Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Lingual Articulation and Coarticulation for Catalan Consonants and Vowels: An Ultrasound Study

  • and
Published/Copyright: March 7, 2017

Abstract

Background: The study investigates the tongue position and coarticulatory characteristics of a subset of Catalan consonants and vowels using ultrasound. Method: Ultrasound data were recorded and analyzed for the Catalan front lingual consonants /t, d, n, l, ɾ, s, r, ʎ, ɲ, ʃ/ and vowels /i, e, a, o, u/ in symmetrical VCV sequences produced by 5 adult Catalan speakers. Results: Among other aspects, data show more tongue body fronting for palatal consonants and, among dentals and alveolars, for laminals than for apicals; the manner of articulation demands account for considerable tongue body retraction and predorsum lowering during the trill /r/ and for some tongue body retraction during /l/ next to front vowels. Vowel and consonant coarticulation occurs mostly in lingual regions which are not primarily involved in closure or constriction formation. Differences in the relative prominence of the anticipatory and carryover consonant-to-vowel effects in tongue body position were found to hold clearly for /r/ in all vowel contexts and for palatal consonants next to /a, o, u/. Conclusions: Place-dependent and manner-dependent articulatory characteristics for consonants and vowels account for the most relevant coarticulatory effects and may contribute to explain several sound change patterns.


verified



*Daniel Recasens, Departament de Filolologia Catalana, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, ES-08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona (Spain), E-Mail daniel.recasens@uab.es

References

1 Allen B, Pulleyblank D, Aj íbóyè·(2013): Articulatory mapping of Yoruba vowels: an ultrasound study. Phonology 30:183-210.10.1017/S0952675713000110Search in Google Scholar

2 Alwan A, Narayanan S, Haker K (1997): Toward articulatory-acoustic models for liquid approximants based on MRI and EPG data. II. The rhotics. J Acoust Soc Am 101:1078-1089.10.1121/1.417972Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3 Boyce S, Hamilton SM, Rivera-Campos A (2016): Acquiring rhoticity across languages: an ultrasound study of differentiating tongue movements. Clin Linguist Phonet 30:174-201.10.3109/02699206.2015.1127999Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4 Browman CP, Goldstein L (1995): Gestural syllable position effects in American English; in Bell-Berti F, Raphael LJ (eds): A festschrift for Katherine Safford Harris. Woodbury, American Institute of Physics, pp 19-34.Search in Google Scholar

5 Dart S (1991): Articulatory and acoustic properties of apical and laminal articulations. UCLA Work Pap Phonet 79:1-15.Search in Google Scholar

6 Davidson L (2006): Comparing tongue shapes from ultrasound imaging using smoothing spline analysis of variance. J Acoust Soc Am 120:407-415.10.1121/1.2205133Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7 Davidson L (2012): Ultrasound as a tool for speech research; in Cohn AC, Fougeron C, Huffman MK (eds): The Oxford Handbook of Laboratory Phonology. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp 484-496.Search in Google Scholar

8 Farnetani E, Recasens D (1993): Anticipatory consonant-to-vowel coarticulation in the production of VCV sequences in Italian. Lang Speech 36:279-302.10.1177/002383099303600309Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9 Fitch W, Giedd J (1999): Morphology and development of the human vocal tract: a study using magnetic resonance imaging. J Acoust Soc Am 106:1511-1522.10.1121/1.427148Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10 Geng C (2008): A Cross-Linguistic Study of Speech Movements; PhD dissertation, Humboldt University, Berlin.Search in Google Scholar

11 Kochetov A, Sreedevi N (2016): Articulation and acoustics of Kannada affricates: a case of geminate /ʧ/. Clin Linguist Phonet 30:202-226.10.3109/02699206.2015.1080762Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12 Lee-Kim S-I, Davidson L, Hwang S (2013): Morphological effects on the darkness of English intervocalic /l/. Lab Phonol 4:475-511.10.1515/lp-2013-0015Search in Google Scholar

13 Mielke J (2015): An ultrasound study of Canadian French rhotic vowels with polar smoothing spline comparisons. J Acoust Soc Am 137:2858-2869.10.1121/1.4919346Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14 Narayanan SS, Alwan AA (1997): Toward articulatory-acoustic models for liquid approximants based on MRI and EPG data. I. The laterals. J Acoust Soc Am 101:1064-1077.10.1121/1.418030Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15 Narayanan SS, Alwan AA, Haker K (1995): An articulatory study of fricative consonants using magnetic resonance imaging. J Acoust Soc Am 98:1325-1347.10.1121/1.413469Search in Google Scholar

16 Ohala JJ, Solé MJ (2010): Turbulence in pho nology; in Fuchs S, Toda M, Zygis M (eds): Turbulent Sounds: An Interdisciplinary Guide. Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter, pp 37-97.Search in Google Scholar

17 Proctor MI (2009): Gestural Characterization of a Phonological Class: The Liquids; PhD dissertation, Yale University.Search in Google Scholar

18 R Development Core Team (2012): R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org.Search in Google Scholar

19 Recasens D (1999): Lingual coarticulation; in Hardcastle WJ, Hewlett N (eds): Coarticulation: Theory, Data and Techniques. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp 80-104.Search in Google Scholar

20 Recasens D (2013): On the articulatory classification of (alveolo)palatal consonants. J Int Phonet Assoc 43:1-23.10.1017/S0025100312000199Search in Google Scholar

21 Recasens D, Espinosa A (2009): An articulatory investigation of lingual coarticulatory resistance and aggressiveness for consonants and vowels in Catalan. J Acoust Soc Am 125:2288-2298.10.1121/1.3089222Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22 Recasens D, Espinosa A (2010): Lingual kinematics and coarticulation for alveolopalatal and velar consonants in Catalan. J Acoust Soc Am 127:3154-3165.10.1121/1.3372631Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23 Recasens D, Rodríguez C (2016): A study on coarticulatory resistance and aggressiveness for front lingual consonants and vowels using ultrasound. J Phonet 59:58-75.10.1016/j.wocn.2016.09.002Search in Google Scholar

24 Scobbie JM, Punnoose R, Khattab G (2013): Articulating five liquids: a single speaker ultrasound study of Malayalam; in Spreafico L, Vietti A (eds): Rhotics: New Data and Perspectives. Bolzano, Bolzano University Press, pp 99-124.Search in Google Scholar

25 Solé MJ (2002): Aerodynamic characteristics of trills and phonological patterning. J Phonet 30:655-688.10.1006/jpho.2002.0179Search in Google Scholar

26 Sproat R, Fujimura·(1993): Allophonic variation in English /l/ and its implications for phonetic implementation. J Phonet 21:291-311.10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31340-3Search in Google Scholar

27 Wood SA (1979): A radiographic analysis of constriction locations for vowels. J Phonet 7:25-43.10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31031-9Search in Google Scholar

28 Wood SA (1982): X-Ray and Model Studies of Vowel Articulation. Lund Working Papers No 23. Lund, Department of Linguistics, Lund University.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-02-29
Accepted: 2016-10-05
Published Online: 2017-03-07
Published in Print: 2017-09-01

© 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel

Downloaded on 2.4.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1159/000452475/html
Scroll to top button