Home Relevance theory and politeness
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Relevance theory and politeness

  • Christine Christie

    Christine Christie lectures on linguistics at Loughborough University. Her research interests include pragmatics, miscommunication, politeness and gender. Her publications include Politeness: Theories and Applications (Edinburgh University Press forthcoming) and Gender and Language: Towards a Feminist Pragmatics (Edinburgh University Press).

Published/Copyright: July 31, 2007
Journal of Politeness Research
From the journal Volume 3 Issue 2

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to open up for debate the question of whether Sperber and Wilson's (1995 [1986]) relevance theory can usefully inform politeness research. It is therefore designed to indicate some of the methodological implications for the study of politeness that would arise from an adoption of a relevance-theoretical framework. I begin by outlining some arguments posited by politeness theorists who have applied relevance theory and then provide a brief account of some of the key differences between the Gricean framework that informs Brown and Levinson's (1987 [1978]) theory of politeness and the account of utterance interpretation offered by relevance theory. I conclude by suggesting some of the differences in focus that would result from the analysis of politeness from a relevance-theoretical perspective.

About the author

Christine Christie

Christine Christie lectures on linguistics at Loughborough University. Her research interests include pragmatics, miscommunication, politeness and gender. Her publications include Politeness: Theories and Applications (Edinburgh University Press forthcoming) and Gender and Language: Towards a Feminist Pragmatics (Edinburgh University Press).

Published Online: 2007-07-31
Published in Print: 2007-07-20

© Walter de Gruyter

Downloaded on 22.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/PR.2007.012/html
Scroll to top button