The Vowel Systems of Quichua-Spanish Bilinguals

References

1 Anisfeld, M.; Anisfeld, E.; Semogas, R.: Cross-influences between the phonological systems of Lithuanian-English bilinguals. J. verbal Learn. verbal Behav. 8: 257–261 (1969).10.1016/S0022-5371(69)80072-1Search in Google Scholar

2 Anisfeld, M.; Gordon, M.: An effect of a German-language course on English. Lang. Speech 14: 289–292 (1971).10.1177/002383097101400309Search in Google Scholar

3 Best, C.T.: Emergence of language-specific constraints in perception of non-native speech: a window on early phonological development; in de Boysson-Bardies, de Schonen, Jusczyk, MacNeilage, Morton, Developmental neurocognition: speech and face processing in the first year of life, pp. 289–304 (Kluwer, Dordrecht 1993).10.1007/978-94-015-8234-6_24Search in Google Scholar

4 Best, C.T.: A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception; in Strange, Speech perception and linguistic experience: issues in cross-language research, pp. 171–204 (York, Timonium 1995).Search in Google Scholar

5 Best, C.T.; McRoberts, G.W.; Goodell, E.: Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listeners’ native phonological system. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 109: 775–794 (2001).10.1121/1.1332378Search in Google Scholar

6 Best, C.T.; McRoberts, G.W.; Sithole, N.M.: Examination of perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. J. exp. Psychol. hum. Perception Performance 14: 345–360 (1988).10.1037/0096-1523.14.3.345Search in Google Scholar

7 Birdsong, D. (ed.): Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (Erlbaum, Mahwah 1999).10.4324/9781410601667Search in Google Scholar

8 de Boer, B.: Self-organization in vowel systems. J. Phonet. 28: 441–465 (2000).10.1006/jpho.2000.0125Search in Google Scholar

9 Bohn, O.-S.; Flege, J.E.: The production of new and similar vowels by adult German learners of English. SSLA 14: 131–158 (1992).10.1017/S0272263100010792Search in Google Scholar

10 Bosch, L.; Costa, A.; Sebastián-Galles, N.: First- and second-language vowel perception in early bilinguals. Eur. J. cogn. Psychol. 12: 189–221 (2000).10.1080/09541446.2000.10590222Search in Google Scholar

11 Bradlow, A.R.: A comparative acoustic study of English and Spanish vowels. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 97: 1916–1924 (1995).10.1121/1.412064Search in Google Scholar

12 Caramazza, A.; Yeni-Komshian, G.H.: Voice onset time in two French dialects. J. Phonet. 2: 239–245 (1974).10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31274-4Search in Google Scholar

13 Caramazza, A.; Yeni-Komshian, G.H.; Zurif, E.B.; Carbone E.: The acquisition of a new phonological contrast: the case of stop consonants in French-English bilinguals. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 54: 421–428 (1973).10.1121/1.1913594Search in Google Scholar

14 Chee, M.; Tan, E.; Thiel, T.: Mandarin and English single word processing studies with functional magnetic resonance imaging. J. Neurosci. 19: 3050–3056 (1999).10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-08-03050.1999Search in Google Scholar

15 Cole, P.: Imbabura Quechua; in the Lingua Descriptive Studies series (North-Holland, Amsterdam 1982).Search in Google Scholar

16 Crothers, J.: Typological and universals of vowel systems; in Greenberg, Universals of human language, vol. 2, Phonology, pp. 93–152 (Stanford University Press, Stanford 1978).Search in Google Scholar

17 Disner, S.: Vowel quality: the relation between universal and language-specific factors. UCLA Working Papers Phonet. 58: (1983).Search in Google Scholar

18 Flege, J.E.: The production of ‘new’ and ‘similar’ phones in a foreign language: evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. J. Phonet. 15: 47–65 (1987).10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30537-6Search in Google Scholar

19 Flege, J.E.: Second-language speech learning: theory, findings and problems; in Strange, Speech perception and linguistic experience: issues in cross-language research, pp. 233–273 (York, Timonium 1995).Search in Google Scholar

20 Flege, J.E.; Eefting, W.: Production and perception of English stops by native Spanish speakers. J. Phonet. 15: 67–83 (1987a).10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30538-8Search in Google Scholar

21 Flege J.; Eefting, W.: Cross-language switching in stop consonant perception and production by Dutch speaker of English. Speech Commun. 6: 185–202 (1987b).10.1016/0167-6393(87)90025-2Search in Google Scholar

22 Flege, J.; Hillenbrand, J.: Limits on phonetic accuracy in foreign language speech production. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 76: 708–721 (1984).10.1121/1.391257Search in Google Scholar

23 Fujisaki, H.; Kawashima, T.: The roles of pitch and the higher formants in the perception of vowels. IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust. 16: 73–77 (1968).10.1109/TAU.1968.1161952Search in Google Scholar

