Home Deriving classifier word order typology, or Greenberg’s Universal 20A and Universal 20
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Deriving classifier word order typology, or Greenberg’s Universal 20A and Universal 20

  • One-Soon Her EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: February 28, 2017

Abstract

The word order typology of numerals (Num), classifier or measure word (C/M), and noun (N) put forth by Greenberg (1990 [1972], Numerical classifiers and substantival number: Problems in the genesis of a linguistic type. In Keith Denning & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), On language: Selected writings of Joseph H. Greenberg, 166–193. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press) can be reduced to a universal principle: N does not come between Num and C/M. Given the affinity between this universal and Greenberg’s Universal 20, which concerns the word order typology of D, Num, A, and N, the former is dubbed “Universal 20A” (Her et al. 2015). This paper first discusses, and ultimately rejects, the two alleged exceptions to Universal 20A, one in Ejagham, the other in some Tai-Kadai and Tibeto-Burman languages. Then, in light of Universal 20A, Cinque’s (2005, Deriving Greenberg’s Universal 20 and its exceptions. Linguistic Inquiry 36(3). 315–332) successful antisymmetric account of Universal 20 and all its exceptions is re-examined and shown to be inadequate for Universal 20A. The analysis I propose adopts Abels and Neeleman’s (2012, Linear asymmetries and the LCA. Syntax 15(1). 25–74) symmetric derivational account of Universal 20 and, crucially, takes complex numerals into consideration. The final account also integrates a multiplicative theory of C/M (Her 2012a, Distinguishing classifiers and measure words: A mathematical perspective and implications. Lingua 122(14). 1668–1691) and is able to explain the base-C/M harmonization, which was first discovered by Greenberg (1990 [1978]: 292, Generalizations about numeral systems. In Keith Denning & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), On language: Selected writings of Joseph H. Greenberg, 271–309. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press) but has since been overlooked in classifier research, and also offer a functional explanation for Universal 20A.

Acknowledgments

I am sincerely grateful to the editors of this special issue of Linguistics, Walter Bisang and Yicheng Wu, and the two anonymous reviewers for their careful and insightful comments, which led to significant improvements of the paper. I also benefitted greatly from discussions with Hui-Chin Tsai on the formal issues dealt with in the paper. However, all remaining errors are my own. I also gratefully acknowledge that the research reported in the paper was largely funded by the following grants by the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) of Taiwan: 101-2410-H-004-184-MY3, 103-2633-H-004-001, 104-2410-H-004-164-MY3, and 104-2633-H-004-001.

References

Abels, Klaus & Ad Neeleman. 2012. Linear asymmetries and the LCA. Syntax 15(1). 25–74.10.1111/j.1467-9612.2011.00163.xSearch in Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices (Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Au Yeung, Ben Wai Hoo. 2005. An interface program for parameterization of classifiers in Chinese. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong dissertation.10.14711/thesis-b922442Search in Google Scholar

Au Yeung, Ben Wai Hoo. 2007. Multiplication basis of emergence of classifiers. Language and Linguistics 8(4). 835–861.Search in Google Scholar

Bhattacharya, Tanmoy. 1999. The structure of the Bangla DP. London: University College London dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Bhattacharya, Tanmoy. 2001. Numeral/quantifier-classifier as a complex head in semi-lexical heads. In Henk van Riemsdijk & Norbert Corver (eds.), Semi-lexical heads, 191–222. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Borer, Hagit. 2005. Structuring sense, vol. 1: In name only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263905.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Chan, Eugene S.L. 2015. Numeral system of the world’s languages. http://lingweb.eva.mpg.de/numeral/Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Ping. 2003. Indefinite determiner introducing definite referent: A special use of yi ‘one’ + classifier in Chinese. Lingua 113(12). 1169–1184.10.1016/S0024-3841(02)00163-8Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Ping. 2004. Identifiability and definiteness in Chinese. Linguistics 42(6). 1129–1184.10.1515/ling.2004.42.6.1129Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, Lisa L.-S. & Rint Sybesma. 1998. Yi-wan Tang, Yi-ge Tang: Classifiers and massifiers. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies New Series 28(3). 385–412.Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, Lisa L.-S. & Rint Sybesma. 1999. Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry 30(4). 509–542.10.1162/002438999554192Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, Lisa L.-S. & Rint Sybesma. 2005. Classifiers in four varieties of Chinese. In Guglielmo Cinque & Richard S. Kayne (eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative syntax, 259–292. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 2005. Deriving Greenberg’s Universal 20 and its exceptions. Linguistic Inquiry 36(3). 315–332.10.1162/0024389054396917Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 2006. Are all languages ‘numeral classifier languages’? Rivista di grammatica generativa 31. 119–122.Search in Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 2006. Numbers, language, and culture. Paper presented at the Jyvaskyla Summer School, Jyvaskyla, Finland, 24 July–11 August.Search in Google Scholar

