Home The influence of process parameters of screen-printed invasive plant paper electrodes on cyclic voltammetry
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The influence of process parameters of screen-printed invasive plant paper electrodes on cyclic voltammetry

  • Urška Kavčič EMAIL logo and Igor Karlovits
Published/Copyright: February 1, 2020
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Using disposable screen-printed electrodes is a convenient way of monitoring environmental pollution, production process control etc. Usually, commercially available screen-printed electrodes are used, but more and more studies are being carried out in the field of printing electrodes on thinner, low-cost and versatile substrates, including paper. In the present research, the comparison of screen-printed electrodes printed on different paper-based materials is presented. Two unique and innovative invasive plant-based papers made from (1) Japanese knotweed, (2) Canadian and Giant goldenrod and (3) commercially available cardboard were used as a printing material for the electrodes. The selected paper substrates were characterized, and screen-printed electrodes were printed. The influence of substrates’ properties and pre- or post-treatment of the screen-printed electrodes on the electrochemical behaviour is thoroughly analyzed. The results indicate that the printing substrate (roughness) had the most significant influence on the cyclic voltammetry response. Comparing pre- and post-treatment of screen-printed electrodes, it was shown that grinding influenced the electrochemical activity significantly, while corona discharge does not have as significant influence. Besides, it was shown that the invasive plant-based papers are viable alternatives to commercially available papers and can be used as low-cost and eco-friendly alternatives for disposable screen-printed electrodes.

Award Identifier / Grant number: J2-8182

Funding statement: Slovenian Research Agency is gratefully acknowledged for funding via J2-8182.

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to thank Špela Trafela, Anja Drame and dr. Kristina Žužek Rožman, Jožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia for their support and assistance.

  1. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

BASi (2018) Cyclic Voltammetry – Data Analysis. Available from https://www.basinc.com/manuals/EC_epsilon/Techniques/CycVolt/cv_analysis.Search in Google Scholar

Bollström, R. Paper for printed electronics and functionality. Department of Chemical Engineering. Åbo Akademi University, Finland, 2013. p. 100.Search in Google Scholar

Cinti, S., et al. (2018) Low-cost and reagent-free paper-based device to detect chloride ions in serum and sweat. Talanta 179:186–192.10.1016/j.talanta.2017.10.030Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Cinti, S., et al. (2017) Carbon Black-Modified Electrodes Screen-Printed onto Paper Towel, Waxed Paper and Parafilm M(®). Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 17(10):2267.10.3390/s17102267Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Cumba, L. R., et al. (2016) Can the mechanical activation (polishing) of screen-printed electrodes enhance their electroanalytical response? Analyst 141(9):2791–2799.10.1039/C6AN00167JSearch in Google Scholar

Desmet, C., et al. (2016) Paper electrodes for bioelectrochemistry: Biosensors and biofuel cells. Biosens. Bioelectron. 76:145–163.10.1016/j.bios.2015.06.052Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Du, C. X., et al. (2016) A novel procedure for fabricating flexible screen-printed electrodes with improved electrochemical performance. IOP Conf. Ser., Mater. Sci. Eng. 137(1):012060.10.1088/1757-899X/137/1/012060Search in Google Scholar

Ebnesajjad, S. (2014) Theories of Adhesion. In: Surface Treatment of Materials for Adhesive Bonding. William Andrew Publishing. pp. 77–91.10.1016/B978-0-323-26435-8.00005-8Search in Google Scholar

Eisby, J., Eisby, F. Corona treatment, Vetaphone. Available from http://www.vetaphone.com/UserFiles/File/pdf/Technical%20feature%20-%20Corona%20Treatment.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Enomae, T., Onabe, F. (1997) Characteristics of Parker Print-Surf Roughness as Compared with Bekk Smoothness. Sen’i Gakkaishi 53(3):86–95.10.2115/fiber.53.86Search in Google Scholar

