Home Chapter 5. Re-examining initial geminates
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Chapter 5. Re-examining initial geminates

Typology, evolutionary phonology, and phonetics
  • Francesco Burroni and Sireemas Maspong
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
Historical Linguistics 2019
This chapter is in the book Historical Linguistics 2019

Abstract

We present a typology of the diachronic pathways leading to the emergence of Initial Geminates (IGs). We show that synchronic phonological properties of IGs, especially their moraic status, may be tied to the diachronic trajectory that leads to their emergence. This is expected if we follow an evolutionary approach to phonology, Evolutionary Phonology (EP). We further discuss potential alternatives and limitations to this scenario and introduce a series of testable predictions for future instrumental work on the topic. We complete our discussion with two cases studies of Pattani Malay and Salentino, the latter based on an original acoustic pilot study. We argue that these two languages show that lexical competition alone is not enough to predict the IGs’ resistance to merger contra previous accounts proposed in the framework of EP. We suggest that lexical competition needs to be better quantified and that other factors need to be taken into account if we are to understand the multifaceted synchronic realisation and evolution of IGs.

Abstract

We present a typology of the diachronic pathways leading to the emergence of Initial Geminates (IGs). We show that synchronic phonological properties of IGs, especially their moraic status, may be tied to the diachronic trajectory that leads to their emergence. This is expected if we follow an evolutionary approach to phonology, Evolutionary Phonology (EP). We further discuss potential alternatives and limitations to this scenario and introduce a series of testable predictions for future instrumental work on the topic. We complete our discussion with two cases studies of Pattani Malay and Salentino, the latter based on an original acoustic pilot study. We argue that these two languages show that lexical competition alone is not enough to predict the IGs’ resistance to merger contra previous accounts proposed in the framework of EP. We suggest that lexical competition needs to be better quantified and that other factors need to be taken into account if we are to understand the multifaceted synchronic realisation and evolution of IGs.

Downloaded on 7.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/cilt.367.05bur/pdf
Scroll to top button