References

Ackema, Peter & Ad Neeleman. 2004. Beyond morphology: Interface conditions on word formation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199267286.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Akkuş, Faruk..2013. Light verb constructions in Turkish: A case for DP predication and blocking. Paper presented at Workshop on Formal Altaic Linguistics-9. Cornell University.Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, Stephen. 1994. A-morphous morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Aygen, Gülşat..2002. Finiteness, case, and clausal achitecture. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.Search in Google Scholar

Arslan-Kechriotis, Z. Ceyda. 2009. Determiner phrase and case in Turkish: A minimalist account. Saarbrücken: Verlag Dr. Müller.Search in Google Scholar

Bağrıaçık, Metin.& Angela Ralli. 2014. NN-si concatenations in Turkish: Construct state nominals and phrasal compounds. Proceedings of WAFL-8. 13–24. https://www.academia.edu/3168282/Turkish_compounds#1Search in Google Scholar

Bağrıaçık, Metin.& Angela Ralli. 2015 this volume. Phrasal vs. morphological compounds: Insights from Modern Greek and Turkish.10.1515/stuf-2015-0016Search in Google Scholar

Bauer, Laurie. 1978. The grammar of nominal compounding with special reference to Danish, English, and French. Odense: Odense University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bauer, Laurie. 2003. Introducing linguistic morphology. (Second edition). Washington: Georgetown University Press.10.1515/9781474464284Search in Google Scholar

Bisetto, Antonietta & Sergio Scalise. 2005. The classification of compounds. Lingue e Linguaggio 4(2). 319–332.Search in Google Scholar

Booij, Geert. 2009. Compounding and construction morphology. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavel Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 201–216. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Booij, Geert. 2010. Compound constructions: Schema or analogy. A construction morphology perspective. In Sergio Scalise & Irene Vogel (eds.), Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding, 93–107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.311.09booSearch in Google Scholar

Borer, Hagit. 1999. Deconstructing the construct. In Kyle Johnson & Ian Roberts (eds.), Beyond principles and parameters, 43–89. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-4822-1_3Search in Google Scholar

Botha, Rudolf P. 1984. Morphological mechanisms: Lexicalist analysis of synthetic compounding. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Brendel, Elke, Jörg Meibauer & Markus Steinbach. 2011. Exploring the meaning of quotation. In Elke Brendel, Jörg, Meibauer & Markus Steinbach (eds.), Understanding quotation, 1–34. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110240085.1Search in Google Scholar

Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2014. Quotatives: New trends and sociolinguistic implications. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.10.1002/9781118584415Search in Google Scholar

Charette, Monik, Aslı Göksel & Serkan Şener 2006. Initial stress in morphologically complex words in Turkish: The interface of prosody and phrase structure. Ms., SOAS, University of London.Search in Google Scholar

Culicover, Peter & Ray Jackendoff. 2005. Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199271092.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Dede, Müşerref..1978. A syntactic and semantic analysis of Turkish nominal compounds. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Michigan.Search in Google Scholar

Demircan, Ömer. 2001. Türkçe’nin Ezgisi [The intonation of Turkish]. Istanbul: Yıldız Technical University Press.Search in Google Scholar

DiSciullo, Anna-Marie..2005. Asymmetry in morphology. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/1465.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

DiSciullo, Anna-Marie.& Edwin, Williams. 1987. On the definition of word. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dixon, Robert M. W. 2006. Complement clauses and complementation strategies in typological perspective. In Robert M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Complementation: A cross-linguistic zypology, 1–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199297870.003.0001Search in Google Scholar

Dubinsky, Stanley William, & Robert Hamilton. 1998. Epithets as antilogophoric pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 29(4). 685–693.10.1162/002438998553923Search in Google Scholar

Erkman, Fatma, Ömer Delikgöz & Özlem Görür. 2006. [Diye] sözcüğü ve anlatıma kazandırdıkları [The word [diye] and its contribution to expressions]. In Yusuf Çotuksöken & N. Yalçın (eds.), XX. Ulusal Dilbilim Kurultayı Bildirileri, 161–165. T.C. Maltepe Üniversitesi Yayınları.Search in Google Scholar

Göksel, Aslı. 1988. Bracketing paradoxes in Turkish nominal compounds. In Sabri Koç (ed.), Studies on Turkish linguistics, 287–298. Ankara: ODTÜ Yayınları.Search in Google Scholar

