Home Epithelial nitric oxide synthases (eNOS) 894 G < T polymorphism and diabetic nephropathy susceptibility: A meta-analysis
Article Open Access

Epithelial nitric oxide synthases (eNOS) 894 G < T polymorphism and diabetic nephropathy susceptibility: A meta-analysis

  • Hui Li , Guiqin Shu and Huihui Gao EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: September 26, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the epithelial nitric oxide synthases (eNOS) 894 G < T polymorphism and diabetic nephropathy (DN) susceptibility by pooling the open published data.

Methods

Studies relevant to eNOS 894 G < T polymorphism and DN susceptibility published in PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, CNKI, and Wanfang databases were systematically screened by using the text words of endothelial nitric oxide synthase, eNOS, NOS-3, G894T, rs179983, polymorphism, diabetic nephropathy, and DN. The correlation between eNOS 894 G < T polymorphism and DN susceptibility was demonstrated by odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI). The data were combined through fixed or random effect model according to statistical heterogeneity. The publication bias was assessed by Begg’s funnel plot and Egger’s line regression test.

Results

Twenty-six case-control studies relevant to eNOS 894 G < T polymorphism and DN susceptibility were identified by electronic searching of the related databases. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2MD) patients with T allele had increased susceptibility to DN compared with G allele under homologous gene model (TT vs GG) (OR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.16–1.69, p = 0.001), dominant gene model (TT + GT) vs GG (OR = 1.61, 95% CI: 1.30–2.00, p = 0.000) and recessive gene model TT vs (GT + GG) (OR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.16–1.66, p = 0.000). Publication bias was not statistically significant for homologous and recessive gene model.

Conclusion

Based on the present evidence, DN risk was increased in T2MD cases with T allele compared to G allele.

1 Introduction

Diabetic nephropathy (DN), the major microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus (DM), is one of the leading causes of DM related death [1]. Epidemiology study indicated that about one-third of cases with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) would eventually develop to DN [2]. At present, the exact pathogenesis of DN is not completely clear yet. Studies have shown that persistent hyperglycemia, hypertension, and proteinuria were the major risk factors of DN [3,4]. Recently, publications also indicated that inherited factors such as single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of certain genes played a key role in the development of DN [5]. At present, more than ten genes have been found to be associated with DN, including inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), aldose reductase (Art), methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) genes, and so on. Regulation of iNOS activity/expression and the role of iNOS agonists can be applied as potential therapeutic agents in the treatment of insulin resistance, T2DM, and heart failure [6].

Human eNOS gene is located on chromosome 7 and contains 26 exons and 25 introns with a total length of 21 kp. G894T polymorphism is the mutation of the 894 base G in the 7th exon of eNOS gene into T, which results in the change in the encoding protein product from glutamic acid to aspartic acid, and the protein structure from helix type to tight circle type, thus theoretically affecting the activity of eNOS and the production of NO and becoming an important factor of DN susceptibility. Previous studies have investigated the association of eNOS 894 G < T polymorphism and DN susceptibility, but had inconclusive conclusions. El-Din Bessa and Hamdy [7] found that the TT genotype of G894T may be the inducing factor of DN-derived end-stage renal disease in the evaluation of Egyptian population. Ezzidi et al. [8] also found that the TT genotype frequency in DM cases with DN of African population was significantly increased compared to DM patients without DN. However, Mackawy et al. [9] found no correlation between eNOS G894T and DN risk in their study of Saudi Arabian population. In order to further evaluate eNOS 894 G < T polymorphism and DN susceptibility, we searched and summarized the published literature and made the present meta-analysis.

2 Material and methods

2.1 Publication searching and inclusion

Case-control or cohort studies relevant to eNOS 894 G < T polymorphism and DN susceptibility were systematically and electronically searched in PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, CNKI, and Wanfang databases by using the text word of endothelial nitric oxide synthase, eNOS, NOS 3, G894T, rs179983, polymorphism, diabetic nephropathy, and DN. The references of the included studies were also reviewed in order to find the potential suitable publications. The studies inclusion criteria was (1) case control or cohort studies relevant to eNOS 894 G < T polymorphism and DN susceptibility; (2) studies in human being and not animal; (3) studies published in English or Chinese; (4) TT, TG, and GG allele distribution was provided or can be calculated from the original studies; (5) DN is caused by T2DM; (6) the control was T2DM cases without DN. Exclusion criteria was (1) duplicated publications or data; (2) case report of literature review; (3) not enough data especially TT, TG, and GG allele distribution was not provided in the original studies; (4) studies published in other languages and not in English or Chinese.

