On “R” in phrasal compounds – a contextualist approach

References

Ackema, Peter & Ad Neeleman. 2004. Beyond morphology: Interface conditions on word-formation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199267286.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Allan, Keith & Kasia M. Jaszczolt (eds.) 2012. The Cambridge handbook of pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139022453Search in Google Scholar

Bauer, Laurie. 1979. On the need for pragmatics in the study of nominal compounding. Journal of Pragmatics 3. 45–50.10.1016/0378-2166(79)90003-1Search in Google Scholar

Booij, Geert. 2009. Compounding and construction morphology. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 201–216. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Booij, Geert. 2010a. Construction morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Booij, Geert. 2010b. Construction morphology. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(1). 1–13.Search in Google Scholar

Booij, Geert. forthcoming. Morphology in construction grammar. In Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds.), Word formation. An international handbook of the languages of Europe. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Borg, Emma. 2012. Pursuing semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Brendel, Elke, Jörg Meibauer & Markus Steinbach. 2011. Exploring the meaning of quotation. In Elke Brendel, Jörg Meibauer & Markus Steinbach (eds.), Understanding quotation, 1–33. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110240085Search in Google Scholar

Cappelen, Herman & Ernie Lepore. 2005. Insensitive semantics: A defense of semantic minimalism and speech act pluralism. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470755792Search in Google Scholar

Carston, Robyn. 2002. Thoughts and utterances. The pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470754603Search in Google Scholar

Downing, Pamela. 1977. On the creation and use of English compound nouns. Language 53. 810–842.10.2307/412913Search in Google Scholar

Dressler, Wolfgang U. & Lavinia Merlini Barbaresi. 1994. Morphopragmatics: Diminutives and intensifiers in Italian, German, and other languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110877052Search in Google Scholar

Finkbeiner, Rita & Jörg Meibauer. forthcoming. Indexicalism. In Konstanze Jungbluth & Federica da Milano (eds.), Manual of deixis in Romance languages. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Fleischer, Wolfgang & Irmhild Barz. 42012. Wortbildung der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Grice, Paul. 1989. Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Günther, Hartmut. 1981. N+N: Untersuchungen zur Produktivität eines deutschen Wortbildungstyps. In Leonhard Lipka & Hartmut Günther (eds.), Wortbildung, 258–280. Darmstadt: WBG.Search in Google Scholar

Gutzmann, Daniel & Erik Stei. 2011. Quotation marks and kinds of meaning. Arguments in favor of a pragmatic account. In Elke Brendel, Jörg Meibauer & Markus Steinbach (eds.), Understanding quotation, 161–193. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110240085.161Search in Google Scholar

Huang, Yan. 2010. Anaphora, pragmatics of. In Louise Cummings (ed.), The pragmatics encyclopedia, 9–13. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, Yan. 2012a. The Oxford dictionary of pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199697960.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Huang, Yan. 2012b. Introduction: What is pragmatics? In Yan Huang (ed.), The Oxford dictionary of pragmatics, 1–19. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199697960.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Jacobs, Joachim. 2008. Wozu Konstruktionen? Linguistische Berichte 213. 3–44.10.46771/2366077500213_1Search in Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 1997. The architecture of the language faculty. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 2009. Compounding in the parallel architecture and conceptual semantics. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 105–128. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 2010. The ecology of English noun-noun compounds. In Ray Jackendoff (ed.), Meaning and the lexicon, 413–451. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lawrenz, Birgit (1996): Der Zwischen-den-Mahlzeiten-Imbiß und der Herren-der-Welt-Größenwahn: Aspekte der Struktur und Bildungsweisen von Phrasenkomposita im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 24. 1–15.10.1515/zfgl.1996.24.1.1Search in Google Scholar

Lawrenz, Birgit. 2006. Moderne deutsche Wortbildung. Phrasale Wortbildung im Deutschen: Linguistische Untersuchung und sprachdidaktische Behandlung.Hamburg: Dr. Kovač.Search in Google Scholar

Lees, R. B. 1960. The grammar of English nominalization. The Hague: Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. 2000. Presumptive meanings. The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lieber, Rochelle. 1988. Phrasal compounds and the morphology-syntax-interface. Chicago Linguistic Society 24, Part II: Parasession on agreement in grammatical theory, 202–222.Search in Google Scholar

