Home General Interest Veridicality and sets of alternative worlds
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Veridicality and sets of alternative worlds

On embedded interrogatives and the complementizers that and if
  • Peter Öhl
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company

Abstract

This paper explores three related phenomena. First, not all embedded formal interrogatives (i.e. clauses introduced by if or whether) have the function of an indirect question. Second, the complementizers if and that may occur in identical syntactic contexts. Third, if-clauses may be licensed by certain (discourse) semantic factors, like negation, modality, and also verum focus, where otherwise that-clauses are preferred. The approach taken is based on epistemic logic, especially on the notion of relativized veridicality, the notion of possible worlds and the formal semantics of the complementizers that and if.

Abstract

This paper explores three related phenomena. First, not all embedded formal interrogatives (i.e. clauses introduced by if or whether) have the function of an indirect question. Second, the complementizers if and that may occur in identical syntactic contexts. Third, if-clauses may be licensed by certain (discourse) semantic factors, like negation, modality, and also verum focus, where otherwise that-clauses are preferred. The approach taken is based on epistemic logic, especially on the notion of relativized veridicality, the notion of possible worlds and the formal semantics of the complementizers that and if.

Downloaded on 14.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/la.249.04ohl/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button