“I look with deep gratitude and admiration…” – praising and complimenting in papal speeches

References

Accattoli, Luigi. 1997. Quando il Papa chiede perdono. Milan: Mondadori.Search in Google Scholar

Alfonzetti, Giovanna. 2013. Compliments. In Ken Turner & Marina Sbisà (eds.), Pragmatics of speech actions, 555–586. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110214383.555Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, Benedict. 1983. Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.Search in Google Scholar

Bargiela-Chiappini, Francesca & Dániel Z. Kádár (eds.). 2011. Politeness across cultures. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230305939Search in Google Scholar

Bayraktaroğlu, Arın & Maria Sifianou (eds.). 2001. Linguistic politeness across boundaries: The case of Greek and Turkish, 391–430. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.88Search in Google Scholar

Bell, Allan. 1984. Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13. 145–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/s004740450001037x.Search in Google Scholar

Bell, Allan. 1991. The language of news media. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Bobrownicka, Maria. 2006. Patologie tożsamości narodowej w postkomunistycznych krajach słowiańskich [Pathologies of national identity in post-communist Slavic countries]. Kraków: Univeristas.Search in Google Scholar

Bowers, John W. 1963. Language intensity, social introversion, and attitude change. Speech Monographs 30. 345–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637756309375380.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness. Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813085Search in Google Scholar

Burgers, Christian & Anneke De Graaf. 2013. Language intensity as a sensationalistic new feature: The influence of style on sensationalism perceptions and effects. Communications 38(2). 167–188. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2013-0010.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Rong. 2010. Compliment and compliment response research: A cross-cultural survey. In Trossborg Anna (ed.), Pragmatics across languages and cultures, 79–101. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110214444.1.79Search in Google Scholar

Chilton, Paul. 1990. Politeness, politics and diplomacy. Discourse & Society 1. 201–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926590001002005.Search in Google Scholar

Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analyzing political discourse: Theory and practice. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203561218Search in Google Scholar

Chilton, Paul & Monika Kopytowska (eds.). 2018. Religion, language, and the human mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190636647.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, Raymond. 1987. Theatre of power: The art of diplomatic signalling. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Danziger, Roni. 2018. Compliments and compliment responses in Israeli Hebrew: Hebrew university in Jerusalem students in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 124. 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.12.004.Search in Google Scholar

Drabik, Beata. 2001. Komplement i komplementowanie jako akt mowy i komunikacyjna strategia [Compliment and complimenting as a speech act and communication strategy]. Kraków: Univeristas.Search in Google Scholar

Dynel, Marta & Jan Chovanec (eds.). 2015. Participation in public and social media interactions. (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 256). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.256Search in Google Scholar

Gavriely-Nuri, Dalia. 2015. Israeli peace discourse: A cultural approach to CDA. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.10.1075/dapsac.59Search in Google Scholar

Genovese, Frederica. 2015. Politics ex cathedra: Religious authority and the Pope in modern international relations. Research and Politics 2(4). 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168015612808.Search in Google Scholar

Gleaser, Zygfryd. 2017. Ekumenizm w nauczaniu papieży po Soborze Watykańskim II [Ecumenism in teachings of the Popes after II Vatican Council]. Opole: University of Opole.Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York: Pantheon.Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1979. Footing. Semiotica 25(1). 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1979.25.1-2.1.Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of talk. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania Press.Search in Google Scholar

Herbert, Robert K. 1990. Sex-based differences in compliment behavior. Language in Society 19(2). 201–224. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500014378.Search in Google Scholar

Hodges, Adam. 2013. Discourses of war and peace. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199937271.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Holmes, Janet. 1986. Compliments and compliment responses in New Zealand English. Anthropological Linguistics 28(4). 485–508.Search in Google Scholar

Holmes, Janet. 1988. Paying compliments: A sex preferential positive politeness strategy. Journal of Pragmatics 12(3). 445–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(88)90005-7.Search in Google Scholar

Holmes, Janet. 1995. Women, men and politeness. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Howarth, David. 2000. Discourse. Concepts in the social sciences. Buckingham-Philadelphia: Open University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jenkins, Philip. 2011. The next Christendom: The coming of global Christianity. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jucker, Andreas H. 2009. Speech act research between armchair, field and laboratory. Journal of Pragmatics 41(8). 1611–1635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.02.004.Search in Google Scholar

Jucker, Andreas H. & Irma Taavitsainen. 2014. Complimenting in the history of American English: A metacommunicative expression analysis. In Irma Taavitsainen, Andreas H. Jucker & Jukka Tuominen (eds.), Diachronic corpus pragmatics. (Pragmatics and Beyond) New Series 243, 257–276. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.243.16jucSearch in Google Scholar

Kampf, Zohar. 2015. Political discourse analysis. In Karen Tracy, Todd Sandel & Cornelia Ilie (eds.), International encyclopedia of language and social interaction, 1160–1175. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi096Search in Google Scholar

Kampf, Zohar. 2016. All the best! Performing solidarity in political discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 93(3). 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.12.006.Search in Google Scholar

Kampf, Zohar, Lee Aldar, Roni Danziger & Mia Schreiber. 2019. The pragmatics of amicable interstate communication. Intercultural Pragmatics 16(2). 123–151. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2019-0007.Search in Google Scholar

