Home Linguistics & Semiotics Jespersen’s Cycle and the issue of prosodic ‘weakness’
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Jespersen’s Cycle and the issue of prosodic ‘weakness’

  • Patrizia Noel Aziz Hanna
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
Advances in Comparative Germanic Syntax
This chapter is in the book Advances in Comparative Germanic Syntax

Abstract

Jespersen’s Cycle (1917), according to which a negation particle is weakened and therefore later strengthened through an additional element, is a generally accepted explanation in language change. The German data, however, reveals that the weakening of the negation particle preceded the initiation of Jespersen’s Cycle by centuries. The further weakening caused the ineffi cacy of the old negation particle and thus initiated Jespersen’s Cycle. The reduction is demonstrated to result from segmental, prosodic, and syntactic factors. The progressive weakening of the negation particle (PIE *ne > OHG ni > MHG ne > NHG Ø) is due to the fact that its chances of attracting rhythmic stress became increasingly rare.

Abstract

Jespersen’s Cycle (1917), according to which a negation particle is weakened and therefore later strengthened through an additional element, is a generally accepted explanation in language change. The German data, however, reveals that the weakening of the negation particle preceded the initiation of Jespersen’s Cycle by centuries. The further weakening caused the ineffi cacy of the old negation particle and thus initiated Jespersen’s Cycle. The reduction is demonstrated to result from segmental, prosodic, and syntactic factors. The progressive weakening of the negation particle (PIE *ne > OHG ni > MHG ne > NHG Ø) is due to the fact that its chances of attracting rhythmic stress became increasingly rare.

Downloaded on 12.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/la.141.09jes/html
Scroll to top button