Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
Reply to Jackendoff
-
Steven Gross
Published/Copyright:
December 21, 2007
Abstract
In this note, I clarify the point of my paper “The Nature of Semantics: On Jackendoff's Arguments” (NS) in light of Ray Jackendoff's comments in his “Linguistics in Cognitive Science: The State of the Art.” Along the way, I amplify my remarks on unification.
Published Online: 2007-12-21
Published in Print: 2007-12-19
© Walter de Gruyter
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Preface
- Linguistics in Cognitive Science: The state of the art
- Linguistics in Cognitive Science: The state of the art amended
- The challenge: Some properties of language can be learned without linguistic input
- Reply to Jackendoff
- The hermetic nature of linguistic research: A note to Jackendoff
- Gradience of Gradience: A reply to Jackendoff
- A parallel interface for language and cognition in sentence production: Theory, method, and experimental evidence
- Layers, mosaic pieces, and tiers
- Publications received October 2006 – November 2007
- Language index
- Subject index
- Contents of volume 24
Articles in the same Issue
- Preface
- Linguistics in Cognitive Science: The state of the art
- Linguistics in Cognitive Science: The state of the art amended
- The challenge: Some properties of language can be learned without linguistic input
- Reply to Jackendoff
- The hermetic nature of linguistic research: A note to Jackendoff
- Gradience of Gradience: A reply to Jackendoff
- A parallel interface for language and cognition in sentence production: Theory, method, and experimental evidence
- Layers, mosaic pieces, and tiers
- Publications received October 2006 – November 2007
- Language index
- Subject index
- Contents of volume 24
