Home Linguistics & Semiotics The X is ( is ) construction
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The X is ( is ) construction

An FDG account
  • Evelien Keizer
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
Casebook in Functional Discourse Grammar
This chapter is in the book Casebook in Functional Discourse Grammar

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to propose a Functional Discourse Grammar analysis of constructions of the form (the) {thing/point/fact etc.} is (is) (that) that reflects both the semi-fixed nature of these constructions and their specific discourse-pragmatic functions. First, it is argued that the sequence (the) {thing/X} is (is) (that) functions as a pragmatic-rhetorical marker in a presentative (non-specificational) construction. On the basis of authentic data, it is further argued that, in terms of form and function, there is no reason to assume that the thing is construction differs significantly from constructions with other head nouns, nor from constructions with double is. Finally, a Functional Discourse Grammar analysis of these constructions is proposed which fully exploits the model’s different levels of representation, as well as the presence of different kinds of primitives (lexemes, operators, frames, templates). In addition, a new feature will be introduced, that of the semi-fixed (morphosyntactic or phonological) template, to deal with the dual, semi-fixed nature of thing is/X is constructions.

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to propose a Functional Discourse Grammar analysis of constructions of the form (the) {thing/point/fact etc.} is (is) (that) that reflects both the semi-fixed nature of these constructions and their specific discourse-pragmatic functions. First, it is argued that the sequence (the) {thing/X} is (is) (that) functions as a pragmatic-rhetorical marker in a presentative (non-specificational) construction. On the basis of authentic data, it is further argued that, in terms of form and function, there is no reason to assume that the thing is construction differs significantly from constructions with other head nouns, nor from constructions with double is. Finally, a Functional Discourse Grammar analysis of these constructions is proposed which fully exploits the model’s different levels of representation, as well as the presence of different kinds of primitives (lexemes, operators, frames, templates). In addition, a new feature will be introduced, that of the semi-fixed (morphosyntactic or phonological) template, to deal with the dual, semi-fixed nature of thing is/X is constructions.

Downloaded on 23.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/slcs.137.09kei/html
Scroll to top button