Fletcher, S. (2016) Screen-Printed Carbon Electrodes. In: Electrochemistry of Carbon Electrodes, Eds. Alkire, R. C., Bartlett, P. N., Lipkowski, J., pp. 425–444.10.1002/9783527697489.ch12Search in Google Scholar

Garcia, D. E., et al. (2010) A Parametric Design Study of an Electrochemical Sensor. J. Assoc. Lab. Autom. 15(3):179–188.10.1117/12.825902Search in Google Scholar

Gusmão, R., et al. (2017) Screen-printed carbon electrodes doped with TiO2-Au nanocomposites with improved electrocatalytic performance. Mater. Today Commun. 11:11–17.10.1016/j.mtcomm.2017.02.003Search in Google Scholar

Hayat, A., Marty, J. L. (2014) Disposable Screen Printed Electrochemical Sensors: Tools for Environmental Monitoring. Sensors 14(6):10432–10453.10.3390/s140610432Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Ihalainen, P., et al. (2012) Influence of Surface Properties of Coated Papers on Printed Electronics. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 51(17):6025–6036.10.1021/ie202807vSearch in Google Scholar

Jewell, E., et al. (2016) Improved Manufacturing Performance of Screen Printed Carbon Electrodes through Material Formulation. Biosensors 6(3):30.10.3390/bios6030030Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Kavčič, U., Pleša, T. (2018) The influence of printing properties of screen printed electrodes on sensitivity measured with cyclic voltammetry. In: 9th International Symposium on Graphic Engineering and Design University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Department of Graphic Engineering and Design, Novi Sad, Serbia. pp. 253–259.10.24867/GRID-2018-p31Search in Google Scholar

Li, M., et al. (2012) Recent developments and applications of screen-printed electrodes in environmental assays—A review. Anal. Chim. Acta 734:31–44.10.1016/j.aca.2012.05.018Search in Google Scholar PubMed

López-López, L., et al. (2017) Disposable electrochemical aptasensor for gluten determination in food. Sens. Actuators B, Chem. 241:522–527.10.1016/j.snb.2016.10.112Search in Google Scholar

Määttänen, A., et al. (2013) A low-cost paper-based inkjet-printed platform for electrochemical analyses. Sens. Actuators B, Chem. 177:153–162.10.1016/j.snb.2012.10.113Search in Google Scholar

Medina Rodríguez, B. Inkjet and screen printing for electronic applications. Universitat de Barcelona, Departament d’Enginyeries: Secció d’Electrònica. p. 225. 2016.Search in Google Scholar

Menart, E., et al. (2017) Novel hydrazinium polyacrylate-based electrochemical gas sensor for formaldehyde. Sens. Actuators B, Chem. 238:71–75.10.1016/j.snb.2016.07.042Search in Google Scholar

Mohamed, H. M. (2016) Screen-printed disposable electrodes: Pharmaceutical applications and recent developments. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 82:1–11.10.1016/j.trac.2016.02.010Search in Google Scholar

Morrin, A., et al. (2003) Electrochemical Characterization of Commercial and Home-Made Screen-Printed Carbon Electrodes. Anal. Lett. 36(9):2021–2039.10.1081/AL-120023627Search in Google Scholar

Prasek, J., et al. (2012) Optimization of planar three-electrode systems for redox system detection. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 7(3):1785–1801.10.1016/S1452-3981(23)13840-5Search in Google Scholar

Wei, H., et al. (2007) Enhanced electrochemical performance at screen-printed carbon electrodes by a new pretreating procedure. Anal. Chim. Acta 588(2):297–303.10.1016/j.aca.2007.02.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Zhao, C., et al. (2013) A microfluidic paper-based electrochemical biosensor array for multiplexed detection of metabolic biomarkers. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 14(5):054402.10.1088/1468-6996/14/5/054402Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2019-08-19
Accepted: 2019-12-31
Published Online: 2020-02-01
Published in Print: 2020-06-25

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 29.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/npprj-2019-0070/html
Scroll to top button