gabriel Abend points out in this provocative book, they can’t agree on what these things are and how to identify them. How to tell if something is a religion or a cult or a sect? What is empathy? What makes this society a capitalist one? Disputes of this sort arise again and again in the social sciences.
Abend argues that these disagreements have been doubly misconceived. First, they conflate two questions: how a social science community should use its most important words, and what distinctions it should accept and work with. Second, there’s no fact of the matter about either. Instead, they’re practical reason questions for a community, which aim at epistemically and morally good outcomes. Abend calls on social science communities to work together on their words, distinctions, and classifications. They must make collective decisions about the uses of words, the acceptability of distinctions, and the criteria for assessing both. These decisions aren’t up to individual scholars; the community gets the last word. According to Abend, the common good, justice, and equality should play a significant role in the logic of scientific research.
Gabriel Abend is professor of sociology at University of Lucerne and the author of The Moral Background: An Inquiry into the History of Business Ethics (Princeton).
Author / Editor information
Reviews
Topics
-
Download PDFPublicly Available
Frontmatter
i -
Download PDFPublicly Available
Contents
vii -
Download PDFPublicly Available
Abbreviations and typographic conventions
xi -
Download PDFPublicly Available
Prologue (or, will social scientists’ never-ending disputes over words ever end?)
xiii - First Act
-
Download PDFRequires Authentication UnlicensedLicensed
1 Sandwichness wars
3 -
Download PDFRequires Authentication UnlicensedLicensed
2 The problem
32 -
Download PDFRequires Authentication UnlicensedLicensed
3 Nine ways to decline
66 -
Download PDFRequires Authentication UnlicensedLicensed
4 Technical FAQs
98 -
Download PDFRequires Authentication UnlicensedLicensed
5 Two activities
134 -
Download PDFRequires Authentication UnlicensedLicensed
6 Practical reason activities
153 - Second Act
-
Download PDFRequires Authentication UnlicensedLicensed
7 Word first
187 -
Download PDFRequires Authentication UnlicensedLicensed
8 Activity WF and its discontents
211 -
Download PDFRequires Authentication UnlicensedLicensed
9 Distinction first
237 -
Download PDFRequires Authentication UnlicensedLicensed
10 Conversation starters (fragments, sketches, suggestions, doubts)
274 -
Download PDFRequires Authentication UnlicensedLicensed
11 As a matter of fact
308 -
Download PDFRequires Authentication UnlicensedLicensed
Epilogue (so, will social scientists’ never-ending disputes over words ever end?)
333 -
Download PDFRequires Authentication UnlicensedLicensed
Appendix: Make Pluto Great Again
339 -
Download PDFRequires Authentication UnlicensedLicensed
Acknowledgments
369 -
Download PDFRequires Authentication UnlicensedLicensed
References
373 -
Download PDFRequires Authentication UnlicensedLicensed
Index
427 -
Download PDFRequires Authentication UnlicensedLicensed
A NOTE ON THE TYPE
442