Home Chapter 8 Sensitivity assessment of multi-criteria decision-making methods in chemical engineering optimization applications
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Chapter 8 Sensitivity assessment of multi-criteria decision-making methods in chemical engineering optimization applications

  • Seyed Reza Nabavi , Zhiyuan Wang and Gade Pandu Rangaiah
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Optimization in Chemical Engineering
This chapter is in the book Optimization in Chemical Engineering

Abstract

This chapter assesses the sensitivity of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods to modifications within the decision or objective matrix (DOM) in the context of chemical engineering optimization applications. Employing eight common or recent MCDM methods and three weighting methods, this study evaluates the impact of three specific DOM alterations: linear transformation of an objective (LTO), reciprocal objective reformulation (ROR), and the removal of alternatives (RAs). Comprehensive analysis of results obtained for six applications reveals that the weights generated by the entropy method are more sensitive to the examined modifications compared to the criteria importance through intercriteria correlation (CRITIC) and standard deviation (StDev) methods. Compared to LTO and RA, ROR is found to have the largest effect on the ranking of alternatives. Moreover, certain MCDM methods, namely, gray relational analysis (GRA) without any weights, multi-attributive border approximation area comparison (MABAC), combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS), and simple additive weighting (SAW) with entropy or CRITIC weights, and CODAS, SAW, and technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) with StDev weight are more robust to DOM modifications. This investigation not only corroborates the findings from our recent study, but also offers insights into the stability and reliability of MCDM methods in the context of chemical engineering applications. However, to generalize these findings, further studies are required on other MCDM methods and chemical engineering applications.

Abstract

This chapter assesses the sensitivity of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods to modifications within the decision or objective matrix (DOM) in the context of chemical engineering optimization applications. Employing eight common or recent MCDM methods and three weighting methods, this study evaluates the impact of three specific DOM alterations: linear transformation of an objective (LTO), reciprocal objective reformulation (ROR), and the removal of alternatives (RAs). Comprehensive analysis of results obtained for six applications reveals that the weights generated by the entropy method are more sensitive to the examined modifications compared to the criteria importance through intercriteria correlation (CRITIC) and standard deviation (StDev) methods. Compared to LTO and RA, ROR is found to have the largest effect on the ranking of alternatives. Moreover, certain MCDM methods, namely, gray relational analysis (GRA) without any weights, multi-attributive border approximation area comparison (MABAC), combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS), and simple additive weighting (SAW) with entropy or CRITIC weights, and CODAS, SAW, and technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) with StDev weight are more robust to DOM modifications. This investigation not only corroborates the findings from our recent study, but also offers insights into the stability and reliability of MCDM methods in the context of chemical engineering applications. However, to generalize these findings, further studies are required on other MCDM methods and chemical engineering applications.

Downloaded on 23.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111383439-008/html
Scroll to top button