The Effect of Speaking Style on a Locus Equation Characterization of Stop Place of Articulation

References

1 Bakran, J.; Mildner, V.: Effect of speech and coarticulation strategies on the locus equation determination; in Proc. 13th Int. Congr. Phonet. Sci., Stockholm, 1995, vol. I, pp. 26–29.Search in Google Scholar

2 Bergem, D. van: Acoustic and lexical vowel reduction. Stud. Lang. Lang. Use, vol. 16 (ICC-Printing, Dordrecht/ Amsterdam 1995).Search in Google Scholar

3 Brancazio, L.; Fowler, C.A.: On the relevance of locus equations for production and perception of stop consonants. Perception Psychophysics 60: 24–50 (1998).10.3758/BF03211916Search in Google Scholar

4 Brownlee, S.A.: The role of sentence stress in vowel reduction and formant undershoot: a study of lab speech and informal, spontaneous speech; PhD diss. Department of Linguistics, University of Texas, Austin (1996).Search in Google Scholar

5 Celdran, E.M.; Villalba, X.: Locus equations as a metric for place of articulation in automatic speech recognition; in Proc. 13th Int. Congr. Phonet. Sci., Stockholm, 1995, vol. I, pp. 30–33.Search in Google Scholar

6 Churchland, P.; Sejnowski, T.: Neural representation and neural computation; in Nadel, Cooper, Culicover, Hornish, Neural connections, mental computation, pp. 15–48 (MIT, Cambridge 1989).Search in Google Scholar

7 Crowther, C.S.: Modelling coarticulation and place of articulation using locus equations. UCLA Working Papers Phonet. 88: 127–148 (1994).Search in Google Scholar

8 Duez, D.: Second formant locus-nucleus patterns in spontaneous speech: some preliminary results on French. Phonet. Exp. Res. Inst. Ling., University of Stockholm, pp. 109–114 (1989).Search in Google Scholar

9 Elman, J.L., McClelland, J.L.: Exploiting lawful variability in the speech wave; in Perkell and Klatt, Invariance and Variability in speech processes, pp. 360–385 (Lawrence Erlbaum, N.J., 1986).Search in Google Scholar

10 Engstrand, O.: Articulatory correlates of stress and speaking rate in Swedish VCV utterances. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 83: 1863–1875 (1988).10.1121/1.396522Search in Google Scholar

11 Fant, G.; Stålhammar, U.; Karlsson, I.: Swedish vowels in speech material of various complexity; in Fant, Proc. Speech Commun. Semin., vol. 2 (Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm 1974).Search in Google Scholar

12 Flege, J.E.: Effects of speaking rate on tongue position and velocity of movement in vowel production. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 84: 901–916 (1988).10.1121/1.396659Search in Google Scholar

13 Fourakis, M.: Tempo, stress, and vowel reduction in American English. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 90: 1816–1827 (1991).Search in Google Scholar

14 Fowler, C.A.: Invariants, specifiers, cues: an investigation of locus equations as information for place of articulation. Perception Psychophysics 55: 597–610 (1994).Search in Google Scholar

15 Fruchter, D.; Sussman, H.M.: The perceptual relevance of locus equations. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 102: 2997–3008 (1997).10.1121/1.421012Search in Google Scholar

16 Gay, T.: Effect of speaking rate on vowel formant movements. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 2: 47–63 (1978).10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31176-3Search in Google Scholar

17 Hinton, G.E.; Lang, K.J.: The development of the time-delay neural network architecture for speech recognition. Techn. Rep. Carnegie Mellon Univ. CMU-CS 88–152.Search in Google Scholar

18 Johnson, K.: Speech perception without speaker normalization; in Johnson, Mullennix, Talker variability in speech processing, pp. 145–165 (Academic Press, New York 1997).Search in Google Scholar

19 Johnson, K.; Mullennix, J.W.: Talker variability in speech processing (Academic Press, New York 1997).Search in Google Scholar

20 Joos, M.: Acoustic phonetics, LSA (Waverly Press, Baltimore 1948).10.2307/522229Search in Google Scholar

21 Koopmans-Van Beinum, F.J.: Vowel contrast reduction, an acoustic and perceptual study of Dutch vowels in various speech conditions; PhD diss. University of Amsterdam (Academische Per B.V., Amsterdam 1980).Search in Google Scholar

22 Krull, D.: Acoustic properties as predictors of perceptual responses: a study of Swedish voiced stops. Phonet. Exp. Res. Inst. Ling., Univ. Stockh. (PERILUS) 7: 66–70 (1988).Search in Google Scholar

23 Krull, D.: Second formant locus patterns and consonant-vowel coarticulation in spontaneous speech. Phonet. Exp. Res. Inst. Ling., Univ. Stockh. (PERILUS) 10: 87–108 (1989).Search in Google Scholar

24 Kuehn, D.P.; Moll, K.L.: A cineradiographic study of VC and CV articulatory velocities. J. Phonet. 4: 303–320 (1976).10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31257-4Search in Google Scholar

25 Liberman, A.; Mattingly, I.: The motor theory of speech perception, revised. Cognition 21: 1–36 (1985).10.1016/0010-0277(85)90021-6Search in Google Scholar

26 Lindblom, B.: On vowel reduction. Q. Prog. Status Rep., Speech Transm. Lab., R. Inst. Technol., Stockh., No. 29 (1963a).Search in Google Scholar

27 Lindblom, B.: Spectrographic study of vowel reduction. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 35: 1773–1781 (1963b).10.1121/1.1918816Search in Google Scholar

