Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
Some arguments for higher nodes in syntax: a reply to Hudson’s ‘Constituency and dependency’
-
ÖSTEN DAHL
Published/Copyright:
November 20, 2009
Published Online: 2009-11-20
Published in Print: 1980
Walter de Gruyter
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelei
- Sonstiges
- Clitic promotion and mood in Spanish verbal complements
- Some arguments for higher nodes in syntax: a reply to Hudson’s ‘Constituency and dependency’
- A second attack on constituency: a reply to Dahl
- Dyirbal ergativity: counter-rejoinder to Dixon
- Arabic loan phonology: the assimilation of English lexical items
- Book review
- Short reviews
- Notices
Articles in the same Issue
- Titelei
- Sonstiges
- Clitic promotion and mood in Spanish verbal complements
- Some arguments for higher nodes in syntax: a reply to Hudson’s ‘Constituency and dependency’
- A second attack on constituency: a reply to Dahl
- Dyirbal ergativity: counter-rejoinder to Dixon
- Arabic loan phonology: the assimilation of English lexical items
- Book review
- Short reviews
- Notices
