Home Linguistics & Semiotics Crowdchecking conceptual metaphors
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Crowdchecking conceptual metaphors

How principals and teachers frame the principal’s role in academics through metaphor
  • Hope Smith Davis , A. Bruce Watson and Michelle Bakerson
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company

Abstract

This chapter presents a procedure for metaphor checking using a crowdsource-like technique to validate conceptual metaphors and proposed entailments gathered electronically. In an initial online survey, K-12 principals and teachers completed metaphoric stems for the roles and duties of building-level administrators. A second survey, sent to the same group of principals, asked participants to rate their levels of agreement with the most frequently referenced conceptual metaphors from the initial surveys and potential entailments that were generated by the research team. Findings from the survey and implications for metaphor analysis studies in relation to crowdchecking methods are discussed.

Abstract

This chapter presents a procedure for metaphor checking using a crowdsource-like technique to validate conceptual metaphors and proposed entailments gathered electronically. In an initial online survey, K-12 principals and teachers completed metaphoric stems for the roles and duties of building-level administrators. A second survey, sent to the same group of principals, asked participants to rate their levels of agreement with the most frequently referenced conceptual metaphors from the initial surveys and potential entailments that were generated by the research team. Findings from the survey and implications for metaphor analysis studies in relation to crowdchecking methods are discussed.

Downloaded on 17.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/milcc.3.06dav/html
Scroll to top button