2.2 Data extraction

The data of each included publication were extracted by two reviewers (Hui and Guiqin) independently and made cross checking. In case of disagreement, the corresponding author (Gao) was consulted for final decision. The extracted data and information were as follows: (1) The first author’s name; (2) publication period; (3) source of literature; (4) number of patients in the original study; (5) ethnicity of patients (region); (6) Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) score of each included study; (7) TT, TG, and GG allele distribution of each study; (8) Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) of control groups.

2.3 Methodological assessment of the study

The methodological quality of each included study was evaluated by the NOS, in which a study awarded 6 or more was considered of a high-quality study, otherwise was deemed as low-quality study.

2.4 Statistical analysis

STATA16.0 statistical software was applied for data analysis. Before pooling the results, the data were examined for statistical heterogeneity by I 2 test. If statistical heterogeneity existed (I 2 > 50%, p < 0.05), the data were combined through random effect model, otherwise, by fixed effect mode. Two tails p < 0.05 was considered statistically different.

3 Results

3.1 General characteristics of the included 26 studies

After searching the relevant electronic databases and screening of studies, 26 case control studies [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32] relevant to eNOS gene 894 G < T polymorphisms and risk of DN were identified and included for meta-analysis. The searched studies and inclusion flow-chart is demonstrated in Figure 1. Most of the included studies were of HWE except for Rahimi, Tiwari, and An’s work. The methodological quality of the included 26 studies was relatively high with the range of NOS score from 5 to 7. The main features of the included 26 studies are demonstrated in Table 1.

Figure 1 
                  The electronic searching of publications and studies inclusion flow-chart.
Figure 1

The electronic searching of publications and studies inclusion flow-chart.

Table 1

The main features of the included studies

Study Year Ethnicity DN DM without DN HWE NOS
GG GT TT GG GT TT
Ahluwalia et al. [24] 2008 South Asian 82 81 32 125 105 25 0.669 6
El-Din Bessa and Hamdy [7] 2011 African 10 18 12 17 19 4 0.694 6
Cai et al. [22] 1998 Caucasian 65 44 7 148 109 27 0.295 6
Cheema et al. [29] 2013 South Asian 118 150 51 252 240 201 0.470 6
Ezzidi et al. [8] 2007 African 185 247 81 165 195 41 0.131 7
Huo et al. [31] 2015 East Asian 373 54 4 315 92 13 0.057 6
Mackawy et al. [9] 2014 West Asian 15 15 10 16 17 7 0.508 6
Narne et al. [30] 2014 South Asian 85 64 3 114 46 2 0.263 7
Rahimi et al. [27] 2012 West Asian 68 45 13 39 17 7 0.030 6
Shoukry et al. [28] 2012 South Asian 66 94 40 99 77 24 0.141 7
Santos et al. [26] 2011 Caucasian 176 166 32 118 95 22 0.651 7
Shin Marne et al. [23] 2004 East Asian 95 23 0 52 7 0 0.628 7
Tiwari et al. [25] 2009 South Asian 114 45 7 147 59 14 0.020 6
Moguib et al. [32] 2017 African 105 46 12 16 18 2 0.285 7
An et al. [33] 2015 East Asian 58 15 13 110 26 9 <0.001 5
Cheng et al. [11] 2016 East Asan 23 18 0 22 12 0 0.211 5
Dong et al. [12] 2005 East Asian 39 30 0 49 15 0 0.288 7
Dai and Zhang [13] 2012 East Asian 31 29 0 44 16 0 0.233 6
Fu et al. [14] 2007 East Asian 33 28 0 64 14 0 0.384 6
Li et al. [15] 2002 East Asian 44 34 1 49 15 0 0.288 7
Li et al. [16] 2004 East Asian 57 37 0 85 15 0 0.417 7
Lv et al. [17] 2002 East Asian 44 34 1 49 15 0 0.228 6
Lv et al. [18] 2003 East Asian 27 18 0 42 10 0 0.443 7
Ma et al. [19] 2006 East Asian 125 42 0 115 17 0 0.429 6
Rao et al. [20] 2012 East Asian 22 17 0 38 11 0 0.376 7
Wang et al. [21] 2005 East Asian 33 28 0 64 14 0 0.384 6

4 Meta-analysis

4.1 In homologous gene model (TT vs GG)

Before data combination, the statistical heterogeneity across the included 26 studies was assessed in the aspects of homologous gene model (TT vs CC). The statistical heterogeneity was not statistically different (I 2 = 14.0%, p = 261). Thus, the odds ratio (OR) was combined through fixed effect model and results showed T2MD patients with TT allele had increased risk of susceptibility to DN compared with GG allele (OR = 1.40, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.16–1.69, p = 0.001), Figure 2.