Göksel, Aslı. 2008. Linkers on the edge: Turkish compound marking. CompNet Congress on Compounding, University of Bologna, 6–7 Haziran 2008.Search in Google Scholar

Göksel, Aslı. 2009. Compounding in Turkish. Lingua e Linguaggio 8(2). 213–236.Search in Google Scholar

Göksel, Aslı, & Celia Kerslake. 2005. Turkish, a comprehensive crammar. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203340769Search in Google Scholar

Göksel, Aslı, & Belma Haznedar. 2007. Remarks on compounding in Turkish. Ms. http://componet.sslmit.unibo.it/download/remarks/TR.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Göksel, Aslı, Meltem, Kelepir & Aslı, Üntak-Tarhan. 2009. Decomposition of question intonation: The structure of response seeking utterances. In Janet Grijzenhout & Aslı, Üntak-Tarhan Barış, Kabak (eds.), Phonological domains: Universals and deviations (Interface explorations), 249–286. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110219234.2.249Search in Google Scholar

Güneş, Güliz. 2009. On the formation of [V+V] compounds in Turkish. Paper presented at the 2nd Mediterranean Graduate Student Meeting in Linguistics. Mersin University.Search in Google Scholar

Gürer, Aslı. 2010. Subject positions, case checking and EPP in complex noun phrase constructions in Turkish. MA Dissertation. Boğaziçi University.Search in Google Scholar

Harley, Heidi. 2009. Compounding in distributed morphology. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavel Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 128–144. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hayashi, Tooru. 1996. The dual status of possessive compounds in Modern Turkish. In Berta Árpád, Bernt Brendemoen & Claus Schönig (eds.), Symbolae Turcologicae. Studies in honour of Lars Johanson on his sixtieth birthday 8 March 1996, 119–129. Swedish Research Institute in Istanbul.Search in Google Scholar

Hiraiwa, Ken. 2005. Dimensions of symmetries in syntax: Agreement and clausal architecture. Doctoral Dissertation. MIT.Search in Google Scholar

Inkelas, Sharon & Cemil Orhan Orgun. 2003. Turkish stress: A review. Phonology 20). 139–161.10.1017/S0952675703004482Search in Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 2009. Compounding in the parallel architecture and conceptual semantics. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavel Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 105–129. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kabak, Barış, & Anthi Revithiadou. 2006. The phonology of clitic groups: Prosodic recursivity revisited. Paper presented at the 13th International Conference on Turkish Linguistics. Uppsala University.Search in Google Scholar

Kabak, Barış, & Anthi Revithiadou. 2009. An interface approach to prosodic word recursion. In Janet Grijzenhout & Barış Kabak (eds.), Phonological domains: Universals and deviations (Interface explorations), 105–133. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110219234.2.105Search in Google Scholar

Kamali, Beste & Didem İkizoğlu. undated. Against compound stress in Turkish.Search in Google Scholar

Kharytonava, Olga. 2010. The morphology of affix sharing in Turkish. The Coyote Papers 18. University of Arizona Linguistics Department.Search in Google Scholar

Keskİn, Cem. 2009. Subject agreement–dependency of accusative case in Turkish or jump-starting grammatical machinery. Utrecht: LOT publications.Search in Google Scholar

Kornfilt, Jaklin. 1986. The stuttering prohibition and morpheme deletion in Turkish. In Eser Erguvanlı-Taylan & Ayhan Aksu-Koç (eds.), Proceedings of the Turkish linguistics conference, 295–307. Istanbul: Boğaziçi University Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Kornfilt, Jaklin. 1997. Turkish. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Kornfilt, Jaklin & John Whitman. 2011. Afterword: Nominalizations in syntactic theory. Lingua 121. 1297–1313.10.1016/j.lingua.2011.01.008Search in Google Scholar

Kornfilt, Jaklin & John Whitman. 2012. Genitive subjects and TP nominalizations. In Gianina Iordachioaia (ed.), Proceedings of JeNom4, Working Papers of the SFB 732.Search in Google Scholar

Kunduracı, Aysun. 2013. Turkish noun-noun compounds: A process-based paradigmatic account. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Calgary.Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, Geoffrey. 2001. Turkish grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lieber, Rochelle. 1992. Deconstructing morphology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lieber, Rochelle. 2005. English word-formation processes: Observations, issues and thoughts on future research.In Rochelle Lieber & Pavel Štekauer (eds.), Handbook of word-formation, 375–427. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/1-4020-3596-9_16Search in Google Scholar

Lieber, Rochelle. 2009. IE, Germanic: English. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavel Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 357–369. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Meibauer, Jörg. 2003. Phrasenkomposita zwischen Wortsyntax und Lexikon. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 22(2). 153–188.10.1515/zfsw.2003.22.2.153Search in Google Scholar

Meibauer, Jörg. 2007. How marginal are phrasal compounds? Generalized insertion, expressivity, and I/Q-interaction. Morphology 17. 233–259.10.1007/s11525-008-9118-1Search in Google Scholar

Montermini, Fabio. 2010. Units in compounding. In Sergio Scalise & Irene Vogel (eds.), Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding, 77–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.311.08monSearch in Google Scholar

Mukai, Makiko. 2008. Recursive compounds. Word Structure 1(2). 178–198.10.3366/E1750124508000214Search in Google Scholar

Neale, Stephen. 1990. Descriptions. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Öztürk, Balkız. 2005. Case, referentiality and phrase structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.77Search in Google Scholar

Özsoy, A Sumru. 2004. Dışişleri eski bakanı ve Türkçe’nin yeni yapısı. In Zehra Toska (ed.), Kaf Dağı’nın Ötesine Varmak, Günay Kut Armağanı, Vol. 3, Journal of Turkish Studies, Türklük Bilgisi Araştırmaları 28/1, Harvard University.Search in Google Scholar

Pafel, Jürgen. 2011. Two dogmas on quotation. In Elke Brendel, Jörg Meibauer & Markus Steinbach (eds.), Understanding quotation, 249–276. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110240085.249Search in Google Scholar

Ralli, Angela. 2008. Compound markers and parametric variation. Language Typology and Universals 61(1). 19–38.10.1524/stuf.2008.0004Search in Google Scholar

Sadock, Jerrold M. 1991. Autolexical syntax. A theory of parallel grammatical representations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Scalise, Sergio & Emiliano Guevara. 2005. The lexicalist approach to word-formation and the notion of the lexicon. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavel Štekauer (eds.), Handbook of word-formation, 147–187. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/1-4020-3596-9_7Search in Google Scholar

Scalise, Sergio & Irene Vogel. 2010. Why compounding? In Sergio Scalise & Irene Vogel (eds.), Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding, 1–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.311.02scaSearch in Google Scholar

Schaaik, Gerjan van. 1998. On the usage of gibi. In Lars Johanson, Éva Ágnes Csató, Vanessa Locke, Astrid Menz & Dorathea Winterling (eds.), The Mainz meeting, 422–457. Wiesbaden: Harrossowitz.Search in Google Scholar

Schaaik, Gerjan van. 2002. The noun in Turkish: Its argument structure and the compounding straitjacket. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Search in Google Scholar

Schroeder, Christoph. 1999. The Turkish nominal phrase in spoken discourse. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Search in Google Scholar

Tat, Deniz. 2013. Word syntax of nominal compounds: Internal and aphasiological evidence from Turkish. PhD dissertation, University of Arizona.Search in Google Scholar

Trips, Carola. 2013. The relevance of phrasal compounds for the architecture of grammar. http://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/001815Search in Google Scholar

Uygun, Dilek. 2009. A split model for category specification: Lexical categories in Turkish. PhD dissertation, Boğaziçi University, Turkey.Search in Google Scholar

Wälchli, Bernhard. 2005. Co-compounds and natural coordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199276219.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Wiese, Richard. 1996. Phrasal compounds and the theory of word syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 27, 183–193.Search in Google Scholar

Yıldız, Esra. 2014. Reduplication as a compounding process: The case of [VV] converbs in Turkish. MA thesis. Boğaziçi University.Search in Google Scholar

Yükseker, Hitay. 1998. Possessive constructions in Turkish. In Lars Johanson, Éva Ágnes Csató, Vanessa Locke, Astrid Menz & Dorathea Winterling (eds.), The Mainz meeting, 458–477. Wiesbaden: Harrossowitz.Search in Google Scholar

Zileli, Gün. 2002. Havariler (Disciples). Istanbul: Iletişim Yayınları.Search in Google Scholar