Home Genealogy, Immanent Critique and Forms of Life: A Path for Decolonial Studies
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Genealogy, Immanent Critique and Forms of Life: A Path for Decolonial Studies

  • James William Santos ORCID logo EMAIL logo and Emil Albert Sobottka ORCID logo
Published/Copyright: December 28, 2022

Abstract

This article argues for a viable genealogical approach within critical theory that could settle the questions regarding normative viability of such critique. Then, the implications of the normative inheritance implied lead to the pairing of Jaeggi’s conceptualization and critique of forms of life with Rosa’s dual diagnosis of (late) modernity through the structural lenses of genealogy as tridimensional endeavor posed by Saar. In the end, the final argument is that a genealogical critique in these terms could be the next step towards the revitalization of decolonial studies and a path for direct political action.


Corresponding author: James William Santos, Postdoctoral researcher, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil, E-mail:

References

Agamben, G. (2009). “What is an apparatus?” and other essays. Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Allen, A. (2008). The politics of our selves: Power, autonomy, and gender in contemporary critical theory. Columbia University Press.10.7312/alle13622Search in Google Scholar

Allen, A. (2016). The end of progress: Decolonizing the normative foundations of critical theory. Columbia University Press.10.7312/alle17324Search in Google Scholar

Baynes, K. (2016). Habermas. Routledge.10.4324/9781315696423Search in Google Scholar

Césaire, A. (2006). Discurso sobre el colonialismo. Akal.Search in Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1977). Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews. Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (2001). Power. In J. D. Faubion (Trans.). New Press.Search in Google Scholar

González Casanova, P. (2006). El colonialismo interno. In P. González Casanova (Ed.), Sociología de la explotación. Clacso.Search in Google Scholar

Jaeggi, R. (2001). Solidarity and indifference. In W. A. Arts & R. J. A. Muffels (Eds.), Solidarity in health and social care in Europe. Springer.10.1007/978-94-015-9743-2_12Search in Google Scholar

Jaeggi, R. (2018). Critique of forms of life. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674988712Search in Google Scholar

Kelly, M. (Ed.). (1994). Critique and power: Recasting the Foucault/Habermas debate. MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kerner, I. (2022). Condições pós-coloniais abusivas e as tarefas da Teoria Crítica. Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais, 22, e41728. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7289.2022.1.41728.Search in Google Scholar

Nietzsche, F. W. (2009). On the genealogy of morals: A polemical tract. In I. Johnston (Trans.). Richer Resources Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Pinkard, T. P. (1994). Hegel’s phenomenology: The sociality of reason. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316036433Search in Google Scholar

Quijano, A. (2006). El “Movimiento indígena” y las cuestiones pendientes en América Latina. Argumentos, 19(50), 51–77.Search in Google Scholar

Quijano, A. (Ed.), (2014) Des/colonialidad y bien vivir: Un nuevo debate en América Latina (Primera edición). Universidad Ricardo Palma, Editorial Universitaria, Cátedra América Latina y la Colonialidad del Poder.Search in Google Scholar

Rosa, H. (2013). Social acceleration: A new theory of modernity. Columbia University Press.10.7312/rosa14834Search in Google Scholar

Rosa, H. (2019). Resonance: A sociology of the relationship to the world. Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar

Saar, M. (2007). Genealogie als Kritik: Geschichte und Theorie des Subjekts nach Nietzsche und Foucault. Campus Verl.Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, K. (2019). Hegel’s theory of normativity: The systematic foundations of the philosophical science of right. Northwestern University Press.10.2307/j.ctvdjrpqnSearch in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-06-13
Revised: 2022-10-12
Accepted: 2022-10-13
Published Online: 2022-12-28
Published in Print: 2023-02-23

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 26.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/humaff-2022-2034/html
Scroll to top button