Home Philosophy Chapter 8. A historical controversy about politeness and public argument
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Chapter 8. A historical controversy about politeness and public argument

The dispute about fashion between Melchiorre Gioja and Antonio Rosmini
  • Francesca Saltamacchia and Andrea Rocci
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
Controversies and Interdisciplinarity
This chapter is in the book Controversies and Interdisciplinarity

Abstract

This article presents the Nineteenth-Century dispute arising from the criticism that the Italian philosopher Antonio Rosmini expressed against the arguments that the statesman Melchiorre Gioja supported in defense of fashion in his Apologia della moda ‘Apology of Fashion’ (1822) and against the utilitarian ideology that permeates the text. Gioja’s aggressive answer (in 1827) leads Rosmini to write a treatise on polite manners writers must have in public debate, thus offering an interesting ethical treatise. We aim to analyze the controversy adopting an interdisciplinary approach that investigates metapragmatic evaluative comments from the point of view of argumentation in order to reconstruct the argumentative justification behind each evaluation of (im)politeness and to show the principles defended by the disputants.

Abstract

This article presents the Nineteenth-Century dispute arising from the criticism that the Italian philosopher Antonio Rosmini expressed against the arguments that the statesman Melchiorre Gioja supported in defense of fashion in his Apologia della moda ‘Apology of Fashion’ (1822) and against the utilitarian ideology that permeates the text. Gioja’s aggressive answer (in 1827) leads Rosmini to write a treatise on polite manners writers must have in public debate, thus offering an interesting ethical treatise. We aim to analyze the controversy adopting an interdisciplinary approach that investigates metapragmatic evaluative comments from the point of view of argumentation in order to reconstruct the argumentative justification behind each evaluation of (im)politeness and to show the principles defended by the disputants.

Downloaded on 24.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/cvs.16.08sal/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button