Chapter 2. Complex NPs with third-order entity clauses
-
Kristin Davidse
Abstract
This article focuses on complex NP constructions of the form ‘determiner (+ adjective) + noun (+ complementiser) + clause’, which refer to third-order entities, defined by Lyons (1977: 443) as “such abstract entities as propositions, which are outside time and space”. Their functional structure has so far tended to be analysed in terms of one syntagmatic model, either as an appositive structure defined by the criterion that NP and clause have identical reference (e.g. Quirk et al. 1985) or as a complementation structure in which the noun is viewed as licensing the complement clause (e.g. Huddleston & Pullum 2002). I argue that, as unified descriptions, neither of these analyses can be maintained. I propose instead that these NPs divide into two distinct subtypes on the basis of different grammatical behaviour: one in which the third order entity clause is premodified by the noun and one in which it complements the head noun. Starting from this basic functional-structural division, I propose a typology that distinguishes the main semantic classes of nouns patterning with third-order entity clauses. The typology aims to capture the most important semantic distinctions between the subtypes of these complex NPs.
Abstract
This article focuses on complex NP constructions of the form ‘determiner (+ adjective) + noun (+ complementiser) + clause’, which refer to third-order entities, defined by Lyons (1977: 443) as “such abstract entities as propositions, which are outside time and space”. Their functional structure has so far tended to be analysed in terms of one syntagmatic model, either as an appositive structure defined by the criterion that NP and clause have identical reference (e.g. Quirk et al. 1985) or as a complementation structure in which the noun is viewed as licensing the complement clause (e.g. Huddleston & Pullum 2002). I argue that, as unified descriptions, neither of these analyses can be maintained. I propose instead that these NPs divide into two distinct subtypes on the basis of different grammatical behaviour: one in which the third order entity clause is premodified by the noun and one in which it complements the head noun. Starting from this basic functional-structural division, I propose a typology that distinguishes the main semantic classes of nouns patterning with third-order entity clauses. The typology aims to capture the most important semantic distinctions between the subtypes of these complex NPs.
Chapters in this book
- Prelim pages i
- Table of contents v
- Chapter 1. Introduction to the noun phrase in English 1
- Chapter 2. Complex NPs with third-order entity clauses 11
- Chapter 3. Adjective stacking in Early Modern English 47
- Chapter 4. The rich, the poor, the obvious 77
- Chapter 5. Variable article usage with institutional nouns 113
- Chapter 6. Anaphoric reference in Early Modern English 143
- Chapter 7. That -complementiser omission in N + be + that -clauses 187
- Index of terms 223
- Index of names 227
Chapters in this book
- Prelim pages i
- Table of contents v
- Chapter 1. Introduction to the noun phrase in English 1
- Chapter 2. Complex NPs with third-order entity clauses 11
- Chapter 3. Adjective stacking in Early Modern English 47
- Chapter 4. The rich, the poor, the obvious 77
- Chapter 5. Variable article usage with institutional nouns 113
- Chapter 6. Anaphoric reference in Early Modern English 143
- Chapter 7. That -complementiser omission in N + be + that -clauses 187
- Index of terms 223
- Index of names 227
