Home Linguistics & Semiotics N!aqriaxe (ǂ’Amkoe) spatial terms from a genealogical and areal perspective
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

N!aqriaxe (ǂ’Amkoe) spatial terms from a genealogical and areal perspective

  • Linda Gerlach and Falko Berthold
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
Beyond ‘Khoisan’
This chapter is in the book Beyond ‘Khoisan’

Abstract

This paper discusses the spatial terminology of the N!aqriaxe variety of ǂ’Amkoe and compares it to the spatial terms of the two genealogically unrelated languages Taa and Gǀui, as well as to the related Ju dialect cluster. Taa, Gǀui, N!aqriaxe and some of the Ju varieties are spoken in or close to the Central Kalahari and are in contact with each other. All the languages investigated here have grammaticalised spatial terminology from different lexical sources, such as body parts or landmarks. We analyse the N!aqriaxe spatial terminology and investigate to what extent it is borrowed or inherited. Similarities across languages with respect to spatial terminology can sometimes be observed not only in the terms themselves, but also in spatial conceptualisations; since grammaticalisation pathways can also be borrowed, it is worthwhile to investigate these as well.

Abstract

This paper discusses the spatial terminology of the N!aqriaxe variety of ǂ’Amkoe and compares it to the spatial terms of the two genealogically unrelated languages Taa and Gǀui, as well as to the related Ju dialect cluster. Taa, Gǀui, N!aqriaxe and some of the Ju varieties are spoken in or close to the Central Kalahari and are in contact with each other. All the languages investigated here have grammaticalised spatial terminology from different lexical sources, such as body parts or landmarks. We analyse the N!aqriaxe spatial terminology and investigate to what extent it is borrowed or inherited. Similarities across languages with respect to spatial terminology can sometimes be observed not only in the terms themselves, but also in spatial conceptualisations; since grammaticalisation pathways can also be borrowed, it is worthwhile to investigate these as well.

Downloaded on 13.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/cilt.330.08ger/html
Scroll to top button