Getting Fra Angelico’s splotch out: rehabilitating visual cognitive semiotics

References

Arnheim, Rudolf. 1986. Language, image, and concrete poetry. In New essays on the psychology of art, 90–101. Berkeley: University of California.10.1525/9780520907843-009Search in Google Scholar

Bal, Mieke & Norman Bryson. 1991. Semiotics and art history. Art Bulletin 73. 174–208. https://doi.org/10.2307/3045790.Search in Google Scholar

Bal, Mieke. 1994. Semiotics for beginners. In On meaning-making: Essays in semiotics, 3–20. Sonoma, CA: Polebridge.Search in Google Scholar

Barthes, Roland. 1977. The third meaning. In Image-music-text, Stephen Heath (trans.), 52–68. New York: Hill and Wang.Search in Google Scholar

Belting, Hans. 2005. Image, medium, body: A new approach to iconology. Critical Inquiry 31. 302–319. https://doi.org/10.1086/430962.Search in Google Scholar

Belting, Hans. 2011. An anthropology of images: Picture, medium, body. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400839780Search in Google Scholar

Bühler, Karl. 1982 [1934]. Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Frankfurt: Fischer.Search in Google Scholar

Corrain, Lucia & Paola Gallicchio. 2020. Plastic semiotics and thematic interpretation: For an analysis of the parody in painting. E|C 25. 82–95.Search in Google Scholar

Crossland, Zoë & Alexander Bauer. 2017. Im/materialities: Things and signs. Semiotic Review 4. 1–18.Search in Google Scholar

Damisch, Hubert. 1979. Sur la sémiologie de la peinture. In Seymour Chatman, Umberto Eco & Jean-Marie Klinkenberg (eds.), A semiotic landscape: Proceedings of the first congress of International Association for Semiotics Studies, 128–136. Hague: Nijhoff.10.1515/9783110803327-015Search in Google Scholar

Didi-Huberman, Georges. 1989. The art of not describing: Vermeer – the detail and the patch. History of the Human Sciences 2. 135–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/095269518900200201.Search in Google Scholar

Didi-Huberman, Georges. 1990. Fra Angelico: Dissemblance and figuration. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Didi-Huberman, Georges. 2005 [1990]. Confronting images: Questioning the ends of a certain history of art. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Drecher, Jochen. 2003. The symbol and the theory of the life-world: The transcendences of the life-world and their overcoming by signs and symbols. Human Studies 26. 141–163. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1024014620368.10.1023/A:1024014620368Search in Google Scholar

Eco, Umberto. 1976. A theory of semiotics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.10.1007/978-1-349-15849-2Search in Google Scholar

Eco, Umberto. 1984. Semiotics and the philosophy of language. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.10.1007/978-1-349-17338-9Search in Google Scholar

Elkins, James. 1995. Marks, traces, traits, contours, orli, and splendores: Nonsemiotic elements in pictures. Critical Inquiry 21. 822–860. https://doi.org/10.1086/448776.Search in Google Scholar

Fabbri, Paolo. 2020. Vedere ad arte. Milano: Mimesis.Search in Google Scholar

Floch, Jean-Marie. 1984. Petites mythologies de l’oeil et l’esprit. Paris: Hades.10.1075/as.1Search in Google Scholar

Geoghegan, Bernard D. 2011. From information theory to French theory: Jakobson, Lévi-Strauss, and the cybernetic apparatus. Critical Theory 38. 96–126. https://doi.org/10.1086/661645.Search in Google Scholar

Greimas, Algirdas. 1966. Sémantique structural: Recherche de méthode. Paris: Larousse.Search in Google Scholar

Greimas, Algirdas & Joseph Courtès. 1979. Sémiotique: Dictionnaire raisonné de la théorie du langage. Paris: Hachette.Search in Google Scholar

Groupe, Mu. 2015. Principia semiotica: Aux sources du sens. Bruxelles: Les Impressions Nouvelles.Search in Google Scholar

Gumbrecht, Hans-Ulrich. 2004. Production of presence: What meaning cannot convey. Stanford: Stanford University Press.10.1515/9780804767149Search in Google Scholar

