Home Self-Restraint: Social Norms, Individualism and the Family
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Self-Restraint: Social Norms, Individualism and the Family

  • John Eekelaar
Published/Copyright: January 15, 2012
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Representations of contemporary individualism as “selfish” can lead to the perception that social and community relationships take place in a normative vacuum, which the law should attempt to fill. In this Article I argue that the representation is inaccurate and that replacing moral or social norms with legal norms carries serious risks. I suggest three models for the relationship between state law and family norms: the “authorization” model; the “delegation” model; and the “purposive abstention” model. Since I maintain that moral and social norms do pertain within families, I argue that the “purposive abstention” model should normally be preferred.

Published Online: 2012-1-15

©2012 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 5.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/1565-3404.1285/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button