Figure 2 
                  Forest plot of eNOS 894 G < T polymorphism and DN susceptibility in homologous gene model (TT vs GG).
Figure 2

Forest plot of eNOS 894 G < T polymorphism and DN susceptibility in homologous gene model (TT vs GG).

4.2 In dominant gene model (TT + GT) vs GG

Due to significant statistical heterogeneity across the studies (I 2 = 75.6%, p = 0.000), the OR was combined in random effect with dominant gene model (TT + GT) vs GG. The combined data showed that susceptibility to DN in T2MD cases with TT or GT allele had significant elevated compared to cases with GG allele (OR = 1.61, 95% CI: 1.30–2.00, p = 0.000), Figure 3.

Figure 3 
                  Forest plot of eNOS 894 G < T polymorphism and DN susceptibility in dominant gene model (TT + GT) vs GG.
Figure 3

Forest plot of eNOS 894 G < T polymorphism and DN susceptibility in dominant gene model (TT + GT) vs GG.

4.3 In recessive gene model TT vs (GT + GG)

Due to non-statistical heterogeneity, the data were combined by fixed effect (I 2 = 0.0%, p = 0.462) in recessive gene model. The combined OR showed that T2MD cases with TT allele had significant elevated susceptibility to DN compared to cases with GG or GT allele (OR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.16–1.66, p = 0.000), Figure 4.

Figure 4 
                  Forest plot of eNOS 894 G < T polymorphism and DN susceptibility in recessive gene model TT vs (GT + GG).
Figure 4

Forest plot of eNOS 894 G < T polymorphism and DN susceptibility in recessive gene model TT vs (GT + GG).

4.4 Subgroup analysis

Subgroup analysis was made according to ethnicity. The detailed pooled ORs of different ethnicities for eNOS 894 G < T polymorphism and DN susceptibility are shown in Table 2.

Table 2

ORs of different ethnicities for eNOS 894 G < T polymorphism and DN susceptibility

Gene model Ethnicity No. of studies I 2 (%) P Q Statistical heterogeneity OR 95% CI P-value
Homologous (TT vs GG) African 3 31.0 0.235 No 1.86 1.25–2.76 0.002
Caucasian 2 0.0 0.353 No 0.83 0.51–1.34 0.435
Asian
South 5 42.9 0.136 No 1.58 1.19–2.10 0.002
East 14 0.0 0.617 No 1.07 0.62–1.86 0.805
West 2 0.0 0.652 1.23 0.57–2.66 0.591
Dominant (TT + GT) vs GG African 3 77.0 0.013 Yes 1.04 0.49–2.23 0.914
Caucasian 2 4.9 0.305 No 1.02 0.78–1.34 0.874
Asian
South 5 52.7 0.0427 Yes 1.50 1.17–1.93 0.002
East 14 82.1 0.000 Yes 2.18 1.40–3.40 0.001
West 2 0.0 0.691 No 1.29 0.78–2.15 0.325
Recessive TT vs (GT + GG) African 3 0.0 0.412 No 1.77 1.22–2.55 0.003
Caucasian 2 0.0 0.454 No 0.80 0.50–1.27 0.339
Asian
South 5 3.3 0.388 No 1.61 1.23–2.11 0.001
East 14 0.0 0.735 No 1.04 0.60–1.80 0.891
West 2 0.0 0.472 No 1.17 0.57–2.42 0.670

4.5 Publication bias evaluation

In the homologous and recessive gene models, Begg’s funnel plots were general left and right symmetrical, which demonstrated no potential publication bias (Figure 5). The Egger’s line regression test also indicated non-publication bias (p homologous = 0.994, p recessive = 0.493). However, in dominant gene model, the Begg’s funnel plot was obvious left-right asymmetry (Figure 6), and Egger’s line regression test also indicated significant publication bias (p = 0.003).

