Article
Publicly Available
Questioning Harmonization: Legal Transplantation in the Colonial Context
-
David B. Schorr
Published/Copyright:
June 29, 2009
Published Online: 2009-6-29
©2009 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Forum
- A Comment on Christopher Tomlins, Transplants and Timing: Passages in the Creation of an Anglo-American Law of Slavery
- A History of the Present: A Comment on Amalia Kessler, Deciding Against Conciliation: The Nineteenth-Century Rejection of a European Transplant and the Rise of a Distinctively American Ideal of Adversarial Adjudication
- Questioning Harmonization: Legal Transplantation in the Colonial Context
- Comments on Yoram Shachar, Jefferson Goes East: The American Origins of the Israeli Declaration of Independence
- Comment on Pnina Lahav, American Moment[s]
- The Ottoman Roots of Bulgarian Legal Experience: A Comment on Jani Kirov, Foreign Law Between "Grand Hazard" and Great Irritation: The Bulgarian Experience After 1878
Articles in the same Issue
- Forum
- A Comment on Christopher Tomlins, Transplants and Timing: Passages in the Creation of an Anglo-American Law of Slavery
- A History of the Present: A Comment on Amalia Kessler, Deciding Against Conciliation: The Nineteenth-Century Rejection of a European Transplant and the Rise of a Distinctively American Ideal of Adversarial Adjudication
- Questioning Harmonization: Legal Transplantation in the Colonial Context
- Comments on Yoram Shachar, Jefferson Goes East: The American Origins of the Israeli Declaration of Independence
- Comment on Pnina Lahav, American Moment[s]
- The Ottoman Roots of Bulgarian Legal Experience: A Comment on Jani Kirov, Foreign Law Between "Grand Hazard" and Great Irritation: The Bulgarian Experience After 1878