Chapter 3. Pronouns and implicature
-
Wayne A. Davis
Abstract
In this chapter I investigate how differences among pronouns are related to differences in implicature. I characterize pronouns within my foundational theory of meaning, according to which words are conventional signs of mental states, principally thoughts and concepts, and meaning consists in their expressions. Indexicals express concepts that are distinctive in the way they link to other concepts or presentations. Indexical concepts are individuated by their sortal and determiner components. Indexicals have deictic, demonstrative and anaphoric uses. Pronouns are indexical words that can be used anaphorically with nouns as antecedents. After reviewing previous findings that the distinction between reflexive and non-reflexive pronouns cannot be explained in terms of implicature or pragmatic principles, I describe a wide range of implicatures that are generated by pronoun use. Some are semantic – what Grice called “conventional implicatures”. Sentences have these uncancelable implicatures because of the specific concepts expressed by the pronouns. Pronoun use also generates a wide range of conversational or pragmatic implicatures, through both non-semantic convention and specific contextual factors.
Abstract
In this chapter I investigate how differences among pronouns are related to differences in implicature. I characterize pronouns within my foundational theory of meaning, according to which words are conventional signs of mental states, principally thoughts and concepts, and meaning consists in their expressions. Indexicals express concepts that are distinctive in the way they link to other concepts or presentations. Indexical concepts are individuated by their sortal and determiner components. Indexicals have deictic, demonstrative and anaphoric uses. Pronouns are indexical words that can be used anaphorically with nouns as antecedents. After reviewing previous findings that the distinction between reflexive and non-reflexive pronouns cannot be explained in terms of implicature or pragmatic principles, I describe a wide range of implicatures that are generated by pronoun use. Some are semantic – what Grice called “conventional implicatures”. Sentences have these uncancelable implicatures because of the specific concepts expressed by the pronouns. Pronoun use also generates a wide range of conversational or pragmatic implicatures, through both non-semantic convention and specific contextual factors.
Chapters in this book
- Prelim pages i
- Table of contents v
- Chapter 1. Implicitness 1
-
Part I. Word and phrase
- Chapter 2. What’s a reading? 15
- Chapter 3. Pronouns and implicature 37
- Chapter 4. Implicitness in the lexis 67
- Chapter 5. Zero subject anaphors and extralinguistically motivated subject pro -drop in Hungarian language use 95
-
Part II. Sentence and utterance
- Chapter 6. Implicitness via overt untruthfulness 121
- Chapter 7. Lexical pragmatics and implicit communication 147
- Chapter 8. Indirect ritual offence 177
- Chapter 9. Implicitness in the use of situation-bound utterances 201
- Chapter 10. Thematic silence as a speech act 217
-
Part III. Text and discourse
- Chapter 11. The dynamics of discourse 235
- Chapter 12. Why don’t you tell it explicitly? 259
- Chapter 13. Implicature and the inferential substrate 281
- Index 305
- Index 305
Chapters in this book
- Prelim pages i
- Table of contents v
- Chapter 1. Implicitness 1
-
Part I. Word and phrase
- Chapter 2. What’s a reading? 15
- Chapter 3. Pronouns and implicature 37
- Chapter 4. Implicitness in the lexis 67
- Chapter 5. Zero subject anaphors and extralinguistically motivated subject pro -drop in Hungarian language use 95
-
Part II. Sentence and utterance
- Chapter 6. Implicitness via overt untruthfulness 121
- Chapter 7. Lexical pragmatics and implicit communication 147
- Chapter 8. Indirect ritual offence 177
- Chapter 9. Implicitness in the use of situation-bound utterances 201
- Chapter 10. Thematic silence as a speech act 217
-
Part III. Text and discourse
- Chapter 11. The dynamics of discourse 235
- Chapter 12. Why don’t you tell it explicitly? 259
- Chapter 13. Implicature and the inferential substrate 281
- Index 305
- Index 305