Figure 5 
                  Begg’s funnel plot for evaluation publication bias in homologous (a) and recessive (b) gene models.
Figure 5

Begg’s funnel plot for evaluation publication bias in homologous (a) and recessive (b) gene models.

Figure 6 
                  Begg’s funnel plot for evaluation publication bias in dominant gene model.
Figure 6

Begg’s funnel plot for evaluation publication bias in dominant gene model.

5 Discussion

In the present meta-analysis, 26 relevant high methodological quality case-control studies were included and made data combination. Generally, the pooled data showed that T2DM patients with T allele had increased susceptibility to DN compared with G allele under homologous gene model (TT vs GG) (OR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.16–1.69, p = 0.001), dominant gene model (TT + GT) vs GG (OR = 1.61, 95% CI: 1.30–2.00, p = 0.000), and recessive gene model TT vs (GT + GG) (OR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.16–1.66, p = 0.000), which indicates that T2DM cases with T allele had increased risk of developing DN compared to G allele. However, subgroup analysis showed the correlation between eNOS 894 G < T polymorphism and DN susceptibility did not reach statistically significant in homologous gene model of Caucasian, East Asian, and West Asian, in dominant gene model of African, Caucasian, and West Asian, and in recessive gene model of Caucasian, East Asian, and West Asian. The non-statistically significant correlation may be due to the small sample size of the sub-group analysis.

Previous study has found that endothelial cells can produce a substance called nitric oxide (NO) that induces vascular relaxation under the induction of bradykinin [34]. NO consists of one nitrogen atom and one oxygen atom, which is a gaseous lipophilic molecule that exists for a short time. NO can regulate vascular tension, inhibit platelet aggregation and adhesion, and inhibit smooth muscle cell proliferation. As an important active substance in human body, NO also participates in various physiological and pathological regulations. Therefore, abnormal synthesis and release of NO may lead to a variety of diseases. Endogenous NO is synthesized from l-arginine guanidine terminal nitrogen atom and molecular oxygen under the catalysis of NOS. There are three NOS genes in the human genome, namely, neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS or NOS-1), inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS or NOS-2), and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS or NOS-3). eNOS is mainly expressed in vascular endothelial cells and is involved in vascular tension. Studies have shown that eNOS plays an important role in hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy, coronary heart disease, ischemic cerebrovascular disease, and DN [35,36].

NO can regulate renal hemodynamics and renal tubular reabsorption function, and play an important role in maintaining renal structure and function. When NO synthesis is inhibited or the concentration of NO is reduced, the renal blood flow can be reduced, and oxygen supply is affected to a certain extent, resulting in renal damage. Human eNOS gene is located on chromosome 7 and contains 26 exons and 25 introns with a total length of 21 kp. G894T polymorphism is the mutation of the 894 base G in the 7th exon of eNOS gene into T, resulting in the change in the encoding protein product from glutamic acid to aspartic acid, and the protein structure from helix type to tight circle type, thus affecting the activity of eNOS and the generation of NO and becoming an important factor of DN susceptibility. However, the meta-analysis also had limitations (1) language striction, only studies published in English or Chinese had been screened and included; (2) publication bias, signification bias existed in dominant gene model; (3) confounding factors, the pathogenesis of DN is complex and affected by multiple genes and the environment. The present meta-analysis only evaluated the susceptibility to eNOS gene G894T polymorphic site and DN risk, without considering the influence of gene–gene or gene–environment interaction; (4) small sample size for subgroup analysis, the sample size of different ethnicities was relatively small with limited statistical power.

6 Conclusion

In conclusion, our present meta-analysis demonstrated that T2DM cases with eNOS 894T allele had 1.16–1.61 times higher risk of developing DN than T2DM patients with G allele. DN risk was obviously increased in T2DM cases with eNOS 894T allele. Therefore, due to limitations of the present work, high-quality studies with large samples, multi-centers, different regions, different populations, and different types of diabetes are still needed to further clarify the relationship between eNOS gene G894T polymorphism and DN susceptibility, which is of great significance for DN screening, early diagnosis, and treatment.

