Home Linguistics & Semiotics Regarding the Third Factor
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Regarding the Third Factor

Arguments for a CLASH model
  • Juan Uriagereka
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
Minimalism and Beyond
This chapter is in the book Minimalism and Beyond

Abstract

“3rd factor” considerations are argued here to be a consequence of “dynamical frustration”. This process is seen as the irreconcilable tension between opposing tendencies that gives rise to a form of dynamical stability. Such tendencies are argued to be orthogonal computations: the left-to-right PF and a bottom-up computation involving conceptual relations, which organize into a model specifying Conditions Liberating a Simple Hiatus — or CLASH in acronym format. It is suggested that the CLASH model has a natural account of cyclic conditions within derivations, also predicting the existence of Fibonacci patterns within the linguistic system.

Abstract

“3rd factor” considerations are argued here to be a consequence of “dynamical frustration”. This process is seen as the irreconcilable tension between opposing tendencies that gives rise to a form of dynamical stability. Such tendencies are argued to be orthogonal computations: the left-to-right PF and a bottom-up computation involving conceptual relations, which organize into a model specifying Conditions Liberating a Simple Hiatus — or CLASH in acronym format. It is suggested that the CLASH model has a natural account of cyclic conditions within derivations, also predicting the existence of Fibonacci patterns within the linguistic system.

Downloaded on 23.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/lfab.11.15uri/html
Scroll to top button