Home “Bare” or “Gloved” Hands: A Study on the Production of Safe Food
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

“Bare” or “Gloved” Hands: A Study on the Production of Safe Food

  • Ana Paula Dutra Resem Brizio EMAIL logo and Carlos Prentice
Published/Copyright: November 18, 2014

Abstract

There is no documented evidence proving that the meat products produced by “gloved” hands are safer than those produced by “bare” hands. Thus, this paper proposes to conduct a microbiological investigation to assess cross-contamination between handlers and poultry products in three distinct processing situations: without the use of gloves (bare hands), with the use of reusable gloves and using disposable gloves. The microbiological results showed that the use of hands protected by disposable gloves was significantly better (p < 0.05) compared to the use of bare hands and hands containing reusable gloves. Thus, the adoption of disposable gloves combined with good manufacturing practices training seems to be the most reliable alternative to reduce handler–food contamination during the preparation of poultry products.

References

1. LuesJF, TonderIV. The occurrence of indicator bacteria on hands and aprons of food handlers in the delicatessen sections of a retail group. Food Control2007;18:32632.10.1016/j.foodcont.2005.10.010Search in Google Scholar

2. BalzarettiCM, MarzanoMA. Prevention of travel-related foodborne diseases: microbiological risk assessment of food handlers and ready-to-eat foods in northern Italy airport restaurants. Food Control2013;29:2027.10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.05.077Search in Google Scholar

3. TanSL, BakarFA, MuhammadSA, LeeHY, MahyudinNA. Hand hygiene knowledge, attitudes and practices among food handlers at primary schools in Hulu Langat district, Selangor (Malaysia). Food Control2013;34:42835.10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.04.045Search in Google Scholar

4. AycicekH, AydoganH, KucukkaraaslanA, BaysallarM, BasustaogluAC. Assessment of the bacterial contamination on hands of hospital food handlers. Food Control2004;15:2539.10.1016/S0956-7135(03)00064-1Search in Google Scholar

5. ShojaeiH, ShooshtaripoorJ, AmiriM. Efficacy of simple hand-washing in reduction of microbial hand contamination of Iranian foods handlers. Food Res Int2006;39:5259.10.1016/j.foodres.2005.10.007Search in Google Scholar

6. Brasil. Ministério da saúde. Resolução RDC nº275, de 21 de outubro de 2002. Aprova o regulamento técnico de procedimentos operacionais padronizados aplicados aos estabelecimentos produtores/industrializadores de alimentos e a lista de verificação das boas práticas de fabricação em estabelecimentos produtores/industrializadores de alimentos. Diário Oficial [da] República Federativa do Brasil. Brasília, DF, 23 de outubro de 2003. Seção I, 2003:3649.Search in Google Scholar

7. ASGAVAssociação gaúcha de avicultura. Relatório anual 2013. Available at: http://www.asgav.com.br/noticias_detalhe.php?id=1611. Accessed: 21 Aug 2014.Search in Google Scholar

8. UBABEF. União brasileira de avicultura. Relatório anual 2013. Available at: http://www.abef.com.br/ubabef/publicacoes_relatoriosanuais.php. Accessed: 21 Aug 2014.Search in Google Scholar

9. CarvalhoCO, SerafiniAB. Grupos de microrganismos isolados da orofaringe, nasofaringe e das mãos dos trabalhadores do restaurante da universidade federal de goiás. Higiene Alimentar1996;10:1924.Search in Google Scholar

10. Brasil. Ministério da saúde. Resolução RDC nº12, de 02 de janeiro de 2001. Aprova o regulamento técnico sobre padrões microbiológicos para alimentos. Diário Oficial [da] República Federativa do Brasil. Brasília, DF, 10 de janeiro de 2001. Seção I, 2001:4653.Search in Google Scholar

11. JayM. Microbiologia de alimentos, 6th ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

12. Brasil. Ministério da agricultura, pecuária e abastecimento. Instrução normativa nº62, de 26 de agosto de 2003. Aprova os métodos analíticos oficiais para análises microbiológicas para o controle de produtos de origem animal e água. Diário oficial [da] república federativa do brasil. Brasília, DF, 18 de setembro 2003. Seção I, 2003:21–32;40–3;51–67.Search in Google Scholar

13. APHA. American Public Health Association. Compendium of methods for the microbiological examination of foods. Washington, DC, 2001:676.Search in Google Scholar

14. CrisleyFD, FoterMJ. The use of antimicrobial soaps and detergents for hand washing in foodservice establishments. J Milk Food Technol1975;28:27884.10.4315/0022-2747-28.9.278Search in Google Scholar

15. MontvilleR, ChenY, SchaffnerDW. Glove barriers to bacterial cross-contamination between hands to food. J Food Prot2001;64:8459.10.4315/0362-028X-64.6.845Search in Google Scholar

16. BeanNH, GouldingJS, DanielsMT, AnguloFJ. Surveillance for foodborne disease outbreaks – United States. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep1997;45:167.Search in Google Scholar

