“Trolling is not stupid”: Internet trolling as the art of deception serving entertainment

References

Adler, Jonathan. 1997. Lying, deceiving, or falsely implicating. Journal of Philosophy 94. 435–452.10.2307/2564617Search in Google Scholar

Baker, Paul. 2001. Moral panic and alternative identity construction in Usenet. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 7(1). doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2001.tb00136.xSearch in Google Scholar

Beyer, Jessica. 2014. The emergence of a freedom of information movement: Anonymous, WikiLeaks, the Pirate Party, and Iceland. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19. 141–154. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12050Search in Google Scholar

Binns, Amy. 2012. Don’t feed the trolls! Managing troublemakers in magazines’ online communities. Journalism Practice 6. 547–562.10.1080/17512786.2011.648988Search in Google Scholar

Bishop, Jonathan. 2012a. The art of trolling: Transgressive representations of Internet trollers by mass media organisations in meta-communicative contexts. Swansea, GB: The Crocels Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bishop, Jonathan. 2012b. The psychology of trolling and lurking: the role of defriending and gamification for increasing participation in online communities using seductive narratives. In H. Li (ed.), Virtual community participation and motivation: Cross-disciplinary theories. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-4666-0312-7.ch010Search in Google Scholar

Bishop, Jonathan. 2012c. Scope and limitations in the Government of Wales Act 2006 for tackling internet abuses in the form of ‘flame trolling’. Statute Law Review 33. 207–216.10.1093/slr/hms016Search in Google Scholar

Bishop, Jonathan. 2014a. Representations of ‘trolls’ in mass media communication: a review of media-texts and moral panics relating to ‘internet trolling’. International Journal of Web Based Communities 10. 7–24.10.1504/IJWBC.2014.058384Search in Google Scholar

Bishop, Jonathan. 2014b. Trolling for the lulz? Using media theory to understand transgressive humour and other Internet trolling in online communities. In Jonathan Bishop (ed.), Transforming politics and policy in the digital age, 155–172. Hershey: IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-4666-6038-0.ch011Search in Google Scholar

Bok, Sissela. 1978. Lying: Moral choice in public and private life. NY: Random House.10.2307/1288137Search in Google Scholar

Buckels, Erin, Paul Trapnell, and Delroy Paulhus. 2014. Trolls just want to have fun. Personality and Individual Differences 67. 97–102.10.1037/e520722015-006Search in Google Scholar

Burgess, J., and Green, J. 2008. Agency and controversy in the YouTube community. Proceedings IR 9.0: Rethinking communities, rethinking place Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR) Conference. Denmark: IT University of Copenhagen. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/15383/1/15383.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Carson, Thomas. 2006. The definition of lying. Noûs 40. 284–306.10.1111/j.0029-4624.2006.00610.xSearch in Google Scholar

Carson, Thomas. 2010. Lying and deception: Theory and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199577415.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Castelfranchi, Cristino and Isabella Poggi. 1994. Lying as pretending to give information. In Herman Parret (ed.), Pretending to communicate, 276–291. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Chisholm, Roderick and Thomas Feehan. 1977. The intent to deceive. The Journal of Philosophy 74. 143–159.10.2307/2025605Search in Google Scholar

Chovanec, Jan and Marta Dynel. 2015. Researching interactional forms and participant structures in public and social media. In Marta Dynel & Jan Chovanec (eds.), Participation in public and social media interactions, 1–23. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.256.01choSearch in Google Scholar

Chovanec, Jan. 2015. Participant roles and embedded interactions in online sports broadcasts. In Marta Dynel & Jan Chovanec (eds.), Participation in public and social media interactions, 67–95. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.256.04choSearch in Google Scholar

Crystal, David. 2001. Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139164771Search in Google Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan. 2005. Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: The Weakest Link. Journal of Politeness Research 1. 35–72.10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35Search in Google Scholar

Dahlberg, Lincoln. 2001. Computer–mediated communication and the public sphere: A critical analysis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 7(1). doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2001.tb00137.xSearch in Google Scholar

Donath, Judith. 1999. Identity and deception in the virtual community. In Marc Smith & Peter Kollock (eds.), Communities in cyberspace, 29–59. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Dynel, Marta. 2011a. ‘You talking to me?’ The viewer as a ratified listener to film discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 43. 1628–1644.10.1016/j.pragma.2010.11.016Search in Google Scholar

Dynel, Marta. 2011b. A web of deceit: A neo-Gricean view on types of verbal deception. International Review of Pragmatics 3. 137–165.10.1163/187731011X597497Search in Google Scholar

Dynel, Marta. 2012. Setting our House in order: The workings of impoliteness in multi-party film discourse. Journal of Politeness Research 8. 161–194.10.1515/pr-2012-0010Search in Google Scholar

