Abstract
The present paper proposes to establish (§ 1) the data that can be drawn securely from a controversial testimonium on an oration of Cato (Cato, orat. 99 Sblend.) contained in a late antique panegyric (Pan. Lat. 8 (5).13.3), and to illustrate (§ 2) some of its textual and exegetical problems. Further, in the light of a hitherto overlooked comparison with a gloss of Festus, proposals are made: (§ 3) for a new constitutio and interpretation of the text of the panegyric; and (§ 4) for the identification of a textual citation (which will emerge also as a new fragment) from the orations of Cato the Censor, and the identification with Cato of the anonymous antiqui to whom Festus attributes the use (until now not attested elsewhere) of the rare substantive oliueta in feminine singular with the sense of ‘gathering of olives’. Finally (§ 5) some considerations are offered on the possible sources used by Festus (hypothesising as intermediary the De obscuris Catonis of Verrius, which could in turn have drawn its note on the oliueta from the very passage of Cato attested by the panegyric) and by the panegyrist (for whom a direct knowledge of the speech of Cato is proposed).
Ringraziamenti
Agli anonimi referees della rivista, a Lucia Galli e a Laura Marchisio devo preziose correzioni e utilissimi spunti di riflessione.
Bibliografia
Marco Porcio Catone, Opere, 2 voll., a cura di P. Cugusi/M. T. Sblendorio Cugusi, Torino 2001.Search in Google Scholar
M. Catonis Praeter librum de re rustica quae extant, ed. H. Jordan, Leipzig 1860 (ed. ster. 1967).Search in Google Scholar
M. Porci Catonis Orationum reliquiae, intr., testo critico e commento filologico a cura di M. T. Sblendorio Cugusi, Torino 1982.Search in Google Scholar
S. P. Festi De uerborum significatione quae supersunt, cum Pauli epitome, ed. W. M. Lindsay, Leipzig 1913.Search in Google Scholar
Sexti Pompei Festi De uerborum significatione quae supersunt cum Pauli epitome, em. et annot. a C. O. Müller, Leipzig 1839.Search in Google Scholar
Aulo Gellio, Le notti attiche, a cura di G. Bernardi Perini, Torino 1992.Search in Google Scholar
Oratorum Romanorum fragmenta, ed. H. Malcovati, Torino 41976.Search in Google Scholar
Oratorum Romanorum reliquiae, ed. H. Meyer, Zürich 21842.Search in Google Scholar
XII Panegyrici latini, post Ae. Baehrens iterum rec. G. Baehrens, Lipsiae 1911.Search in Google Scholar
Panégyriques Latins, texte établi et traduit par. E. Galletier, 3 voll., Paris 1949–1955 (v. II: 1952).Search in Google Scholar
XII Panegyrici veteres, ad antiquam, qua editionem qua scripturam, infinitis locis emendati aucti, nuper quidem ope I. Livineii, nunc vero opera I. Gruteri; praeter quorum notas accedunt etiam coniecturae V. Acidalii et C. Rittershusii, Francofurti 1607.Search in Google Scholar
XII Panegyrici Latini, recognovit D. Lassandro, Torino 1992.Search in Google Scholar
Panegirici latini, a c. di D. Lassandro/G. Micunco, Torino 2000.Search in Google Scholar
Panegyrici Latini, recognovit brevique adn. critica instruxit R. A. B. Mynors, Oxford 1964.Search in Google Scholar
Panegyrici Latini, rec. V. Paladini/P. Fedeli, Romae 1976.Search in Google Scholar
M. Verrii Flacci quae extant. Et Sex. Pompei Festi De uerborum significatione libri XX. Iosephi Scaligeri Iulii Caesaris F. in eosdem libros Castigationes, recognitae et auctae, Paris 1576. Search in Google Scholar
F. Della Corte, Catone Censore. La vita e la fortuna, Firenze 21969.Search in Google Scholar
C. E. V. Nixon/B. Saylor Rodgers, In Praise of Later Roman Emperors. The Panegyrici Latini, Intr., Transl., and Hist. Commentary with the Latin Text of R. A. B. Mynors, Berkeley/Los Angeles/Oxford 1994.10.1525/9780520342828Search in Google Scholar
B. Reay, “Agriculture, Writing, and Cato’s Aristocratic Self-Fashioning”, ClAnt 24, 2005, 331–361.10.1525/ca.2005.24.2.331Search in Google Scholar
A. Russo, “Appunti sulla sopravvivenza della letteratura latina arcaica in epoca tardoantica: il caso dell’Euhemerus di Ennio”, Pan 6 n.s., 2017, 5–21. Search in Google Scholar
R. Stark, “Catos Rede de lustri sui felicitate”, RhM 96, 1953, 184–187. Search in Google Scholar
© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelseiten
- Aufsätze
- Zur Beschreibung des Alkinoos-Palasts (Od. 7,84‒132)
- Aretalogical Poetry: A Forgotten Genre of Greek Literature
- Denn dies ist mir viel wert, Kriton ...
- The Table of Ptolemy’s Terms (Tetr. 1.21)
- Der medizinische Unterricht der Iatrosophisten in der ‚Schule von Alexandria‘ (5.‒7. Jh. n. Chr.): Überlegungen zu seiner Organisation, seinen Inhalten und seinen Ursprüngen (zweiter Teil)
- Storia e fortuna di una similitudine nazianzenica: οἷόν τι πέλαγος οὐσίας ἄπειρον καὶ ἀόριστον
- I legati di Mileto e la pubblicazione delle Verrine: nota a Cicerone Verr. 2.1.90
- Deliberat Nero: una declamazione ‘nascosta’ in Suet. Ner. 47.2
- Una parola ritrovata: l’oliueta di Catone
- Miszellen
- Xenophon, De Vectigalibus 4,40
- Heracles on the Pyre and His Insatiable Belly
- Aristarchus on the Difference between ἄγω and φέρω in Homer
- Fünf Bemerkungen zum Text des Diogenes Laertios
- Horace, Epistles 2.1.31: A Textual Note
- Tiberianus 1.15: Emendation and the Pervigilium Veneris
- The Grammarian Pompeius on cateia: a Persian or a Gallic Weapon?
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelseiten
- Aufsätze
- Zur Beschreibung des Alkinoos-Palasts (Od. 7,84‒132)
- Aretalogical Poetry: A Forgotten Genre of Greek Literature
- Denn dies ist mir viel wert, Kriton ...
- The Table of Ptolemy’s Terms (Tetr. 1.21)
- Der medizinische Unterricht der Iatrosophisten in der ‚Schule von Alexandria‘ (5.‒7. Jh. n. Chr.): Überlegungen zu seiner Organisation, seinen Inhalten und seinen Ursprüngen (zweiter Teil)
- Storia e fortuna di una similitudine nazianzenica: οἷόν τι πέλαγος οὐσίας ἄπειρον καὶ ἀόριστον
- I legati di Mileto e la pubblicazione delle Verrine: nota a Cicerone Verr. 2.1.90
- Deliberat Nero: una declamazione ‘nascosta’ in Suet. Ner. 47.2
- Una parola ritrovata: l’oliueta di Catone
- Miszellen
- Xenophon, De Vectigalibus 4,40
- Heracles on the Pyre and His Insatiable Belly
- Aristarchus on the Difference between ἄγω and φέρω in Homer
- Fünf Bemerkungen zum Text des Diogenes Laertios
- Horace, Epistles 2.1.31: A Textual Note
- Tiberianus 1.15: Emendation and the Pervigilium Veneris
- The Grammarian Pompeius on cateia: a Persian or a Gallic Weapon?