24 Grosjean, F.: Life with two languages (Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1982).Search in Google Scholar

25 Guion, S.G.; Flege, J.E.; Akahane-Yamada, R.; Pruitt, J.C.: An investigation of current models of second language speech perception: The case of Japanese adults’ perception of English consonants. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 107: 2711–2724 (2000).10.1121/1.428657Search in Google Scholar

26 Haugen, E.: Bilingualism in the Americas: a bibliography and guide for research (Publications of the American Dialect Society, No. 26, 1957).Search in Google Scholar

27 Hazan, V.L.; Boulakia, G.: Perception and production of a voicing contrast by French-English bilinguals. Lang. Speech 36: 17–38 (1993).10.1177/002383099303600102Search in Google Scholar

28 Honikman, B.: Articulatory settings; in Abercrombie, In Honour of Daniel Jones, pp. 73–84 (Longmans, London 1964).Search in Google Scholar

29 Illes, J.; Francis, W.; Desmond, J.; Gabrieli, J.; Glover, G.; Poldrack, R.; Lee, C.; Wagner, A.: Convergent cortical representation of semantic processing in bilinguals. Brain Lang. 70: 347–363 (1999).10.1006/brln.1999.2186Search in Google Scholar

30 Jongman, A.; Fourakis, M.; Sereno, J.A.: The acoustic vowel space of modern Greek and German. Lang. Speech 32: 221–248 (1989).10.1177/002383098903200303Search in Google Scholar

31 Kim, K.; Relkin, N.; Lee, K.-M.; Hirsch, J.: Distinct cortical areas associated with native and second languages. Nature 388: 171–174 (1997).10.1038/40623Search in Google Scholar

32 Kuhl, P.K.: Human adults and human infants show a ‘perceptual magnet effect’ for prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception Psychophysics 50: 93–107 (1991).10.3758/BF03212211Search in Google Scholar

33 Kuhl, P.K.: A new view of language acquisition. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 11850–11857 (2000).10.1073/pnas.97.22.11850Search in Google Scholar

34 Kuhl, P.K.; Williams, K.A.; Lacerda, F.; Stevens, K.N.; Lindblom, B.: Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science 255: 606–608 (1992).10.1126/science.1736364Search in Google Scholar

35 Lado, R.: Linguistics across cultures: applied linguistics for language teachers (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor 1957).Search in Google Scholar

36 Liljencrants, J.; Lindblom, B.: Numerical simulations of vowel quality systems: the role of perceptual contrast. Language 48: 839–862 (1972).10.2307/411991Search in Google Scholar

37 Lindblom, B.: Phonetic universals in vowel systems; in Ohala, Jaeger, Experimental phonology, pp. 13–44 (Academic Press, New York 1986).Search in Google Scholar

38 Lindblom, B.: Systemic constraints and adaptive change in the formation of sound structures; in Hurford, Studdert-Kennedy, Knight, Approaches to the Evolution of Language: Social and Cognitive Bases, pp. 242–264 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1998).Search in Google Scholar

39 Lindblom, B.; Engstrand, O.: In what sense is speech quantal? J. Phonet. 17: 107–121 (1989).10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31516-5Search in Google Scholar

40 Lindblom, B.; MacNeilage, P.F.; Studdert-Kennedy, M.: Self-organizing processes and the explanation of phonological universals; in Butterworth, Comrie, Dahl, Explanations for language universals, pp. 181–203 (Mouton, Berlin 1984).10.1515/ling.1983.21.1.181Search in Google Scholar

41 Lindblom, B.; Maddieson, I.: Phonetic universals in consonant systems; in Hyman, Li, Language, speech, and mind, pp. 62–78 (Routledge, New York 1988).Search in Google Scholar

42 Mack, M.: Phonetic transfer in a French-English bilingual child; in Nelde, Attitudes and language conflict, pp. 107–124 (Duemmler, Bonn 1990).Search in Google Scholar

43 Maddieson, I.: Patterns of sounds. Cambridge studies in speech science and communication (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1984).Search in Google Scholar

44 Mendez, A.: Production of American English and Spanish vowels. Lang. Speech 25: 191–197 (1982).10.1177/002383098202500206Search in Google Scholar

45 Nearey, T.: Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 85: 2088–2113 (1989).Search in Google Scholar

46 Nosofsky, R.M.: Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. J. exp. Psychol.: Gen. 115: 39–57 (1986).Search in Google Scholar

47 Peng, S.-H.: Cross-language influence on the production of Mandarin /f/ and /x/ and Taiwanese /h/ by native speakers of Taiwanese Amoy. Phonetica 50: 245–260 (1993).10.1159/000261945Search in Google Scholar

48 Perani, D.; Dehaene, S.; Grassi, F.; Cohen, L.; Cappa, S.F.; Duboux, E.; Fazio, F.; Mehler, J.: Brain processing of native and foreign languages. NeuroReport 7: 2439–2444 (1996).10.1097/00001756-199611040-00007Search in Google Scholar

