Perceiving Final Voiceless Stops without Release: Effects of Preceding Monophthongs versus Nonmonophthongs

Leigh Lisker

doi:10.1159/000028440

Article

Perceiving Final Voiceless Stops without Release: Effects of Preceding Monophthongs versus Nonmonophthongs

Leigh Lisker

Published/Copyright: July 21, 1999

Published by

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Submit Manuscript Author Information Explore this Subject

From the journal Phonetica Volume 56 Issue 1-2

Abstract

Prepausal postvocalic stops in English are reported to occur both with and without audible release bursts, more or less randomly, and this difference is said to be without distinctive function. However, there is evidence that an English final stop, absent its release, may be of reduced intelligibility, particularly as to its place of articulation. Without audible release a final stop’s place is conveyed mainly, perhaps entirely, by frequency shifts in the vowel formants. Among the vowels of English some are diphthongal, a property also signaled by formant shifts. The question arises: Is the intelligibility of an unreleased stop significantly affected by the phonetic nature of the vowel? Perceptual testing of appropriately chosen nonsense monosyllables ending in [p⌍ t⌍ k⌍] indicates that these stops are generally somewhat less intelligible after diphthongs. However, not all three stops are affected equally, [k⌍] perception being especially reduced in this context.

verified

References

1 Byrd, D.: 54,000 American Stops. UCLA Working Papers Phonet. 83: 1–19 (1993).Search in Google Scholar

2 Crystal, T.H.; House, A.S.: Segmental durations in connected-speech signals: current results. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 83: 1553–1585 (1998).10.1121/1.395911Search in Google Scholar

3 Delattre, P.: Unreleased velar plosives after back-rounded vowels. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 30: 581–582 (1958).10.1121/1.1909696Search in Google Scholar

4 Gimson, A.C.: An introduction to the pronunciation of English (Arnold, London 1962).Search in Google Scholar

5 Halle, M.; Hughes, G.W.; Radley, J.-P.A.: Acoustic properties of stop consonants. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 29: 107–116 (1957).10.1121/1.1908634Search in Google Scholar

6 Henton, C.; Ladefoged, P.; Maddieson, I.: Stops in the world’s languages. Phonetica 49: 49–65 (1992).10.1159/000261905Search in Google Scholar

7 Householder, F.W. Jr.: Unreleased PTK in American English; in Halle, Lunt, McLean, van Schooneveld, For Roman Jakobson, pp. 235–244 (Mouton, The Hague 1956).Search in Google Scholar

8 Keating, P.A.; Byrd, D.; Flemming, E.; Todaka, Y.: Phonetic analyses of word and segment variation using the TIMIT corpus of American English. Speech Commun. 14: 131–142 (1994).10.1016/0167-6393(94)90004-3Search in Google Scholar

9 Lisker, L.: The effect of glides on following implosive transitions. Haskins Laboratories, 24th Quarterly Progress Report, App. 12 (1957).Search in Google Scholar

10 Lisker, L.: The effect of glides on terminal implosive transitions, App. 4 (1958).Malécot, A.: The role of releases in the identification of released final stops: a series of tape-cutting experiments. Language 34: 370–380 (1958).Search in Google Scholar

11 Parker, F.; Walsh, T.: Voicing cues as a function of the tense/lax distinction in vowels. J. Phonet. 9: 353–358 (1981).10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30969-6Search in Google Scholar

12 Trager, G.L.; Smith, H.L. Jr.: An outline of English structure (Battenburg Press, Norman 1951).Search in Google Scholar

13 Wang, W.S.-Y.: Transition and release as perceptual cues for final plosives. J. Speech Hear. Res. 2: 66–73 (1959).10.1044/jshr.0201.66Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 1999-07-21

Published in Print: 1999-06-01

You are currently not able to access this content.

Articles in the same Issue

https://doi.org/10.1159/000028440