Dynel, Marta. 2013. Impoliteness as disaffiliative humour in film talk. In Marta Dynel (ed.), Developments in linguistic humour theory, 105–144. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/thr.1.07dynSearch in Google Scholar

Dynel, Marta. 2014. Participation framework underlying YouTube interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 73. 37–52.10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.001Search in Google Scholar

Dynel, Marta. 2016 forthcoming a. Killing two birds with one deceit: Deception in multi-party interactions. International Review of Pragmatics 8.10.1163/18773109-00802002Search in Google Scholar

Dynel, Marta2016 forthcoming b On untruthfulness, its adversaries and strange bedfellows. Pragmatics & Cognition10.1075/pc.23.1.01dynSearch in Google Scholar

Dynel, Marta. 2017 forthcoming a. Lying and humor. Jörg Meibauer (ed.), Oxford handbook of lying. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736578.013.25Search in Google Scholar

Dynel, Marta. 2017 forthcoming b. No child’s play: A philosophical pragmatic view of overt pretence as a vehicle for conversational humor. In Villy Tsakona and Jan Chovanec (eds.), Creating and negotiating humor in everyday interactions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/thr.7.09dynSearch in Google Scholar

Eelen, Gino. 2001. A critique of politeness theories. Manchester: St Jerome Publishing. encyclopediadramatica.se/Troll.Search in Google Scholar

Fallis, Don. 2009. What is lying? The Journal of Philosophy 106. 29–56.10.5840/jphil200910612Search in Google Scholar

Fallis, Don. 2010. Lying and deception. Philosophers’ Imprint 10. 1–22.Search in Google Scholar

Fallis, Don. forthcoming. Frankfurt wasn’t bullshitting! Southwest Philosophical Studies.Search in Google Scholar

Faulkner, Paul. 2007. What is wrong with lying? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75. 524–547.10.1111/j.1933-1592.2007.00092.xSearch in Google Scholar

Ferguson, Mark and Thomas Ford. 2008. Disparagement humour: A theoretical and empirical review of psychoanalytic, superiority, and social identity theories. Humour 21. 283–312.Search in Google Scholar

Frankfurt, Harry. 2005 [1986]. On bullshit. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400826537Search in Google Scholar

Fuller, Jason, Christian McCrea, and Glen Wilson. 2013. Troll theory? FibreCulture Journal, “Trolls and The Negative Space of the Internet” 22.Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gruner, Charles. 1997. The game of humor: A comprehensive theory of why we laugh. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Gully, Adrian. 2012. It’s only a flaming game: A case study of Arabic computer-mediated communication. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 39(1). 1–18.10.1080/13530194.2012.659440Search in Google Scholar

Hancock, Jeffrey. 2007. Digital deception. Why, when and how people lie online. In Adam Joinson, Katelyn McKenna, Tom Postmes & Ulf-Dietrich Reips (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Internet psychology, 289–30. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hancock, Jeffrey, Catalina Toma and Nicole Ellison. 2007. The truth about lying in online dating profiles. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2007), 449–452. New York: Associate for Computing Machinery.10.1145/1240624.1240697Search in Google Scholar

Hardaker, Claire. 2010. Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: from user discussions to theoretical concepts. Journal of Politeness Research 6. 215–242.10.1515/jplr.2010.011Search in Google Scholar

Hardaker, Claire. 2013. “Uh. . . . not to be nitpicky… but… the past tense of drag is dragged, not drug.” An overview of trolling strategies. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 1. 58–86.10.1075/jlac.1.1.04harSearch in Google Scholar

Haugh, M. 2012. Epilogue: The first-order distinction in face and politeness research. Journal of Politeness Research 8(1). 111–13410.1515/pr-2012-0007Search in Google Scholar

Herring, Susan. 1999. The rhetorical dynamics of gender harassment on-line. The Information Society 15. 151–167.10.1080/019722499128466Search in Google Scholar

Herring, Susan, Kirk Job-Sluder, Rebecca Scheckler, and Sasha Barab. 2002. Searching for safety online: Managing “Trolling” in a feminist forum. The Information Society 18. 371–384.10.1080/01972240290108186Search in Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. 1996 [1651]. Leviathan. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, Norman, Randolph Cooper, and Wynne Chin. 2008. The effect of flaming on computer-mediated negotiations. European Journal of Information Systems 17. 417–434.10.1057/ejis.2008.22Search in Google Scholar

Kupfer, Joseph. 1982. The moral presumption against lying. Review of Metaphysics 36. 103–26.Search in Google Scholar

