Home Linguistics & Semiotics Chapter 6. The domain of surface texture
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Chapter 6. The domain of surface texture

  • Egor Kashkin and Olga Vinogradova
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
The Typology of Physical Qualities
This chapter is in the book The Typology of Physical Qualities

Abstract

The paper deals with the typology of surface texture expressions, such as slippery road, smooth wooden board, rough hands, coarse or rough fabric. We discuss both their literal uses and metaphors formed with them, such as slippery person, smooth speech, rugged captain. Our language sample includes 10 Uralic languages (Finnish, Estonian, Meadow Mari, Erzya, Moksha, Udmurt, Komi-Zyrjan, Hungarian, Khanty, Nenets), as well as 5 languages from other families (Russian, English, Spanish, Chinese, and Korean). The categorisation includes primarily a division into visually perceived surfaces and surfaces perceived through physical contact. We discuss in what ways the antonymic areas under observation are asymmetrical in their semantics and combinability. One more focus is on evaluating variation in the texture lexicon in genetically related languages in comparison with its variation across a broader sample of languages.

Abstract

The paper deals with the typology of surface texture expressions, such as slippery road, smooth wooden board, rough hands, coarse or rough fabric. We discuss both their literal uses and metaphors formed with them, such as slippery person, smooth speech, rugged captain. Our language sample includes 10 Uralic languages (Finnish, Estonian, Meadow Mari, Erzya, Moksha, Udmurt, Komi-Zyrjan, Hungarian, Khanty, Nenets), as well as 5 languages from other families (Russian, English, Spanish, Chinese, and Korean). The categorisation includes primarily a division into visually perceived surfaces and surfaces perceived through physical contact. We discuss in what ways the antonymic areas under observation are asymmetrical in their semantics and combinability. One more focus is on evaluating variation in the texture lexicon in genetically related languages in comparison with its variation across a broader sample of languages.

Downloaded on 11.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/tsl.133.06kas/html
Scroll to top button