Gurwitsch, Aron. 1957. Théorie du champs de la conscience. Bruges: Desclée de Brouver.Search in Google Scholar

Gurwitsch, Aron. 1974. Phenomenology and the theory of science. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hall, Stuart. 1980. Encoding and decoding in television discourse. In Stuart Hall, Dorothy Hobson, Andrew Lowe & Paul Willis (eds.), Culture, media, language, 128–139. London: Hutchinson.Search in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1960. Linguistics and poetics. In Thomas Sebeok (ed.), Style in language, 350–377. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman & Morris Halle. 1956. Fundamentals of language. Hague: Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Krauss, Rosalind. 1985. Originality of the avant-garde and other modernist myths. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kristeva, Julia. 1980. Giotto’s joy. In Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art, 210–236. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lacan, Jacques. 1977. Écrits: A selection. New York: W. W. Norton.Search in Google Scholar

Lotman, Juri M. 1976. Culture and information. Dispositio 3. 213–215.Search in Google Scholar

Luckmann, Thomas. 1970. On the boundaries of the social world. In Maurice Natanson (ed.), Phenomenology and social reality: Essays in memory of Alfred Schutz, 73–100. Hague: Nijhoff.10.1007/978-94-011-7523-4_5Search in Google Scholar

Marin, Louis. 1989. Opacité de la peinture: Essais sur la representation au Quattrocento. Paris: EHESS.Search in Google Scholar

Mitchell, William J. T. 2005. What do pictures want? The lives and loves of images. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226245904.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Moles, Abraham. 1981. L’image, communication fonctionnelle. Paris: Casterman.Search in Google Scholar

Moxey, Keith. 2013. Visual time: The image in history. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1515/9780822395935Search in Google Scholar

Mukarovsky, Jan. 1977. Poetic designation and the aesthetic function of language. In The word and verbal art: Selected essays by Jan Mukařovský 65–73. New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nagel, Alexander. 1996. Review of Georges Didi-Huberman, Fra Angelico: Dissemblance and figuration. Art Bulletin 78. 559–565. https://doi.org/10.2307/3046201.Search in Google Scholar

Paolucci, Claudio. 2020. Cognitive semiotics: Integrating signs, minds, meaning and cognition. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-42986-7Search in Google Scholar

Posner, Roland. 2011. Post-modernism, post-structuralism, post-semiotics? Sign theory at the fin de siècle. Semiotica 183. 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2011.002.Search in Google Scholar

Preziosi, Donald. 1979. Architecture, language, and meaning: The origins of the built world and its semiotic organization. Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783110808674Search in Google Scholar

Reddy, Michael. 1979. The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In Andrew Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought, 284–310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Shannon, Claude & Warren Weaver. 1949. The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sonesson, Göran. 1989. Pictorial concepts. Lund: Lund University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sonesson, Göran. 2010. From mimicry to mime by way of mimesis: Reflections on a general theory of iconicity. Sign Systems Studies 38(1). 18–66. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2010.38.1-4.02.Search in Google Scholar

Sonesson, Göran. 2014. Translation and other acts of meaning: In between cognitive semiotics and semiotics of culture. Cognitive Semiotics 7. 249–280. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem-2014-0016.Search in Google Scholar

Sonesson, Göran. 2016. The phenomenological semiotics of iconicity and pictoriality. Language and Semiotic Studies 2. 1–73.10.1515/lass-2016-020201Search in Google Scholar

Schutz, Alfred. 1962 [1955]. Symbol, reality, and society. In The problem of social reality (Collected Papers 1), 287–365. The Hague: Nijhoff.10.1007/978-94-010-2851-6_11Search in Google Scholar

Sperber, Dan. 1975. Rethinking symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Testa, Bart. 2002. Film theory and enunciation. Semiotic Review of Books 12. 7–18.Search in Google Scholar

Vandenberghe, Frédéric. 2003. The nature of culture: Towards a realist phenomenology of material, animal, and human nature. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 33. 461–475. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-5914.2003.00226.x.Search in Google Scholar

Wolff, Janet. 2012. After cultural theory: The power of images, the lure of immediacy. Journal of Visual Culture 11. 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412911430461.Search in Google Scholar