Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
Comment on Robert Barro: The Little Learned of Multipliers from 1943-44
-
Sherman J Maisel
Published/Copyright:
March 6, 2009
The multiplier in 1943-44 may have been low by design, according to Sherman Maisel, Professor Emeritus at UC Berkeley and former Member of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve.
Published Online: 2009-3-6
©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Letter
- Letter: Robert J. Barro's "Voodoo Multipliers" Misunderstands Keynes
- Letter: Notes on Keynes and a Reply to Greg Hill
- Comment on John Quigley: Wrong Incentives in the Mortgage Industry and a Solution
- Comment on Robert Barro: The Little Learned of Multipliers from 1943-44
- Comment on Luigi Zingales: Why not Consider Maximum Reserve Ratios?
- Comment on Brad Delong: Can We Generate Controlled Reflation in a Liquidity Trap?
- Column
- Bankruptcy is Best to Save GM
- Show Me The Money
- Adaptive Partial Drug Approval: A Health Policy Proposal
Articles in the same Issue
- Letter
- Letter: Robert J. Barro's "Voodoo Multipliers" Misunderstands Keynes
- Letter: Notes on Keynes and a Reply to Greg Hill
- Comment on John Quigley: Wrong Incentives in the Mortgage Industry and a Solution
- Comment on Robert Barro: The Little Learned of Multipliers from 1943-44
- Comment on Luigi Zingales: Why not Consider Maximum Reserve Ratios?
- Comment on Brad Delong: Can We Generate Controlled Reflation in a Liquidity Trap?
- Column
- Bankruptcy is Best to Save GM
- Show Me The Money
- Adaptive Partial Drug Approval: A Health Policy Proposal