Kampf, Zohar & Roni Danziger. 2019. ‘You dribble faster than Messi and jump higher than Jordan’: The art of complimenting and praising in political discourse. Journal of Politeness Research 15(1). 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2016-0044.Search in Google Scholar

King, Matt & Mark van Roojen. 2013. Praising and blaming. In Marina Sbisà & Ken Turner (eds.), Pragmatics of speech actions, 467–500. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110214383.467Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey N. 1983. Principles of pragmatics. London and New York: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Liebrecht, Christine, Lettica Huxtinz & Margot van Mulken. 2019. The relative power of negativity: The influence of language intensity on perceived strength. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 38(2). 170–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X18808562.Search in Google Scholar

Locher, Miriam & Richard J. Watts. 2005. Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research 1(1). 9–33. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9.Search in Google Scholar

Maíz-Arévalo, Carmen. 2012. “Was that a compliment?” Implicit compliments in English and Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics 44(8). 980–996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.04.004.Search in Google Scholar

Makuchowska, Marzena. 2011. Od wrogów do braci. Posoborowe zmiany w dyskursie Kościoła katolickiego [From enemies to brethren Post-Vatican-Council changes in the discourse of the Catholic Church]. Opole: Uniwersytet Opolski.Search in Google Scholar

Makuchowska, Marzena. 2013. Styl religijny [The religious style]. In Ewa Malinowska, Jolanta Nocoń & Urszula Żydek-Bednarczuk (eds.), Style współczesnej polszczyzny [Styles of the contemporary Polish language], 487–528. Kraków: Univeristas.Search in Google Scholar

Marrus, Michael R. 2008. Papal apologies of Pope John Paul II. In Mark Gibney, Rhoda E. Howard-Hassmann, Jean-Marc Coicaud & Niklaus Steiner (eds.), The age of apology: Facing up to the past, 259–286. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Search in Google Scholar

Messerli, Thomas, C. 2017. Participation structure in fictional discourse: Authors, scpritwriters, audiences and characters. In Miriam A. Locher & Andreas H. Jucker (eds.), Pragmatics of fiction, 25–54. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110431094-002Search in Google Scholar

Morady Moghaddam, Mostafa. 2017. Politeness at the extremes: Iranian women’s insincere responses to compliments. Languages and Dialogues 7(3). 414–431. https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.7.3.05mog.Search in Google Scholar

Morady Moghaddam, Mostafa. 2019. Appraising and reappraising of compliments and the provision of responses. Automatic and non-automatic reactions. Pragmatics 29(3). 410–435. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.18016.mor.Search in Google Scholar

Neff-Van Aertselaer, Joanne, Teun A. Van Dijk, Ulrich Ammon, Rene Dirven & Martin Putz (eds.). 2004. Communicating ideologies: Multidisciplinary perspectives on language, discourse, and social practice (Duisburg Papers on Research in Language and Culture). New York: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Reisigl, Martin. 2008. Rhetoric of political speeches. In Wodak Ruth & Veronika Coller (eds.), Handbook of communication in the public sphere, 243–269. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110198980.3.243Search in Google Scholar

Ress-Miller, Janie. 2011. Compliments revisited: Contemporary compliments and gender. Journal of Pragmatics 43(11). 2673–2688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.04.014.Search in Google Scholar

Scannell, Paddy. 1991. Introduction: The relevance of talk. In Paddy Scannell (ed.), Broadcast, talk, 1–13. London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Schäffner, Christina & Anita L. Wenden (eds.). 2005. Language and peace. New York and London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203984994Search in Google Scholar

Schreurs, Leanne. 2020. Measuring language usage in hospitality situations. Research in Hospitality Management 10(1). 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/22243534.2020.1790203.Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, Geoff & Susan Hunston. 2000. Evaluation: An introduction. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), Evaluation in text. Authorial stance and the construction of discourse, 1–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198238546.003.0001Search in Google Scholar

Van Dijk, Teun. 1998. Discourse as structure and process. London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615184Search in Google Scholar

Werthwein, Daniela Christina. 2009. Already got a compliment today? Wie Australier und Deutsche verbal auf Komplimente reagieren. Asgard: Sankt Augustin.Search in Google Scholar

Wolfson, Nessa. 1983. An empirically based study of complimenting in American English. In Nessa Wolfson & Elliot Judd (eds.), Sociolinguistics and second language acquisition, 82–95. Rowley: Newbury House.Search in Google Scholar

Ицкович, Татьяна. 2019. Система жанров религиозного стиля в коммуникативно-прагматическом аспекте [Itskovich, Tat’yana. 2019. The system of genres of religious style in the communication-pragmatic aspect]. Studia Rossica Posnaniensia XLIV/2. 231–242. https://doi.org/10.14746/strp.2019.44.2.21.Search in Google Scholar

Церьковь. 2007. Церьковь и проблемы современной коммуникации. Сборник статей по матерялам Международиой научно-практической конференции. Нижный Новгород: Нижегорадская Духовная Семинария. [The Church and problems of contemporary communication. A collection of proceedings of a scientific-didactic conference]. Nizhnyy Novgorod: Nizhegoradskaya Dukhovnaya Seminariya.Search in Google Scholar