Corver, Norbert & Joost Zwarts. 2006. Prepositional numerals. Lingua 116(6). 811–835.10.1016/j.lingua.2005.03.008Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 1994. Semantic universals in classifier systems. Word 45. 145–171.10.1080/00437956.1994.11435922Search in Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 1980. The languages of Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Doetjes, Jenny. 2012. Count/mass distinctions across languages. In Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of naturallanguage meaning, vol. 3, 2559–2580. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Dryer, Mathew S. 2009. The order of demonstrative, numeral, adjective, and noun: An alternative to Cinque. Paper presented at the Conference on Theoretical Approaches to Disharmonic Word Orders, University of Newcastle, 30 May–1 June 2009.Search in Google Scholar

Fukui, Naoki & Yuji Takano. 2000. Nominal structure: An extension of the symmetry principle. In Peter Svenonius (ed.), The derivation of VO and OV, 219–254. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.31.09fukSearch in Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Joseph Greenberg (ed.), Universals of language, 73–113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph. 1990 [1972]. Numerical classifiers and substantival number: Problems in the genesis of a linguistic type. In Keith Denning & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), On language: Selected writings of Joseph H. Greenberg, 166–193. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.10.1515/9781503623217-009Search in Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph. 1975. Dynamic aspects of word order in numeral classifier. In Charles Li (ed.), Word order and word order change, 27–46. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Search in Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph. 1990 [1978]. Generalizations about numeral systems. In Keith Denning & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), On language: Selected writings of Joseph H. Greenberg, 271–309. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.10.1515/9781503623217-014Search in Google Scholar

Gu, Yang & Wu Da. 2005. Cong Jingpoyu han Yiyu de liangci duanyu kan mingci duanyu de zhishe tezheng [Implications of Jingpho and Yi classifier phrase on noun phrase referentiality]. In Jingfang Li & Suhua Hu (eds.), Hanzangyu liangci yanjiu [Studies of classifiers in Sino-Tibetan], 55–89. Beijing: The Central University of Nationalities Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hale, Kenneth L. 1975. Gaps in grammar and culture. In M. Dale Kinkade, Kenneth L. Hale & Oswald Werner (eds.), Linguistics and anthropology: In honor of C.F. Voegelin, 295–315. Lisse: Peter de Ridder Press.Search in Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd. 1997. Cognitive foundations of grammar. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Her, One-Soon. 2012a. Distinguishing classifiers and measure words: A mathematical perspective and implications. Lingua 122(14). 1668–1691.10.1016/j.lingua.2012.08.012Search in Google Scholar

Her, One-Soon. 2012b. Structure of classifiers and measure words: A lexical functional account. Language and Linguistics 13(6). 1211–1251.Search in Google Scholar

Her, One-Soon. 2017. Structure of numerals and numeral classifiers in Chinese: Historical and typological perspectives and cross-linguistic implications. Language and Linguistics 18(1). 26–71.10.1075/lali.18.1.02herSearch in Google Scholar

Her, One-Soon & Chen-Tien Hsieh. 2010. On the semantic distinction between classifiers and measure words. Language and Linguistics 11(3). 527–550.Search in Google Scholar

Her, One-Soon, Hui-Chin Tsai, Kun-Han Lin, Marc Tang & Meng-Chang Lee. 2015. Unification of numeral bases and numeral classifiers: Evidence from SMATTI. Paper presented at the Workshop on the syntax and semantics of numerals, the 48th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea. Leiden University Centre for Linguistics (LUCL), Leiden, 2–5 September.Search in Google Scholar

Hsieh, Miao-Ling. 2008. The internal structure of noun phrases in Chinese. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics (Book Series in Chinese Linguistics 2). Taipei: Crane Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, C.-T. James, Audrey Li & Yafei Li. 2009. The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139166935Search in Google Scholar

Huang, C.-T. James & Masao Ochi. 2011. Classifiers and nominal structure: A parametric approach and its consequences. In Mingle Gao (ed.), Universals and variation: Proceedings of Glow-in-Asia VIII, 191–197. Beijing: Beijing Languages and Culture University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, Zaijun. 1964. Cong jiawen jinwen liangci de yingyong kaocha hanyu liangci de qiyuan yu fazhan [A study of the origin and development of classifiers in Chinese from the perspectives of the use of classifiers in oracle bones and bronze inscriptions]. Zhongguo Yuwen 1964(6). 432–441.Search in Google Scholar

Hurford, James. 1975. The linguistic theory of numerals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hurford, James. 1987. Language and number. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Ionin, Tania & Ora Matushansky. 2006. The composition of complex cardinals. Journal of Semantics 23. 315–360.10.1093/jos/ffl006Search in Google Scholar

Jenks, Peter. 2010. Evidence for the syntactic diversity of numeral classifiers. Poster presented at the 84th Annual Meeting of the Linguistics Society of America, Baltimore, MD, January 7–10, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

