Home Linguistics & Semiotics Chapter 2. The control and censorship of linguistic resources in an online Community of Practice
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Chapter 2. The control and censorship of linguistic resources in an online Community of Practice

  • Lisa Donlan
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
Corpus Approaches to Social Media
This chapter is in the book Corpus Approaches to Social Media

Abstract

This research utilises a corpus of one million posts retrieved from Popheads, an online Reddit-based Community of Practice (CoP), to analyse the power dynamics associated with language censorship in online CoPs. In 2018, the moderators of the community banned the community-salient word wig (‘surprised’ or ‘impressed’). Ostensibly, this was a top-down performance of linguistic control where the officially-appointed moderators put a stop to the diffusion of a seemingly beloved part of the community’s shared linguistic repertoire. However, through a mixed-methods analysis of the events surrounding the banning of wig, this research shows that moderators have not unilaterally enforced linguistic censorship. Instead, moderators have seemingly responded to a call, led primarily by members with markers of unofficial power, to restrict usage.

Abstract

This research utilises a corpus of one million posts retrieved from Popheads, an online Reddit-based Community of Practice (CoP), to analyse the power dynamics associated with language censorship in online CoPs. In 2018, the moderators of the community banned the community-salient word wig (‘surprised’ or ‘impressed’). Ostensibly, this was a top-down performance of linguistic control where the officially-appointed moderators put a stop to the diffusion of a seemingly beloved part of the community’s shared linguistic repertoire. However, through a mixed-methods analysis of the events surrounding the banning of wig, this research shows that moderators have not unilaterally enforced linguistic censorship. Instead, moderators have seemingly responded to a call, led primarily by members with markers of unofficial power, to restrict usage.

Downloaded on 13.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/scl.98.02don/html
Scroll to top button