  1. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  2. Data availability statement: The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request

References

[1] Soskić SS, Dobutović BD, Sudar EM, Obradović MM, Nikolić DM, Djordjevic JD, et al. Regulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and its potential role in insulin resistance, diabetes and heart failure. Open Cardiovasc Med J. 2011;5:153–63.10.2174/1874192401105010153Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[2] Lizicarova D, Krahulec B, Hirnerova E, Gaspar L, Celecova Z. Risk factors in diabetic nephropathy progression at present. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2014;115(8):517–21.10.4149/BLL_2014_101Search in Google Scholar

[3] Moţa E, Panduru MN, Popa SG, Moţa M. Risk factors for diabetic nephropathy: intrinsic or extrinsic renal. Rom J Intern Med. 2009;47(4):397–401.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Ayodele OE, Alebiosu CO, Salako BL. Diabetic nephropathy-a review of the natural history, burden, risk factors and treatment. J Natl Med Assoc. 2004;96(11):1445–54.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Albert C, Kube J, Albert A, Schanze D, Zenker M, Mertens PR. Cubilin single nucleotide polymorphism variants are associated with macroangiopathy while a matrix Metalloproteinase-9 single nucleotide polymorphism flip-flop may indicate susceptibility of diabetic nephropathy in type-2 diabetic patients. Nephron. 2019;141(3):156–65.10.1159/000494391Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Muzurović E, Stanković Z, Kovačević Z, Škrijelj BŠ, Mikhailidis DP. Inflammatory markers associated with diabetes mellitus - old and new players. Curr Pharm Des. 2021;27(27):3020–35.10.2174/1381612826666201125103047Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] El-Din Bessa SS, Hamdy SM. Impact of nitric oxide synthase Glu298Asp polymorphism on the development of end-stage renal disease in type 2 diabetic Egyptian patients. Ren Fail. 2011;33(9):878–84.10.3109/0886022X.2011.605978Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] Ezzidi I, Mtiraoui N, Mohamed MB, Mahjoub T, Kacem M, Almawi WY. Association of endothelial nitric oxide synthase Glu298Asp, 4b/a, and -786T > C gene variants with diabetic nephropathy. J Diabetes Complications. 2008;22(5):331–8.10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2007.11.011Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Mackawy AM, Khan AA, Mel-S B. Association of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene G894T polymorphism with the risk of diabetic nephropathy in Qassim region, Saudi Arabia-A pilot study. Meta Gene. 2014;2:392–402.10.1016/j.mgene.2014.04.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[10] An X, Cui W, Song D. Association of concomitant presence of endothelial nitric oxide synthase and angiotension converting enzyme olymorphism with diabetic kidney disease. J Kunming Med Univ. 2015;36(11):12–6.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Cheng J, Zhou H, Huang Z. Association of the polymorphisms of endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene with type 2 diabetic nephropathy. J Chin Pract Diag Ther. 2016;30(1):24–6.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Dong Y, Qu S, Lv W. Gene polymorphism in chromosome 7q35 and susceptibility to diabetic nephropathy. Chin J Endocrinol Metab. 2005;21(1):47–50.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Dai H, Zhang Y. An association study of MTHFR and eNOS genes polymorphism with diabetic nephropathy. Chin J Trauma Disability Med. 2012;20(6):4–6.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Fu Z, Li C, Wang Z. Coexistence of aldose reduction gene and endothelial nitric oxide synthase polymorphisms associates with diabetic nephropathy. J Clin Rehabilitat Tissue Eng Res. 2007;11(34):6893–6.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Li C, Dong Y, Lv W. The association between polymorphism of endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene and diabetic nephropathy. Chin J Intern Med. 2001;40(11):729–32.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Li C, Lv S, Qi Y. Association study of 894G → Tmutation at exon 7 of endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene and diabetic nephropathy with hypertension. Acta Acad Med Qingdao Univ. 2004;40(3):200–2.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Lv W, Dong Y, Wang H. A study of the association between polymorphism of endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene and diabetic nephropathy. Chin J Diabetes. 2001;10(2):81–3.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Lv S, Xing Q, Li C. Association between 894G → T polymorphism at exon 7 of endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene and diabetic nephropathy with or without hypertension. Chin J Multiple Organ Dis Elder. 2003;2(4):275–311.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Ma J, Yu D, Liu D. Rlationship between the G894T mutation of the endothelial-constitutive nitric oxide synthase (ecNOS) and type 2 diabetic microangiopathies. Chinese J Diabetes. 2007;15(8):471–3.