Pyrrhonian Scepticism, the Infinite Regress of Reasons, and Ancient Infinitism

References

Annas, J. and J. Barnes (2000): Sextus Empiricus: Outlines of Scepticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Barnes, J. (1976): “Aristotle, Menaechmus, and Circular Proof”, Classical Quarterly 26, pp. 278–292.10.1017/S0009838800033152Search in Google Scholar

– (1990a): The Toils of Scepticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

– (1990b): “Some Ways of Scepticism”. In: S. Everson (ed.): Companions to Ancient Thought 1: Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 204–222.Search in Google Scholar

– (1992): “Diogenes Laertius IX 61–116: The Philosophy of Pyrrhonism”. In: W. Hasse and H. Temporini (eds): Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II.36.6. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 4241–4301.10.1515/9783110864298-007Search in Google Scholar

Bett, R. (2000): Pyrrho, his Antecedents, and his Legacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199256617.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

– (2005): Sextus Empiricus: Against the Logicians. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815232Search in Google Scholar

– (2012): Sextus Empiricus: Against the Physicists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781139048811Search in Google Scholar

Brandom, R. B. (1994): Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Entitlement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Brennan, T. and J. J. Lee (2014): “A Relative Improvement”, Phronesis 59, pp. 246–271.10.1163/15685284-12341268Search in Google Scholar

Brunschwig, J. (1990): “La formule ὅσον ἐπὶ τῷ λόγῳ chez Sextus Empiricus”. In: A.-J. Voelke (ed.): Le scepticisme antique. Genève: Cahiers de la Revue de théologie et de philosophie, pp. 107–121.Search in Google Scholar

Bullock, J. B. (2016): “The Challenges of the Modes of Agrippa”, Apeiron 49, pp. 409–435.10.1515/apeiron-2015-0077Search in Google Scholar

Caizzi, F. D. (1992): “Aenesidemus and the Academy”, Classical Quarterly 42, pp. 176–189.10.1017/S0009838800042671Search in Google Scholar

Catapano, M. (2017): “The Argument from the Infinite Regress of Reasons in Sextus Empiricus”, Antiquorum Philosophia 11, pp. 115–127.Search in Google Scholar

– (2018): Sesto empirico e i tropi della sospensione del giudizio. Amsterdam: Adolf M. Hakkert.Search in Google Scholar

Fogelin, R. (1994): Pyrrhonian Reflections on Knowledge and Justification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0195089871.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. (1995): The Sceptics. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Klein, P. (2007): “Human Knowledge and the Infinite Progress of Reasoning”, Philosophical Studies 134, pp. 1–17.10.1007/s11098-006-9012-9Search in Google Scholar

Lammenranta, M. (2008): “The Pyrrhonian Problematic”. In: J. Greco (ed.): The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 9–33.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195183214.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Long, A. A. and D. N. Sedley (1987): The Hellenistic Philosophers, 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165907Search in Google Scholar

Morison, B. (2011): “The Logical Structure of the Sceptic’s Oppositions”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 40, pp. 265–295.Search in Google Scholar

– (2019): “The Sceptic’s Modes of Argumentation”. In: T. Bénatouïl and K. Ierodiakonou (eds): Dialectic after Plato and Aristotle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 283–319.10.1017/9781108681810.011Search in Google Scholar

Mutschmann, H. ed. (1984): Sexti Empirici Opera, Vol. 2. Leipzig: Teubner.Search in Google Scholar

Mutschmann, H. and J. Mau eds. (1958): Sexti Empirici Opera, Vol. 1. Leipzig: Teubner.Search in Google Scholar

Nawar, T. (2014): “The Stoic Account of Apprehension”, Philosophers’ Imprint 14, pp. 1–21.Search in Google Scholar

– (2015): “Aristotelian Finitism”, Synthese 192, pp. 2345–2360.10.1007/s11229-015-0827-9Search in Google Scholar

– (2017): “Platonic Know-How and Successful Action”, European Journal of Philosophy 25, pp. 944–962.10.1111/ejop.12285Search in Google Scholar

– (2018): “Thrasymachus’ Unerring Skill and the Arguments of Republic I”, Phronesis 63, pp. 359–391.10.1163/15685284-12341354Search in Google Scholar

– (2020): “The Stoic Theory of the Soul”. In: K. Arenson (ed.): The Routledge Handbook of Hellenistic Philosophy. Abingdon: Routledge, 2020, pp. 148–159.10.4324/9781351168120-12Search in Google Scholar

– (2021): “Dynamic Modalities and Teleological Agency: Plato and Aristotle on Skill and Ability”. In: T. Johansen (ed.): Productive Knowledge in Ancient Philosophy: The Concept of Technê. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021, pp. 39–61.10.1017/9781108641579.003Search in Google Scholar

– (2022a): “Conflicting Appearances, Suspension of Judgement, and Pyrrhonian Skepticism without Commitment”, Journal of the History of Philosophy 60, pp. 537–560.10.1353/hph.2022.0052Search in Google Scholar

– (2022b): “Clear and Distinct Perception in the Stoics, Augustine, and William of Ockham”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 96, pp. 185–207.10.1093/arisup/akac002Search in Google Scholar

Pollock, J. L. (1974): Knowledge and Justification. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400870738Search in Google Scholar

Powers, N. (2010): “The System of the Sceptical Modes in Sextus Empiricus”, Apeiron 43, pp. 157–172.10.1515/APEIRON.2010.43.4.157Search in Google Scholar

Ross, W. D. and F. H. Fobes (1929): Theophrastus: Metaphysics, With Translation, Commentary and Introduction. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sienkiewicz, S. (2019): Five Modes of Scepticism: Sextus Empiricus and the Agrippan Modes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198798361.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Woodruff, P. (2010): “The Pyrrhonian Modes”. In: R. Bett (ed.): The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Skepticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 208–231.10.1017/CCOL9780521874762.012Search in Google Scholar