As brief as possible (but no briefer)

David I. Beaver

doi:10.1515/THLI.2008.014

Home As brief as possible (but no briefer)

Article

Licensed

Unlicensed Requires Authentication

As brief as possible (but no briefer)

David I. Beaver

Published/Copyright: December 1, 2008

Published by

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Author Information Explore this Subject

From the journal Theoretical Linguistics Volume 34 Issue 3

MLA
APA
Harvard
Chicago
Vancouver

MLA
APA
Harvard
Chicago
Vancouver

Beaver, David I.. "As brief as possible (but no briefer)" Theoretical Linguistics, vol. 34, no. 3, 2008, pp. 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1515/THLI.2008.014

Beaver, D. (2008). As brief as possible (but no briefer). Theoretical Linguistics, 34(3), 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1515/THLI.2008.014

Beaver, D. (2008) As brief as possible (but no briefer). Theoretical Linguistics, Vol. 34 (Issue 3), pp. 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1515/THLI.2008.014

Beaver, David I.. "As brief as possible (but no briefer)" Theoretical Linguistics 34, no. 3 (2008): 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1515/THLI.2008.014

Beaver D. As brief as possible (but no briefer). Theoretical Linguistics. 2008;34(3): 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1515/THLI.2008.014

Copy

Copied to clipboard

BibTeX EndNote RIS

Published Online: 2008-12-01

Published in Print: 2008-12-01

You are currently not able to access this content.

Articles in the same Issue

Be Articulate: A pragmatic theory of presupposition projection
As brief as possible (but no briefer)
Transparency theory: Empirical issues and psycholinguistic routes
Two short notes on Schlenker's theory of presupposition projection
Why Be Articulate? Two ways to look at the Transparency Theory
Transparency Theory and its dynamic alternatives: Commentary on “Be Articulate”
Projection and pragmatics: Two comments
When satisfaction is not enough. Comments on Schlenker's ‘Be Articulate. A pragmatic theory of presupposition projection’
Presupposition projection: Explanatory strategies

Search journal Search the content of this journal

https://doi.org/10.1515/THLI.2008.014

Articles in the same Issue

Be Articulate: A pragmatic theory of presupposition projection
As brief as possible (but no briefer)
Transparency theory: Empirical issues and psycholinguistic routes
Two short notes on Schlenker's theory of presupposition projection
Why Be Articulate? Two ways to look at the Transparency Theory
Transparency Theory and its dynamic alternatives: Commentary on “Be Articulate”
Projection and pragmatics: Two comments
When satisfaction is not enough. Comments on Schlenker's ‘Be Articulate. A pragmatic theory of presupposition projection’
Presupposition projection: Explanatory strategies