Jiang, Ying. 2006. Hanzang yuxi mingliangci yanjiu [A study of nominal classifiers in Sino-Tibetan]. Beijing: The Central University of Nationalities dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Jiang, Renping. 2007. Jishuci he xushuci de leixingxue yanjiu [A typological study of cardinals and ordinals]. Nanchang: Nanchang University MA thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Joseph, Thattil Umbavu Varghese. 2007. Rabha. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressSearch in Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard S. 2006. On parameters and on principles of pronunciation. In Hans Broekhuis, Norbert Corver, Riny Huybregts, Ursula Kleinhenz & Jan Koster (eds.), Organizing grammar: Linguistic studies in honor of Henk van Riemsdijk, 289–299. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110892994.289Search in Google Scholar

Kihm, Alain. 2005. Noun class, gender, and the lexicon-syntax-morphology interfaces: A comparative study of Niger-Congo and Romance languages. In Guglielmo Cinque & Richard Kayne (eds.), Handbook of comparative syntax, 459–512. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kiryu, Kazuyuki. 2009. On the rise of the classifier system in Newar. In Yasuhiko Nagano (ed.), Issues in Tibeto-Burman historical linguistics (Senri Ethnological Studies 75), 51–69. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Charles & Sandra Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Xu-Ping. 2011. On the semantics of classifiers in Chinese. Tel Aviv: Bar-Ilan University dissertation.10.1163/1960602811X00051Search in Google Scholar

Li, Yen-Hui Audrey. 2014. Structure of noun phrases: Left or right? Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 12(2). 1–32.Search in Google Scholar

Lin, Jo-wang. 1997. Noun phrase structure in Mandarin Chinese: DP or NP?. Chinese Language and Linguistics 3. 401–434.Search in Google Scholar

Liu, Hongyong. 2006. The Structure of complex nominals: Classifiers, possessives and relatives. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Muromatsu, Keiko. 1998. On the syntax of classifiers. College Park, MD: University of Maryland dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Paris, Marie-Claude. 1981. Problèmes de syntaxe et de sémantique en linguistique Chinoise. Paris: Collège de France, Institut des Hautes Etudes Chinoises.Search in Google Scholar

Peyraube, Alain. 1998. On the history of classifiers in archaic and medieval Chinese. In Benjamin K. T’sou (ed.) Studia Linguistica Serica, 131–145. Hong Kong: Language Information Sciences Research Centre, City University of Hong Kong.Search in Google Scholar

Saul, Janice E. & Nancy F. Wilson. 1980. Nung Grammar. Summer Institute of Linguistics, University of Texas at Arlington.Search in Google Scholar

Simpson, Andrew. 2005. Classifiers and DP structure in Southeast Asia. In Guglielmo Cinque & Richard Kayne (eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative syntax, 806–838. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tang, Chih-Chen Jane. 1990a. Chinese phrase structure and the extended Xʹ-theory. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Tang, Chih-Chen Jane. 1990b. A note on the DP analysis of Chinese noun phrases. Linguistics 28(2). 337–354.10.1515/ling.1990.28.2.337Search in Google Scholar

Tang, Chih-Chen Jane. 2004. Two types of classifier languages: A typological study of classification markers in Paiwan noun phrases. Language and Linguistics 5(2). 377–407.Search in Google Scholar

Watanabe, Akira. 2006. Functional projections of nominals in Japanese: Syntax of classifiers. Natural Languages and Linguistic Theory 24. 241–306.10.1007/s11049-005-3042-4Search in Google Scholar

Watters, John R. 1981. A phonology and morphology of Ejagham –With notes on dialect variation. Los Angeles: CA: University of California Los Angeles dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Hong. 2007. Numeral classifiers in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 16(1). 43–59.10.1007/s10831-006-9006-9Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Jingni. 2005. Maonanyu de liangci duanyu [The classifier phrase in Maonan]. In Jingfang Li & Suhua Hu (eds.), Hanzangyu linagci Yanjiu [Studies of classifiers in Sino-Tibetan], 296–308. Beijing: The Central University of Nationalities Press.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Niina Ning. 2009. Syntactic properties of numeral classifiers in Mandarin Chinese. Paper delivered on, at the Graduate Institute of Linguistics, National Chung Cheng University, April 10. http://www.ccunix.ccu.edu.tw/~lngnz/index.files/May%202009.pdf(Accessed 1 December, 2009).Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Niina Ning. 2011. The constituency of classifier constructions in Mandarin Chinese. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 9(1). 1–50.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Niina Ning. 2013. Classifier structures in Mandarin Chinese. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110304992Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-2-28
Published in Print: 2017-3-1

©2017 by De Gruyter Mouton

Downloaded on 1.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ling-2016-0044/html
Scroll to top button