Home Linguistics & Semiotics Compound construction: Schemas or analogy?
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Compound construction: Schemas or analogy?

A construction morphology perspective
  • Geert Booij
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
Cross-Disciplinary Issues in Compounding
This chapter is in the book Cross-Disciplinary Issues in Compounding

Abstract

This chapter argues that there is no absolute boundary between analogy and abstract schemas in word formation. Patterns of compounding are captured by constructional schemas of various degrees of abstraction. The necessity of such subschemas is argued for on the basis of observations on semantic specialization, headedness variation, diachrony, and allomorphy selection. Analogy and abstract schemas are opposite endpoints on a scale of schematicity.

Abstract

This chapter argues that there is no absolute boundary between analogy and abstract schemas in word formation. Patterns of compounding are captured by constructional schemas of various degrees of abstraction. The necessity of such subschemas is argued for on the basis of observations on semantic specialization, headedness variation, diachrony, and allomorphy selection. Analogy and abstract schemas are opposite endpoints on a scale of schematicity.

Downloaded on 7.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/cilt.311.09boo/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button