Home Acoustic Characteristics of Greek Vowels
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Acoustic Characteristics of Greek Vowels

  • Marios Fourakis , Antonis Botinis and Maria Katsaiti
Published/Copyright: July 21, 1999

Abstract

Five male speakers produced the vowels of Greek at slow and fast tempo, in lexically stressed and unstressed syllables, and in lexically stressed syllables of words appearing in focus position. Duration, fundamental frequency (F₀), amplitude, and the frequencies of the first (F<sub>1</sub>) and second formant (F<sub>2</sub>) were measured. The effects on these variables of the phonemic category of the vowel, tempo, stress, and focus were examined. The results indicated that the vowel system of Greek follows universal tendencies in terms of duration but not in terms of F₀ and amplitude. Vowels in focus position, when plotted by their F<sub>1</sub> and F<sub>2</sub> frequencies, defined a vowel space larger than that defined by vowels in any other condition.


verified


References

1 Antoniadis, Z.; Strube, H.W.: Untersuchungen zum &lsquo;intrinsic pitch&rsquo; deutscher Vokale. Phonetica 38: 277&ndash;290 (1981).10.1159/000260033Search in Google Scholar

2 Beckman, M.E.: Stress and non-stress accent (Foris, Riverton 1986).10.1515/9783110874020Search in Google Scholar

3 Botinis, A.: Stress and prosodic structure in Greek (Lund University Press, Lund 1989).Search in Google Scholar

4 Botinis, A.; Bannert, R.: Tonal perception of focus in Greek and Swedish. ESCA Workshop on Intonation, Athens 1997.Search in Google Scholar

5 Botinis, A.; Fourakis, M.; Hawks, J.W.: A perceptual study of the Greek vowel space using synthetic stimuli. Proc. 5th Eur. Conf. on Speech Commun. Technol., vol. 3, pp. 1307&ndash;1310 (1977).Search in Google Scholar

6 Bradlow, A.: A comparative acoustic study of English and Spanish vowels. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 97: 1916&ndash;1924 (1995).10.1121/1.412064Search in Google Scholar

7 Crystal, T.H.; House, A.S.: The duration of American English vowels: an overview. J. Phonet. 16: 263&ndash;284 (1988).10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30500-5Search in Google Scholar

8 Dauer, R.: Stress and rhythm in Modern Greek; PhD diss. University of Edinburgh (1980).Search in Google Scholar

9 Di Cristo, A.; Hirst, D.J.: Modelling French micromelody: analysis and synthesis. Phonetica 43: 11&ndash;30 (1986).10.1159/000261758Search in Google Scholar

10 Fant, G.: Acoustic theory of speech production (Mouton, The Hague 1960).Search in Google Scholar

11 Fischer-J&oslash;rgensen, E.: Intrinsic F0 in tense and lax vowels with special reference to German. Phonetica 47: 99&ndash;140 (1990).10.1159/000261858Search in Google Scholar

12 Fourakis, M.: An acoustic study of the effects of tempo and stress on segmental intervals in Modern Greek. Phonetic 43: 172&ndash;188 (1986).10.1159/000261769Search in Google Scholar

13 Fourakis, M.: Tempo, stress, and vowel reduction in American English. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 90: 1816&ndash;1827 (1991).Search in Google Scholar

14 Gopal, H.S.: Generalizability of current models of vowel duration. Phonetica 53: 1&ndash;32 (1996).10.1159/000262187Search in Google Scholar

15 Gopal, H.S.; Syrdal, A.K.: Effects of speaking rate on temporal and spectral characteristics of American English vowels. MIT Speech Commun. Group Working Papers, III, pp. 162&ndash;180 (1988).Search in Google Scholar

16 Hawks, J.W.; Fourakis, M.: Perception of synthetic vowels by native speakers of American English and Modern Greek. Lang. Speech 38: 237&ndash;252 (1995).10.1177/002383099503800302Search in Google Scholar

17 Honda, K.: Relationship between pitch control and vowel articulation; in Bless, Abbs, Vocal fold physiology, pp. 286&ndash;299 (College Hill Press, San Diego 1983).Search in Google Scholar

