Home Literary Studies A pragma-dialectical approach of legal argumentation
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A pragma-dialectical approach of legal argumentation

The role of pragmatic argumentation in the justification of judicial decisions
  • Eveline T. Feteris
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
Scrutinizing Argumentation in Practice
This chapter is in the book Scrutinizing Argumentation in Practice

Abstract

In this contribution I discuss the role of pragmatic argumentation referring to consequences, goals and values in complex structures of legal justification. From a pragma-dialectical perspective I describe the stereotypical patterns of legal justification in hard cases and specify the different ways in which these stereotypical patterns can be implemented in different contexts in which judges give a decision that they justify by referring to consequences, goals and values.

Abstract

In this contribution I discuss the role of pragmatic argumentation referring to consequences, goals and values in complex structures of legal justification. From a pragma-dialectical perspective I describe the stereotypical patterns of legal justification in hard cases and specify the different ways in which these stereotypical patterns can be implemented in different contexts in which judges give a decision that they justify by referring to consequences, goals and values.

Chapters in this book

  1. Prelim pages i
  2. Table of contents v
  3. Foreword vii
  4. A general perspective applied to scientific controversies
  5. Arguing in the grooves 3
  6. Argumentation in a political context
  7. Cultural differences in political debate 31
  8. The September 11, 1973 military coup in Chile and the military regime 1973–1990 49
  9. Argumentation in Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address 65
  10. Argumentation in a legal context
  11. The voices of justice. Argumentative polyphony and strategic manoeuvring in judgement motivations 79
  12. A pragma-dialectical approach of legal argumentation 99
  13. Transparency in legal argumentation 121
  14. Argumentation in education
  15. Knowledge-oriented argumentation in children 135
  16. Argumentative strategies in adolescents’ school writing 151
  17. The integration of pragma-dialectics and collaborative learning research 175
  18. A critique of the ubiquity of the Toulmin model in argumentative writing instruction in the U.S.A. 201
  19. Argumentation in an interpersonal context
  20. The psychiatrization of the opponent in polemical context 217
  21. The effect of interpersonal familiarity on argument in online discussions 233
  22. “I did not do it, because I would not do it” 251
  23. Argumentation from analogy in migrants’ decisions 265
  24. Can argumentation skills become a therapeutic resource? 281
  25. Strategic maneuvering
  26. The strategic function of argumentative moves in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) reports 297
  27. The disguised ad baculum fallacy empirically investigated 313
  28. A strategic maneuvering analysis of Japan’s first internet election in 2013 327
  29. Index 343
Downloaded on 20.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/aic.9.06fet/html
Scroll to top button