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Rao G, Chen E, Lin H. The correlation of eNOS gene polymorphism and susceptibility to diabetic nephropathy. China Mod Dr. 2012;50(7):49–50.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Wang Q, Xiao Z, Hu B. Association between 894G → T polymorphism at 7 of endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene and diabetic nephropathy. Acta Univ Med Nanjing Nat Sci. 2005;25(6):424–6.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Cai H, Wang X, Colagiuri S, Wilcken DE. A common Glu298-> Asp (894G-> T) mutation at exon 7 of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene and vascular complications in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1998;21(12):2195–6.10.2337/diacare.21.12.2195Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] Shin Shin Y, Baek SH, Chang KY, Park CW, Yang CW, Jin DC, et al. Relations between eNOS Glu298Asp polymorphism and progression of diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2004;65(3):257–65.10.1016/j.diabres.2004.01.010Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[24] Ahluwalia TS, Ahuja M, Rai TS, Kohli HS, Sud K, Bhansali A, et al. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene haplotypes and diabetic nephropathy among Asian Indians. Mol Cell Biochem. 2008;314(1–2):9–17.10.1007/s11010-008-9759-8Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[25] Tiwari AK, Prasad P, Thelma BK, Kumar KP, Ammini AC, Gupta A, et al. Oxidative stress pathway genes and chronic renal insufficiency in Asian Indians with Type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Complications. 2009;23(2):102–11.10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2007.10.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[26] Santos KG, Crispim D, Canani LH, Ferrugem PT, Gross JL, Roisenberg I. Association of eNOS gene polymorphisms with renal disease in Caucasians with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011;91(3):353–62.10.1016/j.diabres.2010.12.029Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] Rahimi Z, Vaisi-Raygani A, Rahimi Z, Parsian A. Concomitant presence of endothelial nitric oxide 894T and angiotensin II-converting enzyme D alleles are associated with diabetic nephropathy in a Kurdish population from Western Iran. Nephrology (Carlton). 2012;17(2):175–81.10.1111/j.1440-1797.2011.01533.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[28] Shoukry A, Shalaby SM, Abdelazim S, Abdelazim M, Ramadan A, Ismail MI, et al. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphisms and the risk of diabetic nephropathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2012;16(6):574–9.10.1089/gtmb.2011.0218Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[29] Cheema BS, Kohli HS, Sharma R, Bhansali A, Khullar M. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphisms and renal responsiveness to RAS inhibition therapy in type 2 diabetic Asian Indians. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2013;99(3):335–42.10.1016/j.diabres.2012.11.024Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[30] Narne P, Ponnaluri KC, Siraj M, Ishaq M. Polymorphisms in oxidative stress pathway genes and risk of diabetic nephropathy in South Indian type 2 diabetic patients. Nephrology (Carlton). 2014;19(10):623–9.10.1111/nep.12293Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[31] Huo P, Zhang D, Guan X, Mei Y, Zheng H, Feng X. Association between genetic polymorphisms of ACE & eNOS and diabetic nephropathy. Mol Biol Rep. 2015;42(1):27–33.10.1007/s11033-014-3736-ySearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[32] Moguib O, Raslan HM, Abdel Rasheed I, Effat L, Mohamed N, El Serougy S, et al. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene (T786C and G894T) polymorphisms in Egyptian patients with type 2 diabetes. J Genet Eng Biotechnol. 2017;15(2):431–6.10.1016/j.jgeb.2017.05.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[33] An XH, Cui WL, Song DP. The association of concomitant presence of endothelial nitric oxide synthase and angiotensin converting enzyme polymorphism with diabetic kidney disease. J Kunming Med Univ. 2015;36(11):12–6.Search in Google Scholar

[34] Ignarro LJ, Byrns RE, Buga GM, Wood KS. Endothelium-derived relaxing factor from pulmonary artery and vein possesses pharmacologic and chemical properties identical to those of nitric oxide radical. Circ Res. 1987;61(6):866–79.10.1161/01.RES.61.6.866Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[35] Markus HS, Ruigrok Y, Ali N, Powell JF. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase exon 7 polymorphism, ischemic cerebrovascular disease, and carotid atheroma. Stroke. 1998;29(9):1908–11.10.1161/01.STR.29.9.1908Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[36] Tessari P. Nitric oxide in the normal kidney and in patients with diabetic nephropathy. J Nephrol. 2015;28(3):257–68.10.1007/s40620-014-0136-2Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2022-06-26
Revised: 2022-09-03
Accepted: 2022-09-06
Published Online: 2022-09-26

© 2022 Hui Li et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 16.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/pteridines-2022-0042/html
Scroll to top button