LaFave, Lawrence. 1972. Humour judgments as a function of reference groups and identification classes. In Jerry Goldstein & Paul McGhee (eds.), The psychology of humour, 195–210. New York: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-288950-9.50016-XSearch in Google Scholar

La Fave, Lawrence, Jay Haddad and William Maesen. 1976. Superiority, enhanced self-esteem, and perceived incongruity humor theory. In Anthony Chapman & Henry Foot (eds.), Humor and laughter: Theory, research and applications, 63–91. New York: Wiley and Sons.10.4324/9780203789469-5Search in Google Scholar

Mahon, James. 2007. A definition of deceiving. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 21. 181–194.10.5840/ijap20072124Search in Google Scholar

Mahon, James. 2008. Two definitions of lying. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22. 211–230.10.5840/ijap200822216Search in Google Scholar

Mahon, James. 2015. The definition of lying and deception. In E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 edn). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/lying-definition/.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Rod, Patricia Puhlik-Doris, Gwen Larsen, Jeanette Gray and Kelly Weir. 2003. Individual differences in uses of humour and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the humour Styles Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality 37. 48–75.10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00534-2Search in Google Scholar

McCosker, Anthony. 2014. Trolling as provocation: YouTube’s agonistic publics. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 20(2). 201–217.10.1177/1354856513501413Search in Google Scholar

Meibauer, Jörg. 2016 forthcoming. Aspects of a theory of bullshit. Pragmatics & Cognition.10.1075/pc.23.1.04meiSearch in Google Scholar

O’Sullivan, Patrick & Andrew Flanagin. 2003. Reconceptualizing “flaming” and other problematic messages. New Media and Society 5. 69–94.10.1177/1461444803005001908Search in Google Scholar

Phillips, Whitney. 2015. This is why we can’t have nice things: Mapping the relationship between online trolling and mainstream culture. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/10288.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Saul, Jennifer. 2012. Lying, misleading, and the role of what is said. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199603688.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Shachaf, Pnina and Noriko Hara. 2010. Beyond vandalism: Wikipedia trolls. Journal of Information Science 36(3). 357–370.10.1177/0165551510365390Search in Google Scholar

Simpson, David. 1992. Lying, liars and language. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52. 623–639.10.2307/2108211Search in Google Scholar

Sorensen, Roy. 2007. Bald-faced lies! Lying without the intent to deceive. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88/2. 251–264.10.1111/j.1468-0114.2007.00290.xSearch in Google Scholar

Stokke, Andreas. 2013. Lying and asserting. Journal of Philosophy 110. 33–60.10.5840/jphil2013110144Search in Google Scholar

Tepper, Michele. 1997. Usenet Communities and the cultural politics of information. In David Porter (ed.), Internet culture, 39–54. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203948873-3Search in Google Scholar

Turner, Tammara Combs, Mark Smith, Danyel Fisher, and Howard Welser. 2005. Picturing Usenet: Mapping computer-mediated collective action. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00270.xSearch in Google Scholar

Utz, Sonja. 2005. Types of deception and underlying motivation: What people think. Social Science Computer Review 23. 49–56.10.1177/0894439304271534Search in Google Scholar

Vincent Marrelli, Jocelyne. 2003. Truthfulness. In Jef Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman, Jan Blommaert & Chris Bulcaen (eds.), Handbook of pragmatics, 1–48. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Vincent Marrelli, Jocelyne. 2004. Words in the way of truth. Truthfulness, deception, lying across cultures and disciplines. Napoli: Edizione Scientifiche Italiane.Search in Google Scholar

Vincent, Jocelyne & Cristino Castelfranchi. 1981. How to lie while saying the truth. In Herman Parret, Marina Sbisà & Jef Verschueren (eds.), Possibilities and limitations of pragmatics: Proceedings of the Conference on Pragmatics, Urbino, July 8–14, 1979, 749–777. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.7.39vinSearch in Google Scholar

Watts, Richard, Sachiko Ide & Konrad Ehlich. 1992. Introduction. In R. Watts, S. Ide & K. Ehlich (eds.), Politeness in language: study in its history, theory and practice, 1–17. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110886542Search in Google Scholar

Whitty, Monica. 2002. Liar, liar! An examination of how open, supportive and honest people are in chat rooms. Computers in Human Behavior 18. 343–352.10.1016/S0747-5632(01)00059-0Search in Google Scholar

Whitty, Monica & Adam Joinson. 2008. Truth, trust and lies on the Internet. London and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203938942Search in Google Scholar

Williams, Bernard. 2002. Truth and truthfulness: An essay in genealogy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Zillmann, Dolf, & Joanne Cantor. 1972. Directionality of transitory dominance as a communication variable affecting humor appreciation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 24. 191–198.10.1037/h0033384Search in Google Scholar