18 Jongman, A.; Fourakis, M.; Sereno, J.A.: The acoustic vowel space of Modern Greek and German. Lang. Speech 32: 221&ndash;248 (1989).10.1177/002383098903200303Search in Google Scholar

19 Joseph, B.D.: Philippaki-Warburton, I.: Modern Greek (Croom Helm, London 1987).Search in Google Scholar

20 Klatt, D.H.: Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: acoustic and perceptual evidence. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 59: 1208&ndash;1221 (1976).10.1121/1.380986Search in Google Scholar

21 Koutsoudas, A.; Koutsoudas, O.: A contrastive analysis of the segmental phonemes of Greek and English. Lang. Learning 12: 211&ndash;230 (1962).10.1111/j.1467-1770.1962.tb01251.xSearch in Google Scholar

22 Ladd, D.R.; Silverman, K.E.A.: Vowel intrinsic pitch in connected speech. Phonetica 41: 31&ndash;40 (1984).10.1159/000261708Search in Google Scholar

23 Lehiste, I.: Suprasegmentals (MIT Press, Cambridge 1970).Search in Google Scholar

24 Lehiste, I.; Peterson, G.E.: Vowel amplitude and phonemic stress in American English. J acoust. Soc. Am. 31: 428&ndash;435 (1959).10.1121/1.1907729Search in Google Scholar

25 Lehiste, I.; Peterson, G.E.: Some basic considerations in the analysis of intonation. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 33: 419&ndash;425 (1961).10.1121/1.1908681Search in Google Scholar

26 Leoni, F.A.; Cutugno, F.; Savy, R.: The vowel system of Italian connected speech. Proc. 13th ICPhS, vol. 4, pp. 396&ndash;399 (Stockholm 1995).Search in Google Scholar

27 Lindblom, B.: Explaining phonetic variation: a sketch of the H &amp; H theory; in Hardcastle, Marchal, Speech production and speech modelling, pp. 403&ndash;439 (Academic Press, New York 1989).10.1007/978-94-009-2037-8_16Search in Google Scholar

28 Mackridge, P.: The Modern Greek language: a descriptive analysis of Standard Modern Greek (Oxford University Press, Oxford 1985).Search in Google Scholar

29 Moon, S.-J.; Lindblom, B.: Interaction between duration, context, and speaking style in English stressed vowels. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 96: 4&ndash;55 (1994).Search in Google Scholar

30 Ohala, J.; Eukel, B.W.: Explaining the intrinsic pitch of vowels. Rep. Phonol. Lab. Univ. Calif. Berkeley, vol. 3, pp. 118&ndash;125 (1978).Search in Google Scholar

31 O&rsquo;Shaughnessy, D.: A study of French vowel and consonant durations. J. Phonet. 9: 385&ndash;406 (1981).10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31016-2Search in Google Scholar

32 Sapir, S.: The intrinsic pitch of vowels: theoretical, physiological, and clinical considerations. J. Voice 3: 44&ndash;51 (1989).Search in Google Scholar

33 Sluijter, A.M.C.: Phonetic correlates of stress and accent (Holland Academic Graphics, The Hague 1995).Search in Google Scholar

34 Turner, G.S.; Tjaden, K.; Weismer, G.: The influence of speaking rate on vowel space and speech intelligibility for individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J. Speech Hear. Res. 38: 1001&ndash;1013 (1995).10.1044/jshr.3805.1001Search in Google Scholar

35 Van Son, R.J.J.H.; Pols, L.C.W.: Formant movements of Dutch vowels in a text, read at normal and fast rate. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 92: 121&ndash;127 (1992).10.1121/1.404277Search in Google Scholar

36 Vilkman, E.; Aaltonen, O.; Raimo, I.; Arajarvi, P.; Oksanen, H.: Vertical hyoid-laryngeal changes vs. crico-thyroid muscle activity in the control of intrinsic F0 of vowels. J. Phonet. 17: 193&ndash;203 (1989).10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30429-2Search in Google Scholar

37 Whalen, D.H.; Levitt, A.G.: The universality of intrinsic F0 of vowels. J. Phonet. 23: 349&ndash;366 (1995).10.1016/S0095-4470(95)80165-0Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 1999-07-21
Published in Print: 1999-06-01

© 1999 S. Karger AG, Basel

Downloaded on 20.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1159/000028439/html
Scroll to top button