17. AndradeNJ, MacedoJA. Higienização na indústria de alimentos. São Paulo: Varela, 1996.Search in Google Scholar

18. MooreG, GriffithC. A comparison of surface sampling methods for detecting coliforms on food contact surfaces. Food Microbiol2002;19:6573.10.1006/fmic.2001.0464Search in Google Scholar

19. AndradeNJ. Higiene na indústria de alimentos: avaliação e controle da adesão e formação de biofilmes bacterianos. São Paulo: Varela, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

20. MartinsRB, HoggT, OteroJG. Food handlers’ knowledge on food hygiene: the case of a catering company in Portugal. Food Control2012;23:18490.10.1016/j.foodcont.2011.07.008Search in Google Scholar

21. BrizioAP, IsolanLW, SallesB, PrenticeC. Correlação entre contaminação gastrointestinal e presença de salmonella spp. Em carcaças de frango industrializadas no rio grande do sul. Rev Agric2013;88:1217.10.37856/bja.v88i1.35Search in Google Scholar

22. BrizioAP, PrenticeC. Use of smart photochromic indicator for dynamic monitoring of the shelf life of chilled chicken based products. Meat Sci2014;96:121926.10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.11.006Search in Google Scholar

23. PaulsonDS. To glove or to wash: a current controversy. Food Qual1996;2:604.Search in Google Scholar

24. De Groot-KosolcharienJ. Pandemonium of gloves: use and abuse. Am J Infect Control1991;19:2257.10.1016/S0196-6553(05)80252-4Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2014-11-18
Published in Print: 2014-12-1

©2014 by De Gruyter

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Selected Papers from MAS2013 Workshop
  3. Special section “Selected Papers from the Workshop on Modeling and Simulation of Food Processing and Operations of the MAS 2013 Conference (Athens, September 25–27, 2013)”
  4. Safety and Security in Fresh Good Supply Chain
  5. Performance Analysis of the Water Supply System of a Dairy Company by Means of an Advanced Simulation Tool
  6. Optimal Design of an Olive Oil Mill by Means of the Simulation of a Petri Net Model
  7. Original Research Articles
  8. Moisture Sorption Isotherms, Isosteric Heat of Sorption and Glass Transition Temperature of Murtilla (Ugni molinae T.) Berry
  9. Salt and Acid-Induced Soft Tofu-Type Gels: Rheology, Structure and Fractal Analysis of Viscoelastic Properties as a Function of Coagulant Concentration
  10. Heat Transfer during Steaming of Bread
  11. Kinetics and Thermodynamics of Gum Extraction from Wild Sage Seed
  12. Formation and Stability of Vitamin E Enriched Nanoemulsions Stabilized by Octenyl Succinic Anhydride Modified Starch
  13. Investigation on a Soft Tubular Model Reactor Based on Bionics of Small Intestine – Residence Time Distribution
  14. Comparison of Physicochemical and Gel Characteristics of Hydroxypropylated Oat and Wheat Starches
  15. Environomical Analysis and Mathematical Modelling for Tomato Flakes Drying in a Modified Greenhouse Dryer under Active Mode
  16. Extraction Kinetics and Properties of Proanthocyanidins from Pomegranate Peel
  17. An Investigation of Energy Consumption, Solar Fraction and Hybrid Photovoltaic–Thermal Solar Dryer Parameters in Drying of Chamomile Flower
  18. The Adsorption of Undesirable Impurities from Sunflower Oil on the Granulated Sorbents Based on Kaolin Clay
  19. “Bare” or “Gloved” Hands: A Study on the Production of Safe Food
  20. Physicochemical Characterization of Arrowroot Starch (Maranta arundinacea Linn) and Glycerol/Arrowroot Starch Membranes
  21. Optimization of Gluten-Free Cake Prepared from Chestnut Flour and Transglutaminase: Response Surface Methodology Approach
  22. Estimation of Equilibrium Moisture Content of Pistachio Powder through the ANN and GA Approaches
  23. Modeling of Furfural and 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural Content of Fermented Lotus Root: Artificial Neural Networks and a Genetic Algorithm Approach
  24. Physicochemical Properties of Chilled Abalone as Influenced by Washing Pretreatment in Citric Acid Combined with High Pressure Processing
  25. Synergetic Effects of Pulsed Electric Field and Ozone Treatments on the Degradation of High Molecular Weight Chitosan
  26. Physical, Thermal and Water-Sorption Properties of Passion Fruit Seeds
  27. Hydrolysis of Hazelnut Shells as a Carbon Source for Bioprocessing Applications and Fermentation
  28. Variations in Main Flavor Compounds of Freshly Distilled Brandy during the Second Distillation
  29. Characterization and Semiquantitative Analysis of Volatile Compounds in Six Varieties of Sugarcane Juice
  30. Influence of Citric Acid Pretreatment on Drying of Peach Slices
  31. Degradation Kinetics of Bioactive Compounds and Antioxidant Activity of Pomegranate Arils during the Drying Process
  32. Short Communications
  33. Effect of Sucrose Addition on Rheological and Thermal Properties of Rice Starch–Gum Mixtures
  34. Effect of Pulsed Electric Field on Freeze-Drying of Potato Tissue
Downloaded on 24.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijfe-2014-0196/html
Scroll to top button