28 Lindblom, B.: Explaining phonetic variation: a sketch of the H and H theory; in Hardcastle, Marchal, Speech production and perception modeling, pp. 403–440 (Kluwer, The Netherlands 1990).10.1007/978-94-009-2037-8_16Search in Google Scholar

29 McDermott, E.; Katagiri, S.: Phoneme recognition using Kohonen’s Learning Vector Quantization. ATR Workshop on Neural Networks and Parallel Distributed Processing, Japan 1988.Search in Google Scholar

30 Moon, S.-J.; Lindblom, B.: Interaction between duration, context, and speaking style in English stressed vowels. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 1994; 96: 40–55.10.1121/1.410492Search in Google Scholar

31 Nearey, T.; Shammass, S.E.: Formant transitions as partly distinctive invariant properties in the identification of voiced stops. Can. J. Acoustics 15: 17–24 (1987).Search in Google Scholar

32 Nord, L.: Vowel reduction: centralization of contextual assimilation? In Fant, Proc. Speech Commun. Semin., vol. 2, pp. 149–154 (Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm 1975).Search in Google Scholar

33 Nord, L.: Acoustic studies of vowel reduction in Swedish. Q. Prog. Status Rep., Speech Transm. Lab., R. Inst. Technol., Stockh., No. 4, pp. 19–36 (1986).Search in Google Scholar

34 Obermayer, K.; Ritter, H.J.; Schulten, K.J.: Development and spatial structure of cortical feature maps: a model study; in Lippmann, Moody, Touretzky, Advances in neural information process-systems (Morgan-Kaufman, San Francisco 1991).Search in Google Scholar

35 Pisoni, D.B.: Some thoughts on ‘normalization’ in speech perception. Res on Spoken Lang. Processing. Progr. Rep. No. 20, pp. 5–29 (Speech Research Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Indiana University, Bloomington 1995).Search in Google Scholar

36 Recasens, D.: Coarticulatory patterns and degrees of coarticulatory resistance in catalan CV sequences. Lang. Speech 28: 97–114 (1985).10.1177/002383098502800201Search in Google Scholar

37 Shearme, J.N.; Holmes, J.N.: An experimental study of the classification of sounds in continuous speech according to their distribution in the formant 1- formant 2 plane; in Sovijarvi, Aalto, Proc. 4th Int. Congr. Phonet. Sci. (Mouton, The Hague 1962).Search in Google Scholar

38 Stevens, K.N.; House, A.S.: Perturbation of vowel articulations by consonantal context: an acoustical study. J. Speech Hear. Res. 6: 111–128 (1963).10.1044/jshr.0602.111Search in Google Scholar

39 Suga, N.; Yan, J.; Zhang, Y.: The processing of species-specific complex sounds by the ascending and descending auditory systems; in Boob, Brugge, Central auditory processing and neural modeling, pp. 55–70 (Plenum Press, New York 1998).10.1007/978-1-4615-5351-9_6Search in Google Scholar

40 Sussman, H.M.; Bessell, N.; Dalston, E.; Majors, T.: An investigation of stop place of articulation as a function of syllable position: a locus equation perspective. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 101: 2826–2838 (1997).10.1121/1.418567Search in Google Scholar

41 Sussman, H.M.; Fruchter, D.; Cable, A.: Locus equations derived from compensatory articulation. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 97: 3112–3124 (1995).10.1121/1.411873Search in Google Scholar

42 Sussman, H.M.; Fruchter, D.; Hilbert, J.; Sirosh, J.: Linear correlates in the speech signal: the orderly output constraint. Behav. Brain Sci. 21: 241–299 (1998).10.1017/S0140525X98001174Search in Google Scholar

43 Sussman, H.M.; Hoemeke, K.; Ahmed, F.: A cross-linguistic investigation of locus equations as a relationally invariant descriptor for place of articulation. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 94: 1256–1268 (1993).10.1121/1.408178Search in Google Scholar

44 Sussman, H.M.; McCaffrey, H.A.; Matthews, S.A.: An investigation of locus equations as a source of relational invariance for stop place categorization. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 90: 1309–1325 (1991).10.1121/1.401923Search in Google Scholar

45 Sussman, H.M.; Shore, J.: Locus equations as phonetic descriptors of consonantal place of articulation. Perception Psychophysics 58: 936–946 (1996).10.3758/BF03205495Search in Google Scholar

46 Tiffany, W.R.: Non-random sources of variation in vowel quality. J. Speech Hear. Res. 2: 305–317 (1959).10.1044/jshr.0204.305Search in Google Scholar

47 Van Son, R.J.J.D.; Pols, L.C.W.: Formant frequencies of Dutch vowels in a text, read at normal and fast rate. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 88: 1683–1693 (1990).10.1121/1.400243Search in Google Scholar

48 Van Son, R.J.J.H.; Pols, L.C.W.: Formant movements of Dutch vowels in a text, read at normal and fast rate. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 92: 121–127 (1992).10.1121/1.404277Search in Google Scholar

49 Wagner, H.; Takahashi, T.; Konishi, M.: Representation of interaural time difference in the central nucleus of the barn owl’s inferior colliculus. J. Neurosci. 7: 3105–3116 (1987).10.1523/JNEUROSCI.07-10-03105.1987Search in Google Scholar

50 Waibel, A.; Hanazawa, T.; Hinton, G.; Shikano, K.; Lang, K.: Phoneme recognition using time-delay neural networks. Proc. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Signal Processing 37: 328–339 (1989).10.1109/29.21701Search in Google Scholar

51 Watrous, R.L.: Speech recognition using connectionist networks; PhD diss. University of Pennsylvania (1988).Search in Google Scholar