Home Right dislocation and raising-to-object in Zulu
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Right dislocation and raising-to-object in Zulu

  • Claire Halpert EMAIL logo and Jochen Zeller
Published/Copyright: September 9, 2015
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In this paper, we analyze an unusual type of right dislocation in Zulu. We demonstrate that the construction in question combines A-movement of a DP out of an embedded finite CP into a matrix argument position (raising-to-object; RtO) with right dislocation of both the raised DP and the clause out of which it raises. The existence of such a construction is noteworthy for several reasons. First, the conclusion that Zulu allows A-movement out of a finite CP is at odds with standard Minimalist analyses of raising and also with the alternative analysis of RtO from finite clauses proposed in Bruening (2001, 2002). Second, on our proposed analysis, RtO can take place out of a CP-complement, which is subsequently dislocated and adjoined to a maximal projection, supporting Büring and Hartmann (1997), who argue that movement from an extraposed CP happens before CP-dislocation. Our findings thus provide a strong argument for a movement analysis of CP-extraposition. We finally conclude that these constructions present a number of complications for recent analyses of right dislocation as leftward movement plus clausal ellipsis (Ott and de Vries 2014, and Ott and de Vries (in press)), due to the interaction between A-movement and dislocation and the word order resulting from CP-extraposition.

Acknowledgment

We are grateful to Mthuli Percival Buthelezi and Monwabisi Mhlophe for sharing their Zulu grammaticality judgments with us. Thanks go as well to Dennis Ott, the audience at Bantu 5, and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful feedback and suggestions.

References

Adams, Nikki. 2010. The Zulu ditransitive verb phrase. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Baker, Mark. 2003. Agreement, dislocation, and partial configurationality. In Andrew Carnie, Heidi Harley & Mary Ann Willie (eds.), Formal approaches to function in grammar: in honor of Eloise Jelinek, 107–132. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.62.09bakSearch in Google Scholar

Baker, Mark. 2008. The Syntax of agreement and concord. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511619830Search in Google Scholar

Baker, Mark & Chris Collins. 2006. Linkers and the internal structure of vP. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 24. 307–354.10.1007/s11049-005-2235-1Search in Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan & Sam A. Mchombo. 1987. Topic, pronoun, and agreement in Chicheŵa. Language 63(4). 741–782.10.2307/415717Search in Google Scholar

Bruening, Benjamin. 2001. Syntax at the edge: Cross-clausal phenomena and the syntax of Passamaquoddy. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Bruening, Benjamin. 2002. Raising to object and proper movement. http://udel.edu/~bruening/Downloads/RTO1.pdf (accessed 13 November, 2014).Search in Google Scholar

Buell, Leston. 2005. Issues in Zulu verbal morphosyntax. Los Angeles, CA: University of California dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Buell, Leston. 2006. The Zulu conjoint/disjoint verb alternation: Focus or constituency? In Laura Downing, Lutz Marten & Sabine Zerbian (eds.), Papers in Bantu Grammar and Description. (ZAS Papers in Linguistics 43), 9–30. Berlin: ZAS.10.21248/zaspil.43.2006.283Search in Google Scholar

Buell, Leston. 2008. VP-internal DPs and right-dislocation in Zulu. In Marjo van Koppen & Bert Botma (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 25, 37–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/avt.25.07bueSearch in Google Scholar

Büring, Daniel & Katharina Hartmann. 1997. Doing the right thing. The Linguistic Review 14. 1–42.10.1515/tlir.1997.14.1.1Search in Google Scholar

Carstens, Vicki. 2005. Agree and EPP in Bantu. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 23. 219–279.10.1007/s11049-004-0996-6Search in Google Scholar

Carstens, Vicki. 2011. Hyperactivity and hyperagreement in Bantu. Lingua 121. 721–741.10.1016/j.lingua.2010.11.001Search in Google Scholar

Carstens, Vicki & Michael Diercks. 2013. Parameterizing case and activity: Hyperraising in Bantu. In Seda Kan, Claire Moore-Cantwell & Robert Staubs (eds.), Proceedings of the fortieth annual meeting of the North East Linguistics Society, 99–118. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Graduate Linguistic Student Association.Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, Lisa & Laura Downing. 2009. Where’s the topic in Zulu? The Linguistic Review 26. 207–238.10.1515/tlir.2009.008Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Robert Freidin, Carlos Otero & Maria-Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 133–166. Cambridge: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262062787.003.0007Search in Google Scholar

Collins, Chris. 2005. The agreement parameter. In Anne Breitbarth & Henk van Reimsdijk (eds.), Triggers, 115–136. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Davies, William D. 2005. Madurese prolepsis and its implications for a typology of raising. Language 81(3). 645–665.10.1353/lan.2005.0121Search in Google Scholar

