Home Where does evidentiality reside? Notes on (alleged) limiting cases: seem and be like
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Where does evidentiality reside? Notes on (alleged) limiting cases: seem and be like

  • Günther Lampert and Martina Lampert
Published/Copyright: November 30, 2010

Abstract

Standard definitions of evidentiality yield unwanted effects for alleged English evidentials: Some (like seem) do not specify an information source at all, but only schematically refer to it, others (like reporting verbs) are, in light of the envisaged cognitive-functional definition, best examples, yet are supposed to be (partially) excluded because of their non-lexicalized meanings. The present meta-study of conceptualizations of evidentiality, a far from trivial issue which must be settled before any database can be compiled, scrutinizes relevant parameters and applies them to two test cases, seem and ‘mediated’ evidentials, suggesting to conceptualize evidentiality as a multi-dimensional contextu­al category.

Published Online: 2010-11-30
Published in Print: 2010-11

© by Akademie Verlag, Mainz, Germany

Downloaded on 1.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1524/stuf.2010.0024/html
Scroll to top button