49 Pisoni, D.; Lively, S.; Logan, J.: Perceptual learning of nonnative speech contrasts: implication of theories of speech perception; in Goodman, Nusbaum, The development of speech perception: the transition from speech sounds to spoken words, pp. 121–166 (MIT Press, Cambridge 1994).Search in Google Scholar

50 Sancier, M.L.; Fowler, C.A.: Gestural drift in a bilingual speaker of Brazilian Portuguese and English. J. Phonet. 35: 421–436 (1997).10.1006/jpho.1997.0051Search in Google Scholar

51 Schouten, M.: Imitation of synthetic vowels by bilinguals. J. Phonet. 5: 273–283 1977.10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31141-6Search in Google Scholar

52 Schwartz, J.-L.; Boë, L.-J.; Vallée, N.; Abry, C.: Major trends in vowel system inventories. J. Phonet. 25: 233–253 (1997a).10.1006/jpho.1997.0044Search in Google Scholar

53 Schwartz, J.-L.; Boë, L.-J.; Vallée, N.; Abry, C.: The dispersion-focalization theory of vowel systems. J. Phonet. 25: 255–286 (1997b).10.1006/jpho.1997.0043Search in Google Scholar

54 Sebastián-Galles, N.; Soto-Faraco, S.: Online processing of native and non-native phonemic contrasts in early bilinguals. Cognition 72: 111–123 (1999).10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00024-4Search in Google Scholar

55 Stevens, K.: On the quantal nature of speech. J. Phonet. 17: 3–45 (1989).10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31520-7Search in Google Scholar

56 Stockwell, R.; Bowen, J.: The Sounds of English and Spanish (University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1965).Search in Google Scholar

57 Strange, W.; Akahane-Yamada, R.; Kubo, R.; Trent, S.; Nishi, K.; Jenkins, J.: Perceptual assimilation of American English vowels by Japanese listeners. J. Phonet. 26: 311–344 (1998).10.1006/jpho.1998.0078Search in Google Scholar

58 Swadesh, M: Observations of pattern impact on the phonetics of bilinguals; in Spier, Hallowell, Newman, Language, culture, and personality: essays in memory of Edward Sapir, pp. 59–65 (Sapir Memorial Publication Fund, Menasha 1941).Search in Google Scholar

59 Traunmüller, H.: Analytical expression for the tonotopic sensory scale. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 88: 97–100 (1990).10.1121/1.399849Search in Google Scholar

60 Wardaugh, R.: The contrastive analysis hypothesis. TESOL Q. 4: 123–130 (1970).10.2307/3586182Search in Google Scholar

61 Weber-Fox, C.; Neville, H.: Functional neural subsystems are differentially affected by delays in second language immersion: ERP and behavioral evidence in bilinguals; in Birdsong, Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis, pp. 23–38 (Erlbaum, Mahwah 1999).Search in Google Scholar

62 Weinreich, U.: Languages in contact (Mouton, The Hague 1974) (Publication of the Linguistic Circle of Yew York, New York 1953).Search in Google Scholar

63 Weinreich, U.: On the description of phonetic interference. Word 13: 1–11 (1957).10.1080/00437956.1957.11659624Search in Google Scholar

64 Werker, J.F.: Becoming a native listener. Am. Scient. 77: 54–59 (1989).Search in Google Scholar

65 Werker, J.F.; Pegg, J.E.: Infant speech perception and phonological acquisition; in Ferguson, Menn, Stoel-Gammon, Phonological development: models, research, implications, pp. 285–311 (York, Timonium 1992).Search in Google Scholar

66 Werker, J.F.; Tees, R.C.: Cross-language speech perception: evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior Dev. 7: 49–63 (1984).10.1016/S0163-6383(84)80022-3Search in Google Scholar

67 Williams, L.: The perception of stop consonant voicing by Spanish-English bilinguals. Perception Psychophysics 21: 289–297 (1977).10.3758/BF03199477Search in Google Scholar

68 Williams, L.: The modification of speech perception and production in second-language learning. Perception Psychophysics 26: 95–104 (1979).10.3758/BF03208301Search in Google Scholar

69 Winkler, I.; Kujala, T.; Tiitinen, H.; Sivonen, P.; Alku, P.; Lehtokoski, A.; Czigler, I.; Csépe, V.; Ilmoniemi, R.J.; Näätänen, R.: Brain responses reveal the learning of foreign language phonemes. Psychophysiology 36: 638–642 (1999).10.1111/1469-8986.3650638Search in Google Scholar

70 Yang, B.: A comparative study of American English and Korean vowels produced by male and female speakers. J. Phonet. 24: 245–261 (1996).10.1006/jpho.1996.0013Search in Google Scholar