Diercks, Michael. 2012. Parameterizing case. Evidence from Bantu. Syntax 15(3). 253–286.10.1111/j.1467-9612.2011.00165.xSearch in Google Scholar

Epstein, Samuel D., Erich M. Groat, Ruriko Kawashima & Hisatsugu Kitahara. 1998. A derivational approach to syntactic relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Epstein, Samuel D. & T. Daniel Seely. 2006. Derivations in minimalist syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511550607Search in Google Scholar

Halpert, Claire. 2012. Argument licensing and agreement in Zulu. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Hawkins, John A. 1994. A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511554285Search in Google Scholar

Huang, James. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Jurka, Johannes. 2010. The importance of being a complement: CED-effects revisited. College Park, MD: University of Maryland dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Khumalo, James S. M. 1987. An autosegmental account of Zulu phonology. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Krapova, Iliyana. 1998. Subjunctive complements, null subjects and case checking in Bulgarian. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 8(2). 73–93.10.1075/cilt.182.14kraSearch in Google Scholar

Landau, Idan. 2004. The Scale of finiteness and the calculus of control. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 22. 811–877.10.1007/s11049-004-4265-5Search in Google Scholar

Lasnik, Howard & Mamoru Saito. 1991. On the subject of infinitives. In Lise M. Dobrin, Lynn Nichols & Rosa M. Rodriguez (eds.), Papers from the 27th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 324–343. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. (Reprinted in: Lasnik, Howard. 1999. Minimalist Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell, chapter 2).Search in Google Scholar

Nunes, Jairo & Juan Uriagereka. 2000. Cyclicity and extraction domains. Syntax 3. 20–43.10.1111/1467-9612.00023Search in Google Scholar

Ott, Dennis. 2014. An ellipsis approach to contrastive left-dislocation. Linguistic Inquiry 45(2). 269–303.10.1162/LING_a_00155Search in Google Scholar

Ott, Dennis & Mark de Vries. 2014. A biclausal analysis of right-dislocation.In Hsin-Lun Huang et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the forty third annual meeting of the North East linguistics society, 41–54. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Graduate Linguistic Student Association.Search in Google Scholar

Ott, Dennis & Mark de Vries. in press. Right-dislocation as deletion. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory.Search in Google Scholar

Perez (Harford), Carolyn H. 1985. Aspects of complementation in three Bantu languages. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Postal, Paul. 1974. On raising: One rule of English grammar and its theoretical implications. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rosenbaum, Peter. 1967. The grammar of English predicate complement constructions. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Stepanov, Arthur. 2007. The end of CED? Minimalism and extraction domains. Syntax 10. 80–126.10.1111/j.1467-9612.2007.00094.xSearch in Google Scholar

Tanaka, Hidekazu. 1999. Raised objects and superiority. Linguistic Inquiry 30(2). 317–325.10.1162/002438999554093Search in Google Scholar

Terzi, Arhonto. 1997. PRO and null case in finite clauses. The Linguistic Review 14(4). 335–360.10.1515/tlir.1997.14.4.335Search in Google Scholar

Van der Spuy, Andrew. 1993. Dislocated noun phrases in Nguni. Lingua 90. 335–355.10.1016/0024-3841(93)90031-QSearch in Google Scholar

Van der Wal, Jenneke. 2009. Word order and information structure in Makhuwa-Enahara. Utrecht: LOT.Search in Google Scholar

Wasow, Thomas. 2002. Postverbal behavior. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information (CSLI) Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Zeller, Jochen. 2006. Raising out of finite CP in Nguni: The case of fanele. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 24(3). 255–275.10.2989/16073610609486420Search in Google Scholar

Zeller, Jochen. 2008. The subject marker in Bantu as an antifocus marker. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics 38. 221–254.10.5774/38-0-31Search in Google Scholar

Zeller, Jochen. 2012. Object marking in isiZulu. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 30(2). 219–235.10.2989/16073614.2012.737600Search in Google Scholar

Zeller, Jochen. 2015. Argument prominence and agreement: explaining an unexpected object asymmetry in Zulu. Lingua 156. 17–39.10.1016/j.lingua.2014.11.009Search in Google Scholar

Zerbian, Sabine. 2006. Expression of information structure in Northern Sotho. Berlin: Humboldt University dissertation.10.21248/zaspil.45.2006.331Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2015-9-9
Published in Print: 2015-9-1

©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton

Downloaded on 1.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tlr-2014-0029/html
Scroll to top button