Lieber, Rochelle. 2004. Morphology and lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lieber, Rochelle. 2009. A lexical semantic approach to compounding. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 78–104. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lieber, Rochelle & Sergio Scalise. 2007. The lexical integrity hypothesis in a new theoretical universe. In Geert Booij et al. (eds.), On-line proceedings of the fifth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (MMM 5), Fréjus 15–18 September 2005, University of Bologna, 2007, 1–24. [URL http://mmm.lingue.unibo.it/]Search in Google Scholar

Lieber, Rochelle & Pavol Štekauer (eds.) 2009. The Oxford handbook of compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Maienborn, Claudia, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds.) 2011. Semantics. An international handbook of natural language meaning. Vls. 1–3. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Meibauer, Jörg. 2003. Phrasenkomposita zwischen Wortsyntax und Lexikon. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 22(2). 153–188.10.1515/zfsw.2003.22.2.153Search in Google Scholar

Meibauer, Jörg. 2007. How marginal are phrasal compounds? Generalized insertion, expressivity, and I/Q-nteraction. Morphology 17. 233–259.10.1007/s11525-008-9118-1Search in Google Scholar

Meibauer, Jörg. 2012. What is a context? Theoretical and empirical evidence. In Rita Finkbeiner, Jörg Meibauer & Petra B. Schumacher (eds.), What is a context? Linguistic approaches and challenges, 9–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.196.04meiSearch in Google Scholar

Meibauer, Jörg. 2013. Expressive compounds in German. Word Structure 6(1). 21–42.10.3366/word.2013.0034Search in Google Scholar

Meibauer, Jörg. 2014. Word-formation and contextualism. International Review of Pragmatics 6(1). 103–126.10.1163/18773109-00601006Search in Google Scholar

Merlini Barbaresi, Lavinia & Wolfgang U. Dressler. 2011. Morphopragmatics. In Louise Cummings (ed.), The pragmatics encyclopedia, 278–280. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Motsch, Wolfgang. 2004. Deutsche Wortbildung in Grundzügen. 2. Aufl. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110906059Search in Google Scholar

Olsen, Susan. 2012. The semantics of compounds. In Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics. An international handbook of natural language meaning. Vol. 2., 2120–2151. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Pafel, Jürgen. 2011. Two dogmas on quotation. In Elke Brendel, Jörg Meibauer & Markus Steinbach (eds.), Understanding quotation, 249–276. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110240085.249Search in Google Scholar

Pafel, Jürgen. this issue. Are phrasal compounds a challenge to lexical integrity?Search in Google Scholar

Recanati, François. 2004. Literal meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615382Search in Google Scholar

Recanati, François. 2010. Truth-conditional pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226993.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Schlücker, Barbara. 2013. Non-classifying compounds in German. Folia Linguistica 47(2). 449–480.10.1515/flin.2013.017Search in Google Scholar

Spencer, Andrew. 2011. What’s in a compound? Journal of Linguistics 47(2). 481–507.10.1017/S0022226710000411Search in Google Scholar

Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Trips, Carola. 2012. Empirical and theoretical aspects of phrasal compounds: against the “syntax explains it all” attitude. In Angela Ralli et al. (eds.), On-line proceedings of the Mediterranean Morphology Meeting 8, Cagliari, 2011, Morphology and the architecture of grammar, 322–346.Search in Google Scholar

Trips, Carola. 2013. The relevance of phrasal compounds for the architecture of grammar. Unpublished manuscript.Search in Google Scholar

Trips, Carola. 2014. How to account for the expressive nature of phrasal compounds in a conceptual-semantic framework. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 11(1). 33–61.Search in Google Scholar

Trips, Carola. forthcoming. An analysis of phrasal compounds in the model of parallel architecture. In Pius ten Hacken (ed.), The semantics of compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ward, Gregory. 2004. Equatives and deferred reference. Language 80. 262–289.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331639.003.0004Search in Google Scholar

Ward, Gregory, Richard Sproat & Gail McKoon. 1991. A pragmatic analysis of so-called anaphoric islands. Language 67. 439–474.10.1353/lan.1991.0003Search in Google Scholar

Weiskopf, Daniel A. 2007. Compound nominals, context, and compositionality. Synthese 156. 161–204.10.1007/s11229-005-3489-1Search in Google Scholar

Wiese, Richard. 1996. Phrasal compounds and the theory of word syